URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1621--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 20, 2023, 2:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Traffic orders:
       The Kingston upon Thames (Prescribed Routes) (No. 6) Traffic
       Order 2013
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pY1ckGVZ_BhME1CNl410ttef5UjbQxYl/view?usp=sharing
       The Kingston upon Thames (Prescribed Routes) (Amendment No. 44)
       Order 2023
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iaURkPm5QHzt7H8qtWNH4E0jS7z2GxK3/view?usp=sharing
       You could measure the distance from the party wall of numbers 1
       and 3, I don't think the sign is 15 metres from there. If the
       sign is in the wrong position, that's a breach of the
       regulations.
       #Post#: 1777--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: dk007
       Date: July 22, 2023, 12:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks, I have made the representation by post and kept a proof
       of postage.
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > Yes it's a good idea to type out the declaration stated on the
       form, but don't use the actual forms.
       >
       > You can't do a combined representation online so it has to be
       done by post. I won't go into loads of detail but there's a very
       good reason to do it this way (normally I'd always say to do
       everything online, but a case with multiple PCNs like this is an
       exception).
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 1778--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: dk007
       Date: July 22, 2023, 12:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sure, will do.
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > Traffic orders:
       >
       > The Kingston upon Thames (Prescribed Routes) (No. 6) Traffic
       Order 2013
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pY1ckGVZ_BhME1CNl410ttef5UjbQxYl/view?usp=sharing
       > The Kingston upon Thames (Prescribed Routes) (Amendment No.
       44) Order 2023
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iaURkPm5QHzt7H8qtWNH4E0jS7z2GxK3/view?usp=sharing
       >
       > You could measure the distance from the party wall of numbers
       1 and 3, I don't think the sign is 15 metres from there. If the
       sign is in the wrong position, that's a breach of the
       regulations.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 3916--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: dk007
       Date: August 26, 2023, 3:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I have received reply for my representation and they have
       rejected for all 3 PCNs.
       Attached is the rejection letter.
       Please could you advise next action on this?
       Thanks
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 3969--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: August 27, 2023, 2:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are grounds to carry on, as far as I can see there are two
       possible points:
       1) The traffic order
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1iaURkPm5QHzt7H8qtWNH4E0jS7z2GxK3<br
       />creates a restriction "from a point 15.1 metres east of the
       party wall of Nos. 1 and 3 Portland Road", which would be
       towards the end of the school zig-zags:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/vZ8NWtn.png
       However the signs are actually far close to the property
       boundary than they should be, at less than 9 metres:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/Tl1FWjF.png
       General direction 2 of Schedule 8 to the TSRGD provides that:
       [indent]
       2.  An upright sign mentioned in paragraph 1 must be placed as
       near as practicable to the point the restriction or prohibition
       begins or ends.
       [/indent]
       It's not a sure thing, but this has won in a couple of prior
       cases, such as:
       Stanmore Quality Surfacing Ltd v City of London (2230256434, 12
       July 2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/12DH5F76jBQlKu2zwC0IAHZGs0oI5pRc4/view?usp=sharing
       Michael Dempsey v London Borough of Enfield (2230348292, 26
       August 2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1gm5wYAaOUAoy98tzestBeUbQZq4M-dka
       The other argument is that by saying this:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/22dbg7k.png
       they have unlawfully fettered their discretion. They've been
       asked to consider the circumstances as a whole and they're
       telling us that they have refused to do so.
       Lastly the grounds stated on the council website do not match
       the legislation, not by a million miles:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/g9AMAH6.png
       This has seen some recent success:
       James Bettell v London Borough of Barnet (2180498755, 16 January
       2019)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1Dob-9BvSfv--ox4_r64Oi-Y_LWK9QkZx,<br
       />allowed
       Tracey Allan v London Borough of Barnet (2180502295, 20 February
       2019)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1WDh9frRbKwG0H7fGUTqqqTBiACRKlNia,<br
       />refused
       Sonya Karafistan v London Borough of Barnet (2230228494, 25 May
       2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1h3CIvjuWnDlvZiLQRbASX5YgCL4w-Uuy,<br
       />allowed
       Martin Howley v London Borough of Ealing (2230274232, 29 June
       2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qmCoQoX_3YPGLXui9U0k6XehnVhCHPVE/view?usp=sharing,<br
       />allowed
       None of these grounds are guaranteed to succeed, but you only
       need to win on one point. You therefore need to decide whether
       you want to carry on with the full amount in play, or pay now
       and forfeit the right to appeal.
       If you want to carry on, I'm happy to represent you.
       #Post#: 4173--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: dk007
       Date: August 30, 2023, 5:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, Many thanks for taking time out to work out the possible
       grounds. I would be grateful if you can represent me on this,
       Please advise what do I need to do next.
       #Post#: 4188--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: August 30, 2023, 6:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'll drop you a PM.
       #Post#: 4223--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: dk007
       Date: August 31, 2023, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks, Replied to the PM.
       #Post#: 7472--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN for entering into a pedestrian zone
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: October 15, 2023, 6:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Outcome
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1yEYO6x36lvjp0VoNLLIjFN2h4KjHsyCz.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page