DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
*****************************************************
#Post#: 22316--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: May 13, 2024, 2:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Neil B link ---
>
> What are the consistent references to "we"?
>
--- End Quote ---
I'd also really like to know the answer to this.
[member=1594]chueewowee[/member] when is your court hearing due?
I'd love to get a transcript.
#Post#: 22318--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: Southpaw82
Date: May 13, 2024, 3:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
>
> [quote author=Neil B link=topic=1840.msg22266#msg22266
date=1715601129]
> What are the consistent references to "we"?
>
--- End Quote ---
I'd also really like to know the answer to this.
[member=1594]chueewowee[/member] when is your court hearing due?
I'd love to get a transcript.
[/quote]
I was simply going to lock this garbage. If you want to play,
fee free!
#Post#: 22337--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: May 13, 2024, 5:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Southpaw82 link ---
>
> I was simply going to lock this garbage. If you want to play,
fee free!
>
--- End Quote ---
Just like most FMOTL content, it might provide an endless source
of entertainment :D
#Post#: 22524--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: Lodesman
Date: May 15, 2024, 5:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Why not move it to :-
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/fotl-and-other-misguided-folk/
#Post#: 22560--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: Neil B
Date: May 15, 2024, 8:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Lodesman link ---
>
> Why not move it to :-
>
>
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/fotl-and-other-misguided-folk/
>
--- End Quote ---
'WE' wouldn't appreciate that.
#Post#: 22565--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: Lodesman
Date: May 15, 2024, 8:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
:)
#Post#: 22624--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: ManxTom
Date: May 15, 2024, 3:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I don't think he (or should it be "they"?) is a FMOTL though.
He's not once mentioned Magna Carta, common law or Admiralty
courts, and he hasn't said "I (or "we") didn't contract to pay
CAZ and ULEZ fees!"
Maybe it's a Welsh thing...
#Post#: 22634--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: May 15, 2024, 4:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=691]ManxTom[/member] see reply 15:
--- Quote from: chueewowee link ---
>
> In order to save pointless replies, informing about procedure
of pcn appeals: As I stated in my opening post, the case is
about to reach court.
>
> That means:
> - we have not accepted a demand and,
> - offers for solution have not been satisfactory frpom our
point of view.
> - 'Court' means a court of law - a civil court at the county
court, not an adjudicator or a TEC.
> - Time for representations to the LA are over.
>
> Moreover, we did not accept the pcn, on th ebasis of claim of
unlawful.
> We did not appeal to an adjudicator because that implies
forgoing redress at a court of law; a civil court.
>
--- End Quote ---
Like the FMOTL brigade, he is labouring under the
misapprehension that:
1) It's up to him to "accept" or "not accept" the PCN,
2) It's somehow up to him whether the routes of redress are
satisfactory,
3) It's up to him to decide which venue has jurisdiction,
4) He can unilaterally ignore Parliament's decision to remove
such matters from the jurisdiction of the county court and give
exclusive jurisdiction to the adjudicator.
I wonder if he'll come back after he's lost and tell us that the
courts are all "corrupt"?
#Post#: 22644--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: Neil B
Date: May 15, 2024, 5:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
>
> I wonder if he'll come back after he's lost
--- End Quote ---
Not a chance.
#Post#: 25761--------------------------------------------------
Re: CAZ/ULEZ areas : Were letters sent to local residents by
your authority - yes or no?
DIR By: chueewowee
Date: June 12, 2024, 5:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
He is back. The he has a name.
I'm here to teah you a lesson. But I will not spend long; Mainly
here for good folk, to encourage htem in the face of miserable
unreasaonable snide comments that abound everywhere onb these
islands now.
Forst I'd like to teach some of you, quite a few of you, some
mannes.. You're too far away. But let me tell you You wouldn'tt
dare in my precense to denonstrate your poverty of spiirit with
the same trite, bad manners. Quite usual amongst the 'PCN
experts'.
I see therer eare various snide remarks, including reference to
FMOTL and 'we'. That's after complaininbg about priciples, and
thelaw. The common law you thinbk does not exist, when in fact
it is the just about the WHOLE of the law, GOVERNING
princliples.
Ok Let's begin the show down. I wil get personal, like you have,
for the sake of the good folk who drop by, becausre yo uar
enmisleadingf them, in your stuppidity.
The 'we' is we. Thtaq is not 'I' alone.
Th ei is not alone, Thats all yo need tonow. We coul dbe the
whol epublicfor all you know. And ther is a we. I t is Father
and son. My son is an apprectice asked to pay £235.00, with
threats to his livlihood upon enforcement after ignoring his
ountnence to an initial fine of £90 or so, as I already
mentioned.
That should be enough to get you impovershed ones going. You
know, the ones who are the same as the inmpoverished WEF minions
obn our councils, government and in fact, all intistutions,
polluting our whole public life.
You see, what you have usually won do date, is avoiding paying
when the LA made a simple mistake in the letters on a page... OK
fair enough, but really you were still liable otherwise. Its
apetty matter. OUrs was a great matter like so many other poor
folk hit with penalties for CAZ as first time, unknowing
entrants.
.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 5
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page