URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Non-motoring legal advice
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 25831--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Non motoring CCJ
       By: peodude Date: June 13, 2024, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=2186.msg25735#msg25735
       date=1718226728]
       I would also question whether there is any point in applying to
       set the liability order aside. Is the council likely to be able
       to recover the outstanding council tax from the former tenants,
       assuming they can even be found? As I understand it if the
       council tax cannot be recovered from a tenant, the council can
       go after the landlord instead, so if you're going to end up
       having to foot the bill anyway then it might end up being an
       awful lot of hassle for no real benefit.
       [/quote]
       It depends on the terms of the tenancy agreement.
       If, upon expiration of the fixed-term of the contract, the
       tenancy continues as a contractual periodic tenancy, then the
       tenant will be liable to pay the council tax until the end of
       their notice period (even if they leave the property before the
       end of the notice period). This is because they are still in
       that original contract which is at least 6 months long.
       For a statutory periodic tenancy, the council can pursue the
       Landlord directly for unpaid council tax.
       #Post#: 25944--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Non motoring CCJ
       By: Colin_S Date: June 14, 2024, 3:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just received an email from the council confirming they have
       accepted my evidence and have adjusted liability. Hopefully the
       enforcement agents get the same....
       #Post#: 26071--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Non motoring CCJ
       By: ivanleo Date: June 14, 2024, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=460]Colin_S[/member] I've moved this thread to the
       non-motoring forum.
       #Post#: 26985--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Non motoring CCJ
       By: H C Andersen Date: June 21, 2024, 9:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I rent a flat and a previous tenant appears to have advised the
       council they had vacated the property more than 12 months ago
       and that I was responsible for the council tax when, in fact,
       they stayed until evicted earlier this year. The council has
       subsequently billed me at the property and then started court
       proceedings for non payment resulting in a judgement against me.
       I only became aware of this when I found letters addressed to me
       at the property very recently.
       Can we unpick this pl.
       As I understand it..
       You are the landlord/owner?
       Are you also a resident?
       The simple default position is that CT is payable by the
       owner/landlord unless the property is occupied by another person
       under a tenancy.
       Have there been periods during your ownership when the property
       has not been occupied and therefore you were liable for CT?
       Was the tenant paying CT prior to ceasing to occupy the
       property? If so, how e.g. by instalments etc?
       Were these payments current until the date the tenant claims
       they vacated the property?
       Have you SAR'd the council to obtain copies of their
       correspondence to you?
       I don't know how detailed advice could be given until the issue
       of who is actually liable for any unpaid CT and its quantum have
       been established and the sequence of council correspondence to
       whom, where and when examined.
       #Post#: 27337--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Non motoring CCJ
       By: Colin_S Date: June 24, 2024, 3:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am the owner but not occupier.
       The tenant was paying council tax for some years but 'appears to
       have' advised the council that they no longer occupied the
       property and that I was liable despite their continued occupancy
       for the last 12 months +.
       I have managed to sort this out now with the council and the
       only tax I am liable for is for the current void period whilst
       the property is being refurbished and re-let, so we're all
       pretty much sorted now. I'm just waiting for them to agree
       figures as they may offer a discount for the property being
       empty and, if not, I would expect to at least receive single
       person's discount.
       A SAR may be interesting if only to see exactly how the council
       were notified of me supposedly being liable for the tax. This
       flat falls under a Selective Licensing Scheme so the council
       have my name and address on file but the nomination has my name
       spelt incorrectly suggesting it came via a third party.
       #Post#: 27533--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Non motoring CCJ
       By: H C Andersen Date: June 26, 2024, 3:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You are liable by default unless the council are notified by
       another party, in this case a tenant.
       When that tenant then notifies the council that they are
       vacating the property then you automatically become liable when
       this takes effect. As I understand it, you do not become liable
       simply because the tenant defaults on payment, how CT is
       collected is associated with but not the same as determining who
       is liable in the first instance.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page