DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 42622--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: roythebus
Date: October 27, 2024, 12:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Well spotted there!
#Post#: 45654--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: challenge_cheaters
Date: November 14, 2024, 3:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
>
> I've got 28 days from the 7th October (so I have until the 4th
November) to appeal to the adjudicators. Please can someone
advise.
>
> Yes, and you're both wrong. Your lack of knowledge is not the
issue, it's their error which exposes them to grounds of
procedural impropriety.
>
> The mandatory content is that an appeal may* be registered
before the end of the period of 28 days beginning on the date of
service AND that the adjudicator has discretion to register an
appeal after the 28-day period has elapsed.
>
> Date of service is presumed to be 2 working days after
posting.
>
> The letter is dated 7th, therefore service was on 9th which is
day 1, day 28 is 5 Nov.
>
> IMO, there are two failures in the NOR as regards appealing
which should be put to the adjudicator as procedural
improprieties:
> 1. What's included in the NOR is incorrect and not in
accordance with regulations;
> 2. They have also omitted mandatory information.
>
> IMO, these are strong grounds and you should appeal.
>
> Wait for others.
>
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote from: mrmustard link ---
>
> Pcn is for a residents bay. Sign is for permit holders, not
resident permit holders. Therefore the contravention did not
occur. Add that as another ground at appeal
>
--- End Quote ---
Many Thanks!
#Post#: 45656--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: challenge_cheaters
Date: November 14, 2024, 4:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi there, even though I submitted my appeal to the london
tribunals on the 04 November, Harrow still sent me a Charge
Certificate. Is that appropriate?
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/6yVNrs0N/IMG-0174.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/6yVNrs0N
#Post#: 45668--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: November 14, 2024, 5:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: challenge_cheaters link ---
>
> Hi there, even though I submitted my appeal to the london
tribunals on the 04 November, Harrow still sent me a Charge
Certificate. Is that appropriate?
>
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/6yVNrs0N/IMG-0174.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/6yVNrs0N
>
--- End Quote ---
Normally no, but the CC is dated 8th Nov, and you sent off your
appeal on 4th Nov. It is entirely possible that London Tribunals
had not yet informed the council of your appeal.
#Post#: 45669--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: November 14, 2024, 5:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Do you have a case number from the tribunal?
#Post#: 46059--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: challenge_cheaters
Date: November 18, 2024, 9:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
>
> Do you have a case number from the tribunal?
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes I do, it's 2240496230
#Post#: 58806--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: challenge_cheaters
Date: February 18, 2025, 4:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
:( Unfortunately, the Tribunal rejected my appeal (see below).
Is there anything else I can do?
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/4mJbM9bJ/Decision-Refused-25-EXTRACT-20250131011204.png
HTML https://postimg.cc/4mJbM9bJ
#Post#: 58852--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: February 19, 2025, 6:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The decision was made on 31 Jan and therefore you are beyond the
time limit for asking for a review(14 days) although a request
could be submitted with reasons for lateness.
But on what grounds?(not just that you disagree with the
decision).
You were given several procedural impropriety arguments as
regards the NOR but I can't find any reference to these in the
decision. If you made these points but they were ignored by the
adjudicator then this could be grounds for a review. But you
need to act quickly.
Have you got a copy of your appeal?
#Post#: 58858--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: SITR
Date: February 19, 2025, 7:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
EDIT: Deleted post as I'd totally misinterpreted something!
#Post#: 58890--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ticket for parking outside my house whilst my garden hedge
was being cut
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: February 19, 2025, 10:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
..is the decision, but what's required is the appeal.
A simple assertion that the NOR was not compliant would not,
IMO, require the adjudicator to compare and contrast it with the
regs: this is the appellant's burden.
OP, your appeal pl.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 5
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page