DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 28366--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest Code 52M (driving through modal filter)
Tavistock Avenue / Blackhorse Lane E17
DIR By: LividFromE17
Date: July 2, 2024, 1:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: timoteus link ---
>
> [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=2340.msg27999#msg27999
date=1719757776]
> [member=1768]timoteus[/member] at this point it would be
really helpful if you could make a subject access request to WF
council to find out exactly why they DNC'ed your appeal
>
--- End Quote ---
I've submitted an SAR - it's stated that a response may take up
to 1 month to be received
[/quote]
Thanks for doing that [member=1768]timoteus[/member], it's
appreciated.
#Post#: 30260--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest Code 52M (driving through modal filter)
Tavistock Avenue / Blackhorse Lane E17
DIR By: timoteus
Date: July 18, 2024, 11:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Here's the SAR response:
HTML https://i.imgur.com/8Nc7lVR.png
HTML https://i.imgur.com/wwHHZLo.png
[member=2094]LividFromE17[/member], have you received the NOR
letter yet? First thing to check is whether the wording relating
to the sign positions has been updated.
#Post#: 30264--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest Code 52M (driving through modal filter)
Tavistock Avenue / Blackhorse Lane E17
DIR By: LividFromE17
Date: July 18, 2024, 12:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: timoteus link ---
>
> [member=2094]LividFromE17[/member], have you received the NOR
letter yet? First thing to check is whether the wording relating
to the sign positions has been updated.
>
--- End Quote ---
Aha! Yes I have! How very timely as I am at this very moment
posting the NoR and considering my next move.
It does indeed have the same wording, so I shall detail this in
my appeal to Adjudicator, and I am very grateful to you for your
time in following this up.
NoR p1
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1p4151J6vaMf1DTbxr-2TeUv81A0SixXx/view?usp=sharing
NoR p2
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-6Uu-sp--iDLCu12yXf5XMVeGVHao1lf/view?usp=sharing
NoR p3
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-6sEWzS6sjaJ7nH8RGSt2XENDQ0Qde69/view?usp=sharing
nb - as well as this error - this is also the NoR template which
has the omission flaw referred to on the spreadsheet: Shelley
Sinclair v London Borough of Lewisham (218033612A, 26 September
2018)
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_vkg5vinbDUe1XU7LDo42IuNsgR4Kxc1/edit,<br
/>not advising of the Tribunal's power to accept a late appeal.
...and the PCNs for both conflate of periods of allowance:
--- Quote ---
> “If you fail to pay the penalty charge or make representations
before the end of the
> period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of this
notice, a charge certificate
> may be issued to you increasing the penalty charge payable
to...”
--- End Quote ---
This is also true of another appeal I made in February that came
into the list on 12 June 2024, for which I'm still waiting the
decision on (how long does is it supposed to take?).
So - my question now is, should I appeal to the Adjudicator on
all three points?
#Post#: 30267--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest Code 52M (driving through modal filter)
Tavistock Avenue / Blackhorse Lane E17
DIR By: John U.K.
Date: July 18, 2024, 12:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> that came into the list on 12 June 2024, for which I'm still
waiting the decision on (how long does is it supposed to take?).
--- End Quote ---
Have you checked with the Tribunal?
#Post#: 30284--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest Code 52M (driving through modal filter)
Tavistock Avenue / Blackhorse Lane E17
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: July 18, 2024, 1:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The conflation argument does not run anymore. Last positive
outcome was October 2022. 2220655455. I was the representative.
#Post#: 31652--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest Code 52M (driving through modal filter)
Tavistock Avenue / Blackhorse Lane E17
DIR By: LividFromE17
Date: July 30, 2024, 12:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> The conflation argument does not run anymore. Last positive
outcome was October 2022. 2220655455. I was the representative.
>
--- End Quote ---
Thanks Hippocrates, that's good to know and explains why it's no
longer in the spreadsheet of known flaws.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page