URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 20821--------------------------------------------------
       UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre, Coventry
   DIR By: _wooky_
       Date: April 27, 2024, 3:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       My wife and/or myself have parked at this car park 2 or 3 times
       a month for the 20+ years that it has been open.
       One of us parked here on the date of the alleged offence to run
       a few errands in town.
       It's unfathomable to us that we would have left without paying
       for the parking and whilst we often pay via card we occasionally
       pay with cash. We have no record of a card payment for the
       parking on the date of the alleged offense.
       My wife is the hirer of the vehicle.
       The only other time we've received a parking charge notice we
       didn't get advice and my wife confirmed I was the driver. We got
       a whole barrage of letters, including from Debt Recovery Plus,
       and we simply ignored them all. They eventually stopped sending
       letters.
       What is the correct course of action in this instance?
       Initial letter and Third Party Authorisation from Skoda
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/duwmGqO[/img]
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/kd1JPgz[/img]
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/Ywhvgd8[/img]
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/Ax76sko[/img]
       First letter from UKPC
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/vsTENXF[/img]
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/vnMNLIa[/img]
       'Final Reminder' from UKPC
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/5IJBfco[/img]
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/iCQE1lb[/img]
       Thank you for your help and advice 🙏❤️
       #Post#: 20822--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: _wooky_
       Date: April 27, 2024, 3:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hmmm... the images don't appear to have inserted inline.
       They're all viewable at
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/lzZnRvA.
       #Post#: 20855--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: Dave65
       Date: April 28, 2024, 6:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is not a driving offence!
       #Post#: 20890--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: April 28, 2024, 12:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: _wooky_ link ---
       >
       > The only other time we've received a parking charge notice we
       didn't get advice and my wife confirmed I was the driver. We got
       a whole barrage of letters, including from Debt Recovery Plus,
       and we simply ignored them all. They eventually stopped sending
       letters.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       As an aside, ignoring them is not usually wise, although you
       appear to have avoided any further consequences for that case
       (assuming it's now more than 6 years since the incident, as
       that's the deadline for the parking company to sue).
       I note that UKPC are claiming they are able to hold you liable
       as the hirer under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act,
       and that they have received a "signed statement to the effect
       that at the material time the vehicle was hired to you under a
       hire agreement, a copy of the hire agreement and a statement of
       liability signed by you under that hire agreement". Did UKPC
       (not Skoda) provide you with a copy of those documents when they
       sent you the parking charge notice? If not, they cannot hold you
       liable as the hirer and your wife as the hirer could appeal
       along the lines of the below:
       [indent]Dear Sirs
       I have received you Notice to Hirer ________ for Vehicle
       Registration Mark _______. There is no obligation for me to name
       the driver at the time and I will not be doing so. I am
       appealing this charge on the grounds that I have no liability as
       the hirer of the vehicle.
       I note from your correspondence that you claim that under
       Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 ("the Act") I
       am liable to pay the unpaid parking charge, and that you have
       received from the registered keeper a signed statement to the
       effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to me
       under a hire agreement, a copy of the hire agreement and a
       statement of liability signed by me under that hire agreement.
       Despite your claims, you have failed to comply with the
       requirements of the Act. These failures include (but are not
       limited to):
       - A failure to serve a Notice to Hirer containing all the
       information required by 14(5) of the Act.
       - A failure to include with the Notice to Hirer a copy of the
       additional documents mentioned by 13(2) of the Act.
       As a result of this, you are unable to recover the specified
       charge from me, the hirer. As I do not have liability for this
       charge, I am unable to help you further with this matter. If you
       do not accept this appeal, you must issue a POPLA code.
       Yours...[/indent]
       This appeal should be sent by your wife as the hirer, being
       careful not to tick any boxes etc. on the online form revealing
       who was driving. Keep an eye on the spam folder in your emails,
       and chase them if they do not respond within 35 days.
       I note your letter from Skoda mentions they will pay up if they
       receive another notice and seek to reclaim this from you - might
       be worth getting one step ahead of this just in case, and
       checking exactly what your lease agreement says about this (some
       rental companies do this despite their contracts not allowing
       them to).
       #Post#: 20948--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: April 29, 2024, 1:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       PPCs don't really understand PoFA, but hey-ho!
       @DWMB, I'm not clear from the OP whether they have been supplied
       with the docs referred to, hence these questions to the OP.
       OP, you have posted a Notice to Keeper and a Notice to Hirer.
       The NTH states that the registered keeper has 'supplied ..a
       statement[confirming that the vehicle was on hire to the
       addressee at the material time], a copy of the hire agreement
       and a statement of liability[signed by the addressee]..'.
       So, were the 'three' documents included with the NTH?
       You've also posted the Notice to Keeper, but it's unclear
       whether you obtained this from Skoda e.g. sent with their
       correspondence to you etc, or from the creditor and it
       accompanied the NTH.
       Was the NTK included with the NTH?
       And just to confirm, this process really has two distinct parts:
       1. The NTK to the registered keeper. The keeper may relieve
       themselves of liability by providing the creditor with the
       'three' docs. That's it as far as they're concerned. The
       creditor may not pursue them further, there's no second bite of
       the cherry whatever the creditor subsequently decides to do.
       2. The creditor may pursue the hirer. It's not mandatory, it's
       an option. But in order to do so they must send a notice to the
       hirer and this is to be accompanied by the 'three' docs AND a
       copy of the NTK.
       Why is this necessary?
       Because the 'three' docs and NTK prove that the creditor tried
       to recover the charge from the registered keeper, as required,
       but that the keeper has relieved themselves of liability and the
       creditor may no longer pursue them for the charge- and may
       therefore under PoFA pursue the hirer in lieu.
       An additional purpose of the NTK is as a reference document
       because the creditor may not make different financial or more
       onerous procedural demands upon the hirer than originally made
       on the keeper and PoFA specifically refers to the use of the NTK
       as a reference document for this purpose.
       So, your potential grounds of appeal to the creditor are as set
       out by DWMB, but IMO you should answer the above questions
       before sending.
       #Post#: 20956--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: April 29, 2024, 3:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > @DWMB, I'm not clear from the OP whether they have been
       supplied with the docs referred to, hence these questions to the
       OP.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Nor am I... I did ask about the documents in my post. If they
       have supplied everything we'll need to tweak the appeal, but if
       I were a betting man my money would be on them not having done
       so.
       #Post#: 21001--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: b789
       Date: April 29, 2024, 12:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If Skoda Financial Services are members of the BVRLA, they are
       already in breach of their ATA rules. A PCN from an unregulated
       private parking company (PPC) is not an "offence" and the PPC is
       not an "authority".
       As already mentioned above, only the driver can be liable (and
       they have no idea who was driving) unless UKPC has fully
       complied with the strict requirements of PoFA paras 13 and 14.
       In our experience, it is as rare as hens teeth that a PPC fully
       complies with the requirements of PoFA when it comes to
       hire/lease vehicles.
       Whilst UKPC may mention that they have received the 3 documents,
       it matters not an iota if they did not include copies of those
       documents with the NtH. Unless the hirer received the NtH and
       copies of al three required documents, they cannot transfer
       liability for the PCN from the driver to the hirer.
       It will be worth reviewing the wording on your lease agreement
       with Skoda to see how it mentions parking charges from private
       parking companies. Unless there is specific wording about
       private parking charges, they cannot just charge you an admin
       fee and threaten to pay the PCN.
       This from the BVRLA's own guidance
  HTML https://www.bvrla.co.uk/static/uploaded/61b3298b-a918-499b-9ac8b8bea2b726a0.pdf:
       Paying and recharging

       Rental and leasing companies that choose to pay a private
       parking charge notice and recharge it to their customer should
       ensure that their rental/leasing agreement allows them to do
       this. 


A sample clause, which would allow
       you to pay and recharge, is: “You will be responsible for paying
       the following charges: 
All charges and legal costs for
       any congestion charge, road traffic offence, parking offence or
       parking notice, or any other offence involving the rental
       vehicle, including from the vehicle being clamped, seized or
       towed away.”
       Omission of the "or parking notice" contravenes the advice from
       the BVRLA's own trade guidance.
       #Post#: 21968--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: _wooky_
       Date: May 9, 2024, 11:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you so much for your considered and detailed replies.
       To answer the main questions (all variations on a theme it seems
       :) )...
       Did UKPC (not Skoda) provide you with a copy of those documents
       when they sent you the parking charge notice?
       No, the only documents we've received from UKPC are
  HTML https://imgur.com/vsTENXF
       and
  HTML https://imgur.com/5IJBfco.
       Nothing
       was included with those letters.
       So, were the 'three' documents included with the NTH?
       No.
       Was the NTK included with the NTH?
       No, it was not.
       In light of that, does the appeal need to be tweaked or are we
       good to go?
       Btw, this morning we received the first letter from ZZPS
       Limited, a debt collection agency.
       #Post#: 21969--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: _wooky_
       Date: May 9, 2024, 11:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Also, how long do we have to appeal?
       The Parking Charge Date is 16/03/2024.
       The NTK (which we've only received from SKODA) is dated
       19/03/2024.
       The NTH is dated 04/04/2024.
       Thanks again for your help and advice.
  HTML https://imgur.com/zbwzo0R
       #Post#: 21973--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UKPC PCN - No Payment - Lower Precinct Shopping Centre,
       Coventry
   DIR By: _wooky_
       Date: May 9, 2024, 12:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > It will be worth reviewing the wording on your lease agreement
       with Skoda to see how it mentions parking charges from private
       parking companies. Unless there is specific wording about
       private parking charges, they cannot just charge you an admin
       fee and threaten to pay the PCN.
       >
       > This from the BVRLA's own guidance
  HTML https://www.bvrla.co.uk/static/uploaded/61b3298b-a918-499b-9ac8b8bea2b726a0.pdf:
       >
       > Paying and recharging

       >
       > Rental and leasing companies that choose to pay a private
       parking charge notice and recharge it to their customer should
       ensure that their rental/leasing agreement allows them to do
       this. 


A sample clause, which would allow
       you to pay and recharge, is: “You will be responsible for paying
       the following charges: 
All charges and legal costs for
       any congestion charge, road traffic offence, parking offence or
       parking notice, or any other offence involving the rental
       vehicle, including from the vehicle being clamped, seized or
       towed away.”
       >
       > Omission of the "or parking notice" contravenes the advice
       from the BVRLA's own trade guidance.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       We're still trying to dig out a copy of the contract hire
       document. The only thing we've seen so far that references fines
       is in a summary letter after we took delivery of the car...
  HTML https://imgur.com/vJ6rrhX
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 8
   DIR Next Page