URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 19641--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: April 13, 2024, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have made the formal representation today, thanks for the
       draft Hippocrates.
       Ill share with you the outcome when I receive the decision.
       Thanks.
       #Post#: 20026--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 19, 2024, 5:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've requested the traffic order.
       #Post#: 23202--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: May 20, 2024, 10:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Curiouser and curiouser...
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/KMXUjfP.png
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/VsvRCGS.png
       I've now requested the "other" traffic order, let's see what
       turns up.
       #Post#: 23203--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: May 20, 2024, 10:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What are they like!?
       #Post#: 23335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: May 21, 2024, 4:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] & [member=1]cp8759[/member] I
       did formal representation on 21/04 since then I have not
       received any further letter from Newham Council.
       #Post#: 23370--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: guest17
       Date: May 21, 2024, 6:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This looks like the original Notice:-
  HTML https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/L-55296-279
       Take your pick as to bus clearway or prescribed route.
       Mike
       #Post#: 23800--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: ahsan
       Date: May 24, 2024, 12:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       I received letter today Newham have rejected the formal
       representation.
       Here is the letter:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IMrqnIsUilS8l0S1YEVZHptBafF8vwr-/view?usp=sharing
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/13r9i90cTnBE6QU_gFzGj_FnhY5J_-lUS/view?usp=sharing
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/17aveeKGKZt4J5fAcUqlD68vtnlAKbwf2/view?usp=sharing
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rhCKngc_tmPbLeWHhZmxUNo7dLvj5dp4/view?usp=sharing
       Can you please suggest what should we do next?
       Thanks in advance.
       #Post#: 23894--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: lexy
       Date: May 25, 2024, 7:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “No entry except buses”?
       As far as I’m aware - and I’m willing to be corrected - that is
       not a legal combination of signs that councils can use or
       enforce. I believe the only “except” plate you can use with a no
       entry sign is “except cycles”.
       “Buses only” is fine. “No motor vehicles except buses” is also
       fine. But not “no entry except buses”.
       This raises two other technical points. Firstly, councils can’t
       enforce “no entry” signs. They can enforce you making a
       prohibited turn into a no entry road. They can enforce you
       failing to proceed in the direction of an arrow shown on a blue
       sign. But not a pure “no entry”.
       Secondly, “no entry” just means you can’t physically pass the
       sign. It doesn’t mean you can’t *be* past the sign. Near my
       work, there’s a two-way road with a no entry sign at one end, to
       stop people using it as a rat run. It’s perfectly legal to drive
       down that road towards the back of the no entry sign, turn
       around, and drive back up the road. Because you didn’t pass the
       no entry sign. Just because you’re driving after a no entry sign
       doesn’t mean you passed the no entry sign.
       #Post#: 24138--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: May 27, 2024, 3:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=281]lexy[/member] the allegation is 33E, not sure how a
       no entry comes into it?
       Anyway, the allegation is that the vehicle passed these signs:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/P3V8qkH9NpsReoxYA
       [member=170]ahsan[/member] one issue is that the location is
       wrong, the signs are wholly on Glen Road. Another issue is
       whether the road is even a road for the purposes of section 142
       of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1984, as the barrier suggests
       the hospital retains control over that land as a landowner,
       which is incompatible with the road being a road to which the
       public has a right of access.
       Then we have the various TMO issues including The Newham
       (Prescribed Routes) (No. 5) Traffic Order 1998, which I have
       requested a copy of.
       However ultimately the council could wake up and point out that
       the signs are section 36 signs that don't need a TMO at all
       (though in 99% of bus gate cases the council relies on a TMO for
       some reason or another), so while there is a fair chance the
       council might mess things up, the outcome cannot be guaranteed.
       You therefore need to decide whether you want to carry on. I'll
       drop you a PM in case you'd like to be represented.
       #Post#: 26639--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham - 33E use of restricted route
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: June 18, 2024, 6:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=170]ahsan[/member] I assume you've given up but for
       future reference here is The Newham (Prescribed Routes) (No. 5)
       Traffic Order 1998
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1neAx5ZSFgUiEsvyIWvVzO-9Oxtkq7f_f/view.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page