DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 23234--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: elucidate
Date: May 20, 2024, 1:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I haven't looked at the map because that report was produced by
the City of Westminster whereas the alleged contravention
occured in Tower Hamlets. I only linked to that report because
it was interesting to know a local authority did such a big
review based the argument I am making.
It looks like I have to just suck it up and pay the penalty?
#Post#: 23240--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: May 20, 2024, 2:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't clear from your post.
Looking at the GSV posted and those from previous years, it
seems clear that the carriageway forms a natural bridge across
the carriageway. It also includes within its length blister
paving which marks a crossing point.
#Post#: 23989--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: May 27, 2024, 7:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: elucidate link ---
>
> No need to be so incandescent! :D I was referring to the bit
where it says "I must advise you that if you make a
representation and we reject it you will be liable for the full
charge ..."
>
--- End Quote ---
[member=1498]elucidate[/member] that is nothing short of a lie,
if you challenge the notice to owner within 14 days of the date
of issue, they almost invariably reoffer the discount to
discourage you from appealing to the tribunal. That's why I said
from the start that it's worth taking this at least to the
notice to owner stage.
#Post#: 24072--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: elucidate
Date: May 27, 2024, 12:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for that input. Just for my own peace of mind, you're
aware of cases where they've threatened to remove the discount
if a formal challenge is made, yet they've re-offered it anyway?
#Post#: 24174--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: May 27, 2024, 6:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: elucidate link ---
>
> Thank you for that input. Just for my own peace of mind,
you're aware of cases where they've threatened to remove the
discount if a formal challenge is made, yet they've re-offered
it anyway?
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes, that happens in pretty much every case. The only councils
that actually don't reoffer the discounts are:
1) Nottingham, and
2) For Clean Air Zone PCNs only, Birmingham.
The only other exception is where someone's sent something
confrontational or outright rude, but that's fair enough.
Of course nothing is 100% guaranteed, it could be that yours is
the first case where Tower Hamlets decides to change it policy
and become intransigent like Nottingham, but you'd have to be
exceptionally unlucky.
#Post#: 24292--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: elucidate
Date: May 28, 2024, 2:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks [member=1]cp8759[/member].
I'm gonna send an appeal off tonight, God willing. I've found a
street in London (Strutton Ground) where there is a single
yellow line on a raised carriageway and there is a yellow sign
saying no waiting only at CERTAIN TIMES of the day, which I
would argue definitely proves that the presence of a raised
carriageway in and of itself does not automatically mean you are
never allowed to park on it.
#Post#: 24306--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: elucidate
Date: May 28, 2024, 4:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Here's my draft:
HTML https://1drv.ms/w/s!AhJd2Q4uph3xgcgOcWI0wK_QFRg3Ow?e=BJ947n
HTML https://1drv.ms/w/s!AhJd2Q4uph3xgcgOcWI0wK_QFRg3Ow?e=BJ947n
#Post#: 24323--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: May 28, 2024, 5:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=1498]elucidate[/member] have you received the notice to
owner?
#Post#: 26422--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: elucidate
Date: June 17, 2024, 8:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I thought I did receive the NtK but it turns out to just be a
hard copy of the informal rejection letter that I had already
prior received via email.
What are the implications? That the appeal I sent post-informal
rejection, but before the NtK, is meaningless?
#Post#: 26425--------------------------------------------------
Re: Tower Hamlets, code 28 Parked on road raised to pavement
level, Ashfield Street
DIR By: John U.K.
Date: June 17, 2024, 10:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Not necessarily. Did you send your challenge precisely as in
your draft?
HTML https://1drv.ms/w/s!AhJd2Q4uph3xgcgOcWI0wK_QFRg3Ow?e=BJ947n
If not please post what you did send.
Please post the rejection so we can see how well or otherwise
the Council considered your Challenge.
Then, as soon as you receive the NtO (Notice to Owner),as CP
says, please post here, redacting only name & address.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 3
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page