URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 42199--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: johnboy1967
       Date: October 24, 2024, 1:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Today we received letter from Gladstones solicitors with the
       capital letter routine   LETTER BEFORE CLAIM   Should we ignore
       this or is there another way of giving them aggravation.
       thanks for your help with this
       #Post#: 42200--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: October 24, 2024, 2:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A Letter Before Claim should not be ignored. It means they are
       planning to instigate a claim in the County Court. It would be
       useful to see a copy of this.
       #Post#: 42297--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: johnboy1967
       Date: October 25, 2024, 7:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is the letter received from Gladstones. Your advice as
       usual will be much appreciated.
       thank you
  HTML https://imgur.com/xcPkuUS
  HTML https://imgur.com/5FtM572
  HTML https://imgur.com/os9Dxe8
  HTML https://imgur.com/tNeYaE4
       #Post#: 42305--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 25, 2024, 7:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can't see the letter. If you're not sure on how to post images,
       please read this:
       READ THIS FIRST - Private Parking Charges Forum guide
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/
       Did you send the complaint to the DVLA as advised?
       #Post#: 42322--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: johnboy1967
       Date: October 25, 2024, 8:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hopefully these are now visible.
  HTML https://imgur.com/xcPkuUS
  HTML https://imgur.com/5FtM572
  HTML https://imgur.com/eqDRRZA
  HTML https://imgur.com/os9Dxe8
       I did get a letter from dvla stating who had asked for our
       details. I thought I had put it up a while ago.
       #Post#: 42336--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 25, 2024, 10:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Respond to the LoC with the following:
       --- Quote ---
       > Dear Sirs,
       >
       > Your Ref. 104320.10641
       > Gladstones Solicitors Ltd.
       > Claimant: Premier Parking Enforcement Enforcement Ltd
       >
       > I refer to your your letter of claim.
       >
       > I confirm that my address for service for the time being -
       assuming you don't delay any claim - is as follows, and any
       older address that you may have must be erased from your
       records:
       >
       > [MY ADDRESS]
       >
       > The alleged debt is disputed and any court proceedings will be
       vigorously defended.
       >
       > I note that the amount being claimed has increased by a hugely
       exaggerated amount which the Government called "extorting money
       from motorists" [Hansard]. Don't send me your usual mendacious
       waffle about that.
       >
       > I have two questions, and under the PAP I am entitled to
       specific answers:
       >
       > [indent]1. Am I to understand that the additional £70
       represents what you lot dress up as a 'Debt Recovery' fee, and
       if so, is this nett or inclusive of VAT? If the latter, would
       you kindly explain why I am being asked to pay the operator’s
       VAT?
       >
       > 2. With regard to the principal alleged PCN sum: Is this
       damages, or will it be pleaded as consideration for
       parking?[/indent]
       >
       > I await your response.
       >
       > Yours faithfully,
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 42343--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: johnboy1967
       Date: October 25, 2024, 10:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you so much for all the help given to us in order to deal
       with this. Should I send this reply by recorded delivery or can
       it be done online.
       #Post#: 42350--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 25, 2024, 10:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You send it as a PDF attachment by email. There is no better
       proof of delivery than an email.
       Signed for post is definitely not reliable. If the recipient
       refuses to sign for it, all you have is proof of non delivery.
       If you insist on posting anything, use the free Certificate of
       Posting from any Post Office. The Interpretation Act 1978 covers
       the "proof of posting" for deemed service of a letter in the UK.
       Specifically, Section 7 of this Act addresses the concept of
       deemed service, stating that unless the contrary is proven, a
       letter properly addressed, prepaid, and posted is deemed to have
       been received in the ordinary course of post.
       In practice, this means that if you can provide proof that a
       letter was posted (such as a certificate of posting from the
       post office), it is generally assumed to have been delivered
       unless the recipient can provide evidence to the contrary.
       #Post#: 42383--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: johnboy1967
       Date: October 25, 2024, 12:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have copied, pasted and filled in the address. Sorry to bore
       you but should I send it to their contact email address
       enquiries@gladstonessolicitors.co.uk
       thanks
       #Post#: 42407--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 25, 2024, 6:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ideally, you send the letter as a PDF attachment in an email.
       That address is a valid one for Gladstone.
       *****************************************************
       Page 6 of 7
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page