URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 28228--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: LoneStartState
       Date: July 1, 2024, 4:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OK Brill
       Appeal submitted relying on formal reps with me listed as the
       appellant's representative.
       Will update in due course.
       #Post#: 29306--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: LoneStartState
       Date: July 9, 2024, 5:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Council evidence was received Friday.  Unfortunately I was away
       camping from Friday to Monday and have been looking at the
       evidence today.
       They submitted a more up to date TRO that includes the correct
       prohibition times.  The VCA approval they submitted is for the
       BLADM055 TES Digital Systems (TEMDIGI) fixed cameras that was
       shown in the DFT URL linked in post number 6.
       I'm drafting a skeleton argument asap but obviously there isn't
       a great deal of time as I'm again away on Thursday evening.
       I'll try and get something for review asap.
       #Post#: 29322--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: July 10, 2024, 1:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Date for the appeal hearing?
       Please post up the Council's summary of why they believe the
       appeal should be rejected.
       #Post#: 29386--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: LoneStartState
       Date: July 10, 2024, 8:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi John
       I haven't selected a date yet.  If I choose one sufficiently far
       into the future can I still upload evidence/documents after
       making the hearing selection?  The TPT website gave me the
       impression that once a hearing type and date was selected, no
       more evidence/documents such as a skeleton argument etc would be
       able to be added and the hearing selection needs to be made
       before this Friday the 12th.
       I'll post appeal summary this evening although when looking
       through their evidence I don't think I saw a summary by them,
       just the PCNs, NORs, TRO, VCA certificate etc.  Will double
       check.
       Thanks
       #Post#: 29387--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: July 10, 2024, 8:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > The TPT website gave me the impression that once a hearing
       type and date was selected, no more evidence/documents such as a
       skeleton argument etc would be able to be added
       --- End Quote ---
       I thought this sounded a bit odd so I had a rummage on the TPT
       site and found
  HTML https://www.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/want-to-appeal/
       If you click on the hyperlink 'Evidence' you get a long pop-up
       which includes this sentence:
       --- Quote ---
       > Don’t worry if you do not have all evidence you would like to
       provide to hand when submitting your appeal. It can be added
       later as your case progresses.
       --- End Quote ---
       Which leaves me wondering as to how come you've got an evidence
       pack if you've not yet registered an appeal?
       #Post#: 29411--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: LoneStartState
       Date: July 10, 2024, 11:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just to clarify
       I registered an appeal relying on prior formal representations.
       Council then uploaded evidence pack a few days later last Friday
       but I was away until Monday and couldn't deal with it until
       yesterday.
       I now need to select hearing type and give a date but wasn't
       sure if I would be able to submit further evidence after this.
       Think I should be ok to just submit hearing preference and
       submit a skelly soon after within a reasonable timeframe which I
       shall do.
       Thanks
       #Post#: 29451--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: Phantomcrusader
       Date: July 10, 2024, 7:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The PCN says the penalty must be paid “no later than” when the
       new regs now say “must be paid within the period of 28 days
       beginning with the date on which the penalty charge notice is
       served.” The same applies to the time for making
       representations. These raise an old legal point based on the
       word “within”. It’s missing this ground of appeal: (i)the
       vehicle in question was at the material time hired from that
       firm under a hiring agreement. Also missing this ground: (g)the
       order which is alleged to have been contravened in relation to
       the vehicle concerned, except where it is an order to which Part
       6 of Schedule 9 to the RTRA 1984 applies, is invalid. Also:
       (i)the enforcement notice should not have been served because—
       (i)the penalty charge has already been paid in full, or
       (ii)the penalty charge has been paid, reduced by the amount of
       any discount set in accordance with Schedule 9 to the TMA 2004,
       by the applicable date as specified in paragraph 1(3) of
       Schedule 3 to the 2022 General Regulations.
       The Notice of Rejection below “Dear” wrongly states the The
       Transport Act 2000 when it is now the TMA 2004 that is relevant
       and it fails to give you a proper deadline for when a Charge
       Certificate may be served and to indicate the nature of an
       adjudicator’s power to award costs.
       #Post#: 30933--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: LoneStartState
       Date: July 24, 2024, 5:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Update: Hearing is 7th August
       [member=1]cp8759[/member]
       Would it be possible to have a copy of the full FOI letter for
       the camera make/model you received from the council please?
       Feel free to redact personal info etc.
       Thanks
       #Post#: 31030--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 24, 2024, 4:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: LoneStartState link ---
       >
       > Would it be possible to have a copy of the full FOI letter for
       the camera make/model you received from the council please?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       [member=1337]LoneStartState[/member] I have emailed it to you.
       #Post#: 33010--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Slough Borough Council Being in a Bus Lane Sussex Place
   DIR By: LoneStartState
       Date: August 11, 2024, 6:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Appeal was dismissed. C'est la vie.
       Unfortunately I left myself very little time to write the
       skeleton argument/response to council submissions and so only
       uploaded it Monday morning 48 hours prior to the hearing.
       Already risking an adjournment but the council rep stated they
       had read it.
       My argumentation re the camera certificate was probably not
       optimal so that fell by the wayside.
       De minimis seemed to be a complete no go as well with this
       adjudicator.  I was constantly reminded that if the vehicle was
       in the bus lane then a contravention occurred and that's all
       that needed to be decided regardless of intrusion distance.
       Likewise length of time before restriction end irrelevant.
       The missing grounds identified by Phantom Crusader did hold some
       weight but not enough to amount to PI.
       Thanks for all the guidance.  Never attended the tribunal before
       so had some value as a learning process.  At least the council
       had to actually work for their money.
       Full decision below.
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/y1VPKmG.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/w7XP9RR.png
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page