URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 19620--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: April 13, 2024, 4:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Scientist and Saint
       link=topic=1606.msg19605#msg19605 date=1712964837]
       > [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=1606.msg19599#msg19599
       date=1712963565]
       > Frankly if it were up to me the motorways would have no limit
       at all, in Germany I found 110 / 115 mph brought a fair balance
       between making progress and fuel stops.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       In Germany there are 75% more fatal accidents on unrestricted
       sections than on ones with a speed limit.
       [/quote]
       Source?
       [/quote]
       S&S may be referring to this 2019 piece in Der Spiegel
  HTML https://www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/tempolimit-koennte-jaehrlich-bis-zu-140-todesfaelle-verhindern-a-1254504.html.
       There's also this useful article
  HTML https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2022/06/28/autobahnen-mit-tempolimit-sind-nicht-gefaehrlicher-als-autobahnen-ohne-tempolimit/<br
       />from German fact-checking website Correktiv, that cites the
       Spiegel article among others. Both articles are in German so you
       may need to rely on Google Translate.
       Having lived in Germany for a period, I did find their Autobahn
       network fairly good. As noted in one of the articles above, the
       unrestricted sections are generally only on the safer stretches
       of motorway, i.e. those that are generally quiet, no major
       junctions, away from big cities etc.
       In my experience too, most people were fairly sensible on the
       unrestricted sections and adjusted their speed to suit the road
       and conditions. Partly because, just like in the UK, just
       because one isn't speeding, doesn't mean one isn't driving
       carelessly.
       #Post#: 19624--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: slapdash
       Date: April 13, 2024, 6:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       > Frankly if it were up to me the motorways would have no limit
       at all, in Germany I found 110 / 115 mph brought a fair balance
       between making progress and fuel stops.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       About 35% (and increasing) of Autobahn 130kph, Only about 10% is
       fully derestricted.
       The balance has a variable limit based on traffic. It is often
       derestricted in the evenings.
       It seems to work reasonably well overall. The speeds you
       describe would be common.
       I don't think it would work particularly well here though, not
       until folk had a better idea of lane discipline. High speed
       differentials are difficult.
       #Post#: 19630--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: tonys
       Date: April 13, 2024, 7:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: slapdash link ---
       > I don't think it would work particularly well here though, not
       until folk had a better idea of lane discipline. High speed
       differentials are difficult.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Over here you'd have a bunch of drivers, eyes glued to their
       speedometer, making sure they maintained 111mph and didn't hit
       112.
       #Post#: 19631--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: slapdash
       Date: April 13, 2024, 7:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That would include me. But at least I'd be in the correct lane.
       #Post#: 19633--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 13, 2024, 7:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: slapdash link ---
       >
       > I don't think it would work particularly well here though, not
       until folk had a better idea of lane discipline. High speed
       differentials are difficult.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       That's where variable speed limits come in. Pretty much the
       entire length of the M25 has variable speed limits, which would
       be in force most of the time if there were no maximum limit.
       However at 3 am when you have five empty fully lit lanes, the
       only real limit should be the capabilities of the vehicle and
       the driver.
       #Post#: 19644--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: guest968
       Date: April 13, 2024, 6:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > Source?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Here
  HTML https://www.statista.com/chart/25098/fatality-rate-and-speed-limit-on-european-motorways/<br
       />and their link to an article in Der Spiegel
  HTML https://www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/tempolimit-koennte-jaehrlich-bis-zu-140-todesfaelle-verhindern-a-1254504.html
       I'm not one of those who has an unthinking "speed kills"
       position, and the Statista table shows that there really is no
       link like like that - all sorts of other factors are involved.
       Which is why the German experience is interesting, as it removes
       all the factors like vehicle condition, driver training/skills,
       roadway quality etc.  Even though there are fewer accidents on
       the unrestricted sections, because only the safest stretches are
       unrestricted, the casualty rates are higher.
       Does that mean we shouldn't have a higher limit on our
       motorways?   Not necessarily.  I'm not ideologically opposed to
       it, and I've long thought that if we are going to vary speed
       limits for traffic management purposes there'd probably be
       better buy-in from drivers for lower limits when necessary if
       they also saw the same electronic signs showing higher limits
       when possible.
       Should that higher limit top out at 100?  Possibly.  80? Why not
       - it's common enough in other countries.  120? Possibly.
       Unlimited?  Hmmm.  Driver skills start to become a problem,
       (a) for the fast driver, although different training and testing
       could perhaps be introduced.  Could even be a money-spinner - I
       can envisage that someone able to afford a super/hypercar would
       happily pay a couple of K (to the police?) for advanced training
       and the right to have a numberplate showing the speed he's rated
       for.
       But there's the (b) of all the dozy half-wits out there who
       don't pay attention, and the consequences of one of them pulling
       in front of someone doing 150 vs 70 are a lot more gripping.
       None of the issues I brought up in my earlier replies were meant
       to be "no we shouldn't cos...", but they are things which should
       be considered when balancing competing interests.  Is there
       actually any practical point to a 100 limit (other than a
       psychological sense of fair play)? We already tolerate a certain
       casualty rate, knowing it could be lowered if we lower speed
       limits, which is happening in urban areas, but we would need to
       decide to risk higher rates if we raise the limit.  And of
       course it's not just the occupants of a fast car who face a
       higher risk, it's also anybody they hit.
       The extra fuel consumption isn't just a matter for the driver's
       wallet - it means extra emissions.   And my, what an EV carrot
       that could be - EVs allowed to go at 120, or 150, petrol/diesel
       kept at 70.
       Things are often never as simple as at first they may appear,
       but the implications of a higher speed limit could be properly
       examined, and made a subject of public debate, if there was
       political will.
       In other words it aint gonna happen.
       #Post#: 19651--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: tonys
       Date: April 14, 2024, 1:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Scientist and Saint link ---
       >
       > And my, what an EV carrot that could be - EVs allowed to go at
       120, or 150, petrol/diesel kept at 70.
       --- End Quote ---
       Electricity produces emissions as well. Gas is the only source
       that can be quickly scaled up or down, so any incremental
       increase in electricity use is effectively wholly gas generated.
       The idea being pushed seems to be "it doesn't matter how much
       energy is used as long as it's electricity". I guess it's
       politically easier to encourage people to buy a new car than
       encourage energy saving.
       #Post#: 19652--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: tonys
       Date: April 14, 2024, 1:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       By the way would this requested 100mph limit apply when it's
       raining, or reduce like they do in France?
       #Post#: 19662--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 14, 2024, 6:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A completely new driving test would need to be introduced.
       #Post#: 19671--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 14, 2024, 7:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > A completely new driving test would need to be introduced.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Police drivers can go a lot faster because they have extra
       training, which isn't actually that expensive it's less than the
       cost of a racing licence.
       As a "high speed licence test" is plainly a premium service, the
       government could introduce a test fee of £5k and I still think
       they'd have people queing round the block for it. It would
       certainly help the public finances.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 9
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page