URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 26192--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: sparx Date: June 15, 2024, 3:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=2208.msg26148#msg26148
       date=1718461274]
       If we could have some sort of case management tool to ensure
       people don't miss deadlines or otherwise mess up the process,
       that would be helpful, though I don't think any of the current
       large language models can provide any meaningful drafting, the
       few examples I've seen have been a complete car crash (in one
       recent case where a client send me a draft written for him by
       Chat GPT, I explained why it was all wrong and his response was
       "that's the last time I'm using AI to draft an appeal").
       I don't think something like this could ever be commercially
       viable in the sense of making a commercial return, the sums in
       issue are just too small (and if you went to market with an RFP,
       I very much doubt you'd get any quotes under 100k).
       But then if someone has the time and skill to write it in the
       first place, the ongoing run costs should be fairly minimal and
       I'm happy to chip in to any hosting costs, to the extent that
       advertising revenue can't cover it.
       The other issue is maintaining he system, we don't want to have
       something like the old NIP wizard on pepipoo which wasn't
       updated for 10+ years.
       [/quote]
       What would you like from a system such as that? If you could
       draft some "necessity" and "nice to have" features I could have
       a quick go at seeing how feasible it is?
       Alternatively, I am not sure if it exists or even if you can use
       addons on CAF but there might be a "per user" calendar
       plugin/addon which would allow you to set events per user on
       certain dates (and then notify them)?
       #Post#: 26216--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: ivanleo Date: June 15, 2024, 7:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The two most basic of inputs would need to be:
       1) The Act of Parliament under which the PCN falls (which is
       given on the face of the PCN or Notice to Owner), and
       2) The stage at which the PCN is.
       You'd want to incorporate instructions based on all the various
       permutations listed at
  HTML https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/eat/understanding-enforcement-process<br
       />and
  HTML https://www.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/how-to-appeal/<br
       />(the most common being TMA 2004, LLA&TFL Act 2003 and LLA Act
       1996) depending on whether it's a roadside PCN, CCTV PCN, drive
       away PCN etc. You'd want the system to explain that for their
       type of PCN, they can make informal / formal representations as
       applicable.
       You'd also want to explain that at least as far as England &
       Wales is concerned, pretty much all local authorities except
       Nottingham and (for CAZ PCNs only) Birmingham, the discount is
       reoffered at the formal reps stage if representations are made
       within 14 days of the date of issue of the notice to owner or
       postal PCN.
       And then you'd want to cover all the scenarios I have written
       these guides for:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/charge-certificate-cases-under-the-traffic-management-act-2004-no-original-pcn/
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/charge-certificates-london-local-authorities-and-tfl-act-2003-london-local-autho/
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/charge-certificates-london-local-authorities-and-tfl-act-2003-london-l-1805/
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/charge-certificate-the-road-user-charging-schemes-(penalty-charges-adjudication-/
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/charge-certificate-cases-under-the-traffic-management-act-2004-no-original-notic/
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/ground-2-witness-statements-statutory-declarations-accepted-by-the-traffic-enfor/
       As for the last guide, we've not got a version for the Traffic
       Penalty Tribunal as that scenario has not come up yet.
       That's the most basic structure that would at least explain the
       procedural side of things.
       Of course one major problem we have is that most people come to
       us with a half-baked story and they misunderstand / misdescribe
       what's happened or what documents they've received, which is why
       we always ask to just see the paperwork and mostly ignore what
       people tell us they think has happened (at least until after
       we've seen the documents).
       #Post#: 26272--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: Hippocrates Date: June 16, 2024, 10:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This thread appears to have gone off topic.  ;D
       I simply asked how to encourage more people to fight.
       I will contact one of the cameramen involved with Parking Mad
       some years ago. MrMustard and I appeared on separate programmes.
       Meanwhile, I am doing my best to get stories published and
       getting moving traffic legislation changed:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/tommy-poirot-to-expose-all-london-councils'-bus-lane-enforcement/msg26266/#msg26266
       And my petition which now needs to resuscitated due to the
       General Election.
       My petition:
       Create the right to examine council witnesses in moving traffic
       contraventions
       To homogenise London Bus Lane legislation with Moving Traffic
       legislation. Para 7(6)
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/1996/9/schedule/1/enacted<br
       />needs to be incorporated into The London Local Authorities and
       Transport for London Act 2003.
       Millions of Penalty Charge Notices are sent out to motorists
       each year in London. It is a matter of record that, in the cases
       overturned in bus lane legislation, the training of the officers
       concerned is somewhat questionable as is their actual knowledge
       of the law. And, indeed, the lack of proper certification of
       their camera equipment. It is a human right to have the facility
       to question one's accusers about their evidence and the lack of
       homogeneity concerning these two legislations is stark and
       unfair.
       #Post#: 26279--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: ivanleo Date: June 16, 2024, 11:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] I think the key issue is having
       willing OPs is not enough, we need to be able to support them.
       The best way IMO is to get more willing representatives. Maybe
       you can find a law student who fancies some real-life litigation
       experience?
       #Post#: 26281--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: John U.K. Date: June 16, 2024, 11:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]To homogenise London Bus Lane legislation with Moving
       Traffic legislation. - Hippocrates' petition.[/quote]
       I think that this hints at an alternative way forward. As Mr
       Mustard & CP point out above (replies#9 & #11), the disparity in
       legislation governing the various types of PCN and ensuing
       enforcement needs urgently addressing.
       Might it be fruitful to collect together from the experts here
       what each considers the most important changes needed? For
       example the blanket rejection by EAs of OoT statements, or
       enforcing 'bus lanes when.where no 'buses are running.
       Adjudicators could have powers to direct EAs to make
       improvements to signage and markings and to consider mitigation.
       Then perhaps collaborating with, e.g., R.A.C. and the A.A. in
       assembling a case for the new government.
       Standardising the enforcement process might makle it easier for
       recipients of PCNs to appeal and encourage local authorities to
       be less trigger-happy with the 'computer say no' button.
       #Post#: 26283--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: Hippocrates Date: June 16, 2024, 11:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Exactly my thoughts re new government - the time is right and
       ripe. And homogenisation.  Been saying for it years and even
       mentioned to an adjudicator some months ago.
       #Post#: 26284--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: ivanleo Date: June 16, 2024, 12:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=John U.K. link=topic=2208.msg26281#msg26281
       date=1718556741]
       [quote]To homogenise London Bus Lane legislation with Moving
       Traffic legislation. - Hippocrates' petition.[/quote]
       I think that this hints at an alternative way forward. As Mr
       Mustard & CP point out above (replies#9 & #11), the disparity in
       legislation governing the various types of PCN and ensuing
       enforcement needs urgently addressing.
       [/quote]
       Be careful what you wish for. If the TMA 2004 applied across the
       board, many of the arguments we use would disappear.
       #Post#: 26286--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: John U.K. Date: June 16, 2024, 12:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Be careful what you wish for. If the TMA 2004 applied across the
       board, many of the arguments we use would disappear. CP8759
       Which is why I suggested a collective approach to deciding what
       needs changing, what needs standardizing, what needs retaining
       and I would add a very considered approach to the law of
       unintended consequences.
       #Post#: 26298--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: Hippocrates Date: June 16, 2024, 1:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       All I wish for is for the incorporation of para. 7(6) into
       moving traffic law. As cp8759 discussed with me the last time we
       met, the whole system may well collapse, which is not my
       objective.  ;D Frankly, the discrepancies re dates etc can be
       kept as the clowns swap and change anyway. In the last year, RBK
       have had three incarnations of their bus lane PCNs.
       #Post#: 26391--------------------------------------------------
       Re: How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?
       By: peodude Date: June 17, 2024, 4:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think we necessarily need more representatives. As
       admirable it is that people spend their free time helping other
       people, i think that can coexist with self representation. After
       all, it's only fairly recently, with the hard work of cp in
       particular, that the majority of cases on Pepipoo were getting
       representation.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page