DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 57686--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: johnboy1967
Date: February 11, 2025, 11:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi this case seems to be progressing along. I sent Gladstones
the letter as advised and this was their reply in October which
was basically irrelevant, just confirming they only had one
address for our contact.
VIA EMAIL ONLY
Our Reference:
30th October 2024
Dear Mrs
Request for Erasure of Personal Data
We write in response to your request for Erasure of Data,
specifically relating to erasing any older address than the
address shown below.
For completeness, our Firm hold only the below address for you;
Therefore, the request for Erasure is not applicable in these
circumstances.
Other Queries
Please note the remainder of your correspondence will be
addressed by the Legal Department in due course, please be
assured that the matter will remain on hold until then.
Yours sincerely
The Compliance Department
Gladstones Solicitors Limited
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Today we received a new email from Gladstones stating the
following. We are now looking for advice on how to tackle
this...........................
10 number deleted.10 / 31 / Premier Parking Enforcement Ltd -v-
deleted
Dear Mrs ,
We write further to your correspondence dated the 26th Oct er
2024.
May we take the opportunity to thank you for your patience
whilst awaiting a response.
The Amount Due/ Debt includes £70.00 claimed by our Client for
the time/resources spent facilitating the recovery of the unpaid
parking charge notice(s) pursuant to its ATA’s Code of Practice
and the Terms and Conditions of the Contract, which was entered
into upon the driver of the vehicle entering the Relevant Land.
The amount is a pre-determined and nominal contribution to our
Client’s losses as a direct result of your non-payment.
As our Client is satisfied the charge was issued correctly, we
invite you to make payment in full to the bank account detailed
below, quoting reference 10.1.
Gladstones Solicitors Ltd
Barclays Bank
Account Number: 33028712
Sort Code: 20-24-09
The outstanding amount is £170.00.
Alternatively, you can make payment online at
www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk or via the automated payment line
on 0333 0230 049 quoting your reference.
Failure to make payment before the 25th February 2025 will
result in legal proceedings being issued to recover the debt in
full.
Please note, we will not accept any further submissions from
you.
Kind regards,
Skye
Legal Assistant
Gladstones Solicitors Limited
Unit B
1st Floor
210 Cygnet Court
Centre Park
Warrington
WA1 1PP
w : www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk
t : 01565 755088
e : Skye@gladstonessolicitors.co.uk
I notice they avoided answering the questions posed to them in
the letter dated 26/10/24 as drafted by yourselves, .... I
notice they avoided answering the questions they were given
re..... 1. Am I to understand that the additional £70 represents
what you lot dress up as a 'Debt
Recovery' fee, and if so, is this nett or inclusive of VAT? If
the latter, would you kindly explain
why I am being asked to pay the operator’s VAT?
2. With regard to the principal alleged PCN sum: Is this
damages, or will it be pleaded as
consideration for parking? Can you advise on next move. Thank
you for all your time and effort.
#Post#: 57697--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: b789
Date: February 11, 2025, 12:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Typical of this firm of incompetent wannabe legals. The first
thing is I report them to HMRC for suspected VAT fraud (in the
£millions).
You can now either respond and repeat the questions they have
not answered an darn them that their refusal to answer them is a
breach of the PAP and will be used against them at any hearing,
or you can just sit back and wait for for the N1SDT Claim Form
to arrive from the CNCB.
the claim will contain Particulars of Claim (PoC) that fail to
comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a) which is a serious breach of
procedure and a defence with supporting persuasive case law will
be made for the claim to be struck out for this breach.
You are thankfully dealing with a firm whose incompetence is
embarrassing.
#Post#: 57843--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: NigelJK
Date: February 12, 2025, 11:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
He I am, some 5 years since last sticking my nose into the seedy
world PPCs, and one name that continues to astonish me as to
their presence is Gladstones. Given the volumes of these
invoices printed, someone, some where, must see that this is a
huge abuse of process and the practice should be outlawed.
PS. The new board is a vast improvement on Pepipoo (RIP)
#Post#: 57936--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: johnboy1967
Date: February 13, 2025, 6:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: b789 link ---
>
> Typical of this firm of incompetent wannabe legals. The first
thing is I report them to HMRC for suspected VAT fraud (in the
£millions).
>
> You can now either respond and repeat the questions they have
not answered an darn them that their refusal to answer them is a
breach of the PAP and will be used against them at any hearing,
or you can just sit back and wait for for the N1SDT Claim Form
to arrive from the CNCB.
>
> the claim will contain Particulars of Claim (PoC) that fail to
comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a) which is a serious breach of
procedure and a defence with supporting persuasive case law will
be made for the claim to be struck out for this breach.
>
> You are thankfully dealing with a firm whose incompetence is
embarrassing.
>
--- End Quote ---
I guess their "Please note, we will not accept any further
submissions from you." comment means we just wait for their
court papers to arrive. Thanks for your time and help on this
matter.
#Post#: 57988--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: b789
Date: February 13, 2025, 12:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Show us the N1SDT Claim Form when you receive it. Redact your
persona info, the claim number and the MCOL password. Leave
everything else, especially all dates and times visible.
*****************************************************
Page 7 of 7
DIR Previous Page