DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 30882--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: b789
Date: July 23, 2024, 5:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Nothing unexpected. They were never going to uphold an appeal.
However, you have gone through the motions and, as you have
observed, they have not addressed the issues raised in your
appeal.
I would suggest responding to their rejection with the
following, for the record:
[indent]Re: Parking Charge Notice [PCN Number]
I acknowledge receipt of your rejection letter dated [insert
date] regarding the above Parking Charge Notice (PCN). However,
I note that your response has not addressed the specific points
raised in my appeal.
Also, for the record and avoidance of any doubt, in my appeal I
clearly stated:
1. I explicitly informed you that there must be no transfer of
my personal details to any third-party debt recovery agents.
This serves as a formal notice that I will not tolerate any
harassment through DRA letters, which would constitute a breach
of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and a breach of GDPR
under the Data Protection Act 2018. Should there be any
deviation from this path, I reserve the right to pursue a Part
20 counterclaim against your company for GDPR breach and any
distress and inconvenience caused.
2. If you intend to pursue this alleged debt, which I
categorically deny, you should issue a claim in the County
Court. I am fully prepared to defend myself against any claim,
and I will present my appeal, your rejection, and this letter in
evidence.
You have now been warned and are on notice that any
correspondence from any third-party that is not a solicitor
acting on your behalf to issue a Letter of Claim or issue an
N1SDT county court claim form will be considered a breach of my
GDPR. Any evidence where you have provided my data to a third
party debt recovery agent may also be used as evidence of
unreasonable behaviour in any Part 20 counterclaim. Your company
is now formally on notice regarding this matter.
While I do not expect any further response from you, you must
understand that I am resolute in my stance. Should you wish to
pursue this matter further, you are invited to do so through the
proper legal channels.[/indent]
#Post#: 30898--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: johnboy1967
Date: July 24, 2024, 2:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I will send this this morning with the greatest of pleasure. I
will keep you all informed of any replies. Thank you.
#Post#: 31061--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: johnboy1967
Date: July 25, 2024, 2:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Message sent. Thank you all once again.
#Post#: 31062--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: johnboy1967
Date: July 25, 2024, 2:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
They replied to email. I find this astounding, they replied to
my appeal through this email but now claim no reply will be made
through this email. Full reply as follows...................
Attention Re: PCN: - VRM: [REMOVED] UNAUTHORISED PARKING
Yahoo
/
Inbox
Premier Parking Enforcement
From:
info@premierparkingenforcementltd.com
To:
[REMOVED]
Wed, 24 Jul at 15:57
Thank you for your email.
PLEASE NOTE:
THERE IS NO ONLINE PAYMENT SYSTEM. TO MAKE PAYMENT PLEASE CALL
THE 24 HOUR PAYMENT LINE 01302 513249.
IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO MAKE PAYMENT BY PHONE YOU CAN SEND A
CHEQUE/POSTAL ORDER (WITHIN TIMESCALES)
Appeals website is
HTML https://ppeappeals.atriahub.co.uk/
appeals will not be answered on this email please use the
website above.
If you are appealing/querying a parking charge notice or
enquiring about any other business please remember to include
ALL DETAILS as stated on the parking charge notice. If you do
not forward the drivers FULL NAME AND FULL RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS
details your appeal/enquiry will NOT be processed. Please
specify if you are the driver of the vehicle. We will reply to
appeals within 28 days if you do not receive a reply within 28
days please contact us as your appeal may not have been
processed.
We are unable to answer further queries on rejected appeals.
Show original message
#Post#: 31064--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: July 25, 2024, 2:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This is all standard. They accept appeals through the methods
stated on the notice, and will not engage in further
correspondence outside of the appeal process. The purpose of the
follow up email was just to show you're not backing down.
#Post#: 31073--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: b789
Date: July 25, 2024, 3:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Nothing unexpected there. We now wait and see what they decide
to do. They can simply disappear into the woodwork and you never
hear from them again or they pass you details to a DRA and they
will have breached your GDPR which opens them up to a
compensation claim or they initiate legal proceedings where they
will get a spanking.
You are dealing with intellectually malnourished ex-clamper
thugs. Don’t expect normal behaviour from them. Nothing to fear
though and you will have the satisfaction that if they try to
progress this further, it is going to cost them money.
#Post#: 31091--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: Boomer
Date: July 25, 2024, 4:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
johnboy1967,
your VRM and e-mail address are visible in your last post!
#Post#: 31209--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: johnboy1967
Date: July 25, 2024, 1:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks guys.
#Post#: 31286--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: July 26, 2024, 6:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
OP, I suggest you go back to the sign on site which set out the
terms and conditions.
According to IPC, Premier Parking Logistics is not an Approved
Operator, neither is Walton Watkins - see IPC website:
HTML https://portal.theipc.info/aos-members/p/?page=2
As such, they have no authority to request your info from DVLA.
Similarly, they are not able to access IAS nor IAS to consider.
PPE have no legal standing because they are not a party to the
alleged contract.
Just stick to the facts of the sign, IPC Code of Practice etc.
when you appeal to IAS. Less cage rattling for fun, just stick
to the basics...
...IMO.
And if PPE were a party, then as they are an AO and they may
institute debt recovery procedures pursuant to their CoP. You
cannot tell them to naff off or take you to court..well you can
tell them but this has as much legal force as a PCN from PPE ...
...IMO.
#Post#: 31330--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mistakenly thought parking was for row of shops
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: July 26, 2024, 3:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> As such, they have no authority to request your info from DVLA
--- End Quote ---
This is why I suggested a SAR to DVLA. My assumption is that the
company that is an approved operator are the ones who did this,
but as their company is seemingly not offering contracts in
their name on the site, it's difficult to see what reasonable
cause they would have for accessing the OP's data in the first
place, much less passing it on to a third party debt collector.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 7
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page