URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 28231--------------------------------------------------
       Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code 30
       and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: cyril
       Date: July 1, 2024, 4:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi Guys,
       My freind got a pcn and this is the letter he wrote and the
       parking services did not cancel the PCN and also did not
       mentioned anything about the marking lines fading away, as you
       can see from thier response and image of the road limited bay.
       Has he got a chance for appeal.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/Id0i93K.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/NZpjrqg.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/7EPmc5M.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/QiClUA4.jpeg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/ED19Lc6.jpeg
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/JMXjSLUTg7ppS2UZ8
  HTML https://lancashire.tarantoportal.com/PCN/ViewImages
       Lancashire Parking Services,
       PO BOX 1023
       Preston,
       PR1 3ZA
       Dear Sir or Madam,
       Parking ticket number: LQ53062433
       Date of issue: 29/06/2024
       Vehicle registration number: VK55ZWD
       I am writing to formally challenge the above Penalty Charge
       Notice.
       On 29th June 2024 my vehicle was issued with a Penalty Charge
       Notice for the reason of Contravention code 30 and parked for
       longer than permitted.
       First of I like to apologized the inconvenience caused. However,
       I would like to explain why I had parked where I did and I would
       like to submit an appeal for the following reasons:
       Please see attached evidence of the disabled badge, as i forgot
       to displayed the Disable badge on my car dashboard, as I had to
       come on emergency as my mother in law had a fall, she lives on
       her own and had a phone call from telecare, so I had to make an
       urgent visit, as the family member who usually look after was
       away to London and there was no one in the house.
       We had the 2 nurses come Michelle and Carolyn from Urgent
       Community Rapid response team, which I was panicking and rushed
       to come to Preston and the Nurses were already here and the
       carer, which took all of us 4 hours to get her up, make her
       safe, as she is very vulnerable.
       She has Dementia/Alzheimer’s, One eye loss of eyesight’s, Breast
       Cancer, Chronic Kidney Disease, High Blood Pressure, High
       Cholesterol, Incontinence issues, Knees Bone to Bone, Arthritis,
       Mental Health issue, Depression, Very Confused and Vulnerable.
       She needs to be monitored 24hrs due to her Vulnerability and
       lives on her own.
       I am requesting under compassionate reasons for cancelling the
       PCN that the fine be waived for this reason.
       I would like to point out the marking bay lines is also faded
       and hard to see where limited bay starts and finish.
       Yours faithfully,
       #Post#: 28245--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 1, 2024, 5:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The informal challenge was not confrontational in any way, so I
       am surprised they are playing hard-ball and not cancelling the
       PCN. Councils usually have a policy on responding to challenges
       to PCNs, and sometimes this is publicly available on their
       website, but I had a quick look and if its there, a more
       detailed search would be necessary as it is not on the parking
       pages.
       So is it worth waiting for the Notice to Owner ? In theory, the
       discount option is lost if one waits for this, but many councils
       do re-offer the discount when rejecting formal representations
       against an NtO, but nothing is in writing to tell you this !
       Therefore I would wait a bit for others to contribute, but
       clearly your friend would be requesting a discretionary
       cancellation.  I don't think the worn bay markings are strong
       grounds for an appeal at the adjudicators, as the signs are
       clear, and also your reps implied the bay was clear enough to
       need to look at the signs and hence use the BB.
       However, as I said, wait a bit for others to comment. Only
       question is this - has your friend had a PCN cancelled in
       similar circumstances, (failure to display the BB) ?
       #Post#: 28257--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 1, 2024, 6:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       These are the council photos:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/WGhVevs.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/Nzv9tPV.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/LTDeFNC.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/gy4Zg2Q.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/GwILbSj.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/CvfRjZz.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/rrB2kCH.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/p8KzaCH.png
       I'm not sure an appeal based on the signage would get very far.
       If your friend waits for the notice to owner and then make a
       representation within 14 days of the date of issue, then the
       discount is almost invariably reoffered, so there is limited
       risk in carrying on; and formal representations are often given
       more thorough consideration by a more senior officer.
       In the meantime I'll get hold of the traffic order for this bay,
       you never know it might not exist (we've had a number of such
       cases recently).
       #Post#: 28319--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: Enceladus
       Date: July 2, 2024, 7:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Was the Blue Badge that you sent a copy of to the council issued
       to you, or was it your Mother-in law's?
       #Post#: 28327--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: cyril
       Date: July 2, 2024, 9:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for your replies.
       He had replied to them when he received the PCN and they
       rejected. he has until 14/07/2024 to pay with discount. He can
       contest Penalty Charge Notice and waiting for the Notice to
       owner from the council, which he will lose the discount. I told
       him you should of contacted me and I would of asked the forum on
       behalf you.
       Council are just compassionate at all and just rejecting , so
       you just pay up, by saying we are giving you discount. I don't
       think this council will offer discount again.
       He never had BB cancelled, as this is his first time.
       Blue Badge was issued to his wife and she went to help out on
       that day Mother in law who lives in different town, as other
       family member went to London.
       I don't understand on this comment traffic order for this bay,
       you never know it might not exist
       #Post#: 28332--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 2, 2024, 10:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Traffic Order is what imposes the parking restriction, the
       sign is there to tell motorists what the restriction is. If no
       Traffic Order exists for the street, then despite a sign being
       there, there is no contravention, because the PCN has been
       served for a contravention of the Traffic Order, not the sign.
       However, in most cases there is a Traffic Order, but we have
       found a few missing recently.
       #Post#: 28358--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: cyril
       Date: July 2, 2024, 1:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/hncjpOn.jpeg
       Traffic Order map i digged out.
       #Post#: 28490--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 3, 2024, 12:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No idea what that is, it might be an extract from a traffic
       order but a map on its own isn't worth diddly squat. An example
       of a traffic order would be the Curzon Street Area (Various
       Roads) Burnley, Burnley Borough (Part Revocation, Prohibition Of
       Waiting, Prohibition Of Loading, Limited Waiting etc) Order 2013
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QKlZ-g5RwJlqGGhY_SqyjCXtLoAoADob/view.<br
       />There is no quicker way to get the traffic order, you're just
       going to have to wait for the council to send it to me.
       That being said I think a case of compelling mitigation should
       be put to the council at the formal representations stage, which
       is why my advice is to wait for the notice to owner. If in the
       meantime we find out the TRO is flawed or missing, so much the
       better.
       #Post#: 28511--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: cyril
       Date: July 3, 2024, 1:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks i see the detailed of the Traffic order information for
       the Burnley, Curzon street area.
       I will inform my friend not to pay and wait for the Notice to
       Owner.
       #Post#: 28525--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Penalty Charge Notice for the reason of Contravention code
       30 and parked for longer than permitted.
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: July 3, 2024, 1:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP, and while the NTO is working its way through the system, pl
       get your friend to re-order the issues to present a timeline pl.
       I live with my wife in ****;
       Her mother, who is severely disabled, lives in *** with **** as
       a carer;
       On *** my wife received a phone call/message from *** to the
       effect that ****;
       We immediately drove to *** and parked in *** which is where my
       MIL lives;
       My wife holds a BB, however in our rush we forgot to display
       this;
       The situation in my MIL's house was **** and we stayed for ***
       until ***.
       I won't offer a view on whether and for how long a BB would
       exempt the driver in this bay, others will comment. However,
       what's clear is that if on display it exempted the holder from
       the parking restriction without limit then this is strong
       mitigation. But if even on display it wouldn't exempt the holder
       from the time limit then its display is neither here nor there
       because the car was in situ for more than 1 hour. I think it's
       necessary to decide what emphasis to place on the BB compared to
       mitigating factors regarding the purpose of the visit and the
       situation you found. IMO it works to your advantage that the BB
       was not yours because if your wife's disability meant that if
       she was left with your MIL she would be of little assistance
       then you could hardly have left them in order to move your car
       out of prospective contravention.
       I think we need a full set of facts beginning before you parked
       in order to work out where your main line(s) of defence might
       lie and how to present these to maximum effect.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page