URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 59002--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
       was being cut
   DIR By: challenge_cheaters
       Date: February 20, 2025, 6:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > The decision was made on 31 Jan and therefore you are beyond
       the time limit for asking for a review(14 days) although a
       request could be submitted with reasons for lateness.
       >
       > But on what grounds?(not just that you disagree with the
       decision).
       >
       > You were given several procedural impropriety arguments as
       regards the NOR but I can't find any reference to these in the
       decision. If you made these points but they were ignored by the
       adjudicator then this could be grounds for a review. But you
       need to act quickly.
       >
       > Have you got a copy of your appeal?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Here you go:
       A: The alleged contravention did not occur
       Q: Please describe why you want to challenge the penalty charge
       notice
       A: Dear London Borough of Harrow,
       The alleged contravention did not occur. It is alleged on the
       PCN that a contravention
       took place while my car was parked on Cannon Lane opposite
       lamppost 3, but my car
       was not at that location. Lamppost 3 is situated opposite number
       19 Cannon Lane, but
       my car was opposite number 16 Cannon Lane. If the contravention
       alleged on the PCN
       did not occur (which it did not), it is then irrelevant whether
       a contravention did or didn't
       occur at some other point along Cannon Lane, as it is only the
       matter alleged on the
       PCN that counts.
       It follows that the PCN must be canceled.
       Additionally, I am a resident of 11 Cannon Lane, whereby I just
       moved my car to the road
       whilst my garden hedge was being cut. It seems the parking
       restriction is to prevent
       commuters from parking there for free and then walking to Pinner
       Underground Station,
       and not to punish local residents.
       Yours faithfully,
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > The decision was made on 31 Jan and therefore you are beyond
       the time limit for asking for a review(14 days) although a
       request could be submitted with reasons for lateness.
       >
       > But on what grounds?(not just that you disagree with the
       decision).
       >
       > You were given several procedural impropriety arguments as
       regards the NOR but I can't find any reference to these in the
       decision. If you made these points but they were ignored by the
       adjudicator then this could be grounds for a review. But you
       need to act quickly.
       >
       > Have you got a copy of your appeal?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 59380--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
       was being cut
   DIR By: challenge_cheaters
       Date: February 23, 2025, 5:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi All, Any help/ further feedback would be much appreciated. I
       think I have until 28 Feb to pay so hopefully I can hear back
       from someone really soon.  Thanks
       #Post#: 59383--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
       was being cut
   DIR By: SITR
       Date: February 23, 2025, 7:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Forgive my uneducated take on this, but it seems you had a
       reasonably valid procedural error to argue, then shot yourself
       in the foot by saying "I'm a resident & I did indeed park there
       because I don't believe I should be subject to the rules".
       #Post#: 59399--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
       was being cut
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: February 23, 2025, 10:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For some reason you did not include the procedural issue at
       all/in sufficient detail* to persuade the adjudicator to your
       cause.
       I asked to see your appeal because had you made these points in
       sufficient detail then the adjudicator was bound to consider
       them, but their written decisions shows that they did not*.
       I therefore cannot see any grounds for asking for a review
       because the evidence of the impropriety of the NOR was known
       prior to the hearing.
       *- from the decision:
       '..The Appellant states that the Notice of Rejection is
       non-compliant.'
       Where??
       Did you tick the box 'procedural impropriety' when registering
       your appeal but not include any substantive argument?
       #Post#: 59430--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
       was being cut
   DIR By: challenge_cheaters
       Date: February 23, 2025, 3:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > For some reason you did not include the procedural issue at
       all/in sufficient detail* to persuade the adjudicator to your
       cause.
       >
       > I asked to see your appeal because had you made these points
       in sufficient detail then the adjudicator was bound to consider
       them, but their written decisions shows that they did not*.
       >
       > I therefore cannot see any grounds for asking for a review
       because the evidence of the impropriety of the NOR was known
       prior to the hearing.
       >
       > *- from the decision:
       >
       > '..The Appellant states that the Notice of Rejection is
       non-compliant.'
       >
       > Where??
       >
       > Did you tick the box 'procedural impropriety' when registering
       your appeal but not include any substantive argument?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Hi there, I ticked 'The alleged contravention did not occur'.
       Does it mean I just have to pay the fine? :(
       #Post#: 59432--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
       was being cut
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: February 23, 2025, 4:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       IMO, yes.
       You can request a review but I cannot see relevant grounds and
       the authority is not bound to halt progress while this plays out
       and therefore could apply the surcharged penalty after the
       28-day period has elapsed.
       'Full penalty charge notice amount stated to be paid within 28
       days.'
       ..
       the period of 28 days beginning with the ...date on which the
       adjudicator’s decision is served on [you].
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 5
   DIR Previous Page