URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 19596--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: guest968
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > But being able to do 100 mph at 11 pm would save me hundreds
       of hours of slow driving per year (70 mph is slow in my book).
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes - if each year you spend about 335 hours driving 23,450
       miles at a steady 70mph (in addition to all the other hours
       driving further at lower speeds) then your saving if you could
       do that 23,450 miles at 100mph instead would just tip over 100
       hours.
       Once you're over 100 hours you can legitimately say you are "in
       the hundreds", but there is a argument that a common
       interpretation of "hundreds" means at least an integer multiple
       of hundreds, not anything over 100, so a threshold of 200 hours,
       i.e. 667 hours driving  46,690 miles at a steady 70mph vs 466.9
       hours at a steady 100.
       But however you slice it, you might like to try installing a GPS
       journey tracker on your phone, and gather actual data on how
       much of your journeys you spend at an unimpeded 70mph, and then
       factor in an honest appraisal of whether you could really have
       covered the same ground at an unimpeded 100mph, given the
       realities of other traffic, the weather, the fact that it's
       dark, etc.
       You might be surprised.
       Also, remember that the saving in time will cost you.  In theory
       power required goes up with the cube of speed. 100/70 = 1.43.
       1.43³ = 2.92, so it takes nearly 3 times as much power to travel
       at 100 compared to 70.  Assuming constant efficiency, fuel
       consumption is proportional to power output so you'd be using
       2.92 x more fuel to go 1.43 x faster, i.e. 2.92/1.43 = 2.04
       times less efficient, meaning your mpg will drop to 1/2.04, so
       basically 50% of its figure at 70mph.
       Your 100 hours saving will cost you twice as much in fuel over
       those 23,450 miles.
       Your car may well be able to give you pretty accurate
       consumption figures at a steady 70, especially as it would be
       measuring over a period of hour(s).  If so you should be able to
       estimate the cost of doing 100 instead of 70, and see if it is
       still as attractive.
       #Post#: 19597--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Another Petition should be made in my opinion to penalise the
       idiots who muck about in the overtaking and fast lanes
       apparently thinking they are driving a hearse.  :'(
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       There's already a law against that. Maybe it should be subject
       to civil enforcement, with TFL given the relevant powers to
       enforce it on the M25? It would certainly help plug the recent
       budget hole from the 900 appeals they lost.
       #Post#: 19599--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Scientist and Saint link ---
       >
       > Your 100 hours saving will cost you twice as much in fuel over
       those 23,450 miles.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'm fine with that (also considering that a higher limit doesn't
       mean one has to drive faster, it's just an option). You also
       have to factor in that driving at a more sensible speed is more
       enjoyable, and I'd rather be at my destination sooner rather
       than later given that I'm not getting any younger.
       Frankly if it were up to me the motorways would have no limit at
       all, in Germany I found 110 / 115 mph brought a fair balance
       between making progress and fuel stops.
       #Post#: 19600--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: guest968
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > 1. I do not subscribe to the view re any political bias
       arguments because I have met cp8759 (with whom I work closely)
       and Andy Foster several times. Our exchanges of views have been
       frank yet polite.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Without trying to re-litigate old cases, all I can do is to
       relate my experience.
       I described people who hate Sadiq Kahn because of the colour of
       his skin and/or his religion as “knuckle-draggers” – removed.
       A while ago I suggested (that was all) that we should be mindful
       that John Lyon’s campaign against Bristol’s CAZ penalties might
       not be entirely motivated by a purist desire for scrupulously
       correct legalities, and that given his track record of opposing
       other traffic control measures he might be one of those people
       who subscribes to the “war on the motorist” belief, and is
       simply opposed to anything which stops him driving when, where,
       how, and in what, he likes.
       Removed, and a complaint made against me.
       #Post#: 19602--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have a nice weekend everyone.  I have a couple of case to win
       next week.
       #Post#: 19604--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: guest968
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > There's already a law against that. Maybe it should be subject
       to civil enforcement, with TFL given the relevant powers to
       enforce it on the M25? It would certainly help plug the recent
       budget hole from the 900 appeals they lost.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I've spent more hours than I wish I had on the M25.   Don't
       think I ever once saw anybody driving so slowly in any
       middle/outer lanes that a convincing case could be made that
       they were impeding the safe forward progress of other vehicles,
       or  driving without reasonable consideration for other road
       users.
       #Post#: 19605--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: guest968
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > Frankly if it were up to me the motorways would have no limit
       at all, in Germany I found 110 / 115 mph brought a fair balance
       between making progress and fuel stops.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       In Germany there are 75% more fatal accidents on unrestricted
       sections than on ones with a speed limit.
       #Post#: 19606--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: guest968
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Have a nice weekend everyone.  I have a couple of case to win
       next week.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I wish you success.
       #Post#: 19607--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 12, 2024, 6:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Scientist and Saint link ---
       >
       > [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=1606.msg19599#msg19599
       date=1712963565]
       > Frankly if it were up to me the motorways would have no limit
       at all, in Germany I found 110 / 115 mph brought a fair balance
       between making progress and fuel stops.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       In Germany there are 75% more fatal accidents on unrestricted
       sections than on ones with a speed limit.
       [/quote]
       Source?
       #Post#: 19615--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Driving law proposals could see motorway speed limits raised
       to 100mph to 'reduce congestion'
   DIR By: tonys
       Date: April 13, 2024, 1:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Scientist and Saint link ---
       > It's GB News - what do you expect?
       --- End Quote ---
       I'd not looked at before seeing it cited here as a news source.
       After looking at the site I thought maybe it was just posted as
       a joke.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 9
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page