DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 962--------------------------------------------------
Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South Wimbledon,
Notice of Rejection
DIR By: tobesb
Date: July 6, 2023, 1:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all at ftla,
thank you for carrying on the super helpful work! Really
generous and kind of you.
So, the PCN was awarded for Parking Contravention code 27:
parked in a special enforcement area adjacent to a verged
lowered.
The PCN was appealled as the driver was given permission by the
owner of the drop kerb (me) to park in front of it.
1st appeal I stated this and it was rejected.
2nd appeal I stated it again and gave two previous times that
their PCNs had been cancelled for appealling for the same reason
(the driver had permission of the dropped kerb owner).
Merton Council replied with a Notice of Rejection for the
following reason (in short: parked on a double yellow):
The dropped kerb is for the purpose of a vehicle obtaining
access to their driveway. At this location there are double
yellow lines adjacent to the dropped kerb and these restrictions
apply at any time. As your vehicle was observed parked on the
double yellow lines it was parked in contravention. Vehicles can
only park adjacent to a dropped footway with the permission of
the property owner/resident during its non- controlled times.
Unfortunately, on this occasion the property owner/resident
would not be permitted to grant permission for a vehicle to park
adjacent to the dropped kerb due to the double yellow line
restrictions being in force at any time.
So Merton want to uphold this PCN but in my opinion, for a
different contravention code.
Now the wheels are not parked on the double yellow but the
bonnet is over hanging onto a double yellow. I've read here:
HTML https://www.justanswer.com/uk-traffic-law/6...nes-wheels.html<br
/>that
"The law only requires one inch of your car to overhang into the
yellow line area."
I'm now appealing to the London Tribunal service on the matter
and want to know what's the best grounds to appeal on. I'm
thinking:
- The contravention code initially stated was not broken and
that's the only thing that matters
- The wheels aren't on the double yellow
- Say both
Thank you for your advice in this matter.
Toby
HTML https://i.ibb.co/18tcdJM/GetImage.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/KFpnLzD
HTML https://i.ibb.co/cTSn7B9/Get-Image1.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/9Yk5CD0
HTML https://i.ibb.co/KNZ3ntK/p1.png
HTML https://ibb.co/VHyP6Fw
HTML https://i.ibb.co/1ZQrBg6/p2.png
HTML https://ibb.co/XXL76Q8
#Post#: 964--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: guest179
Date: July 6, 2023, 2:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
GSV pl.
#Post#: 968--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: tobesb
Date: July 6, 2023, 3:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Apologies. What does GSV stand for?
Kind regards, Toby
#Post#: 978--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: July 6, 2023, 4:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: tobesb link ---
>
> Apologies. What does GSV stand for?
>
--- End Quote ---
Google street view.
Needless to say, the PCN was issued for code 27 so they can't
now change the contravention to something else.
I'm happy to represent you at the tribunal if you'd like.
#Post#: 999--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: tobesb
Date: July 7, 2023, 9:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Dear cp8759,
here's the GSV:
HTML https://goo.gl/maps/Xfh4JJjNxUGnThaV8
I would love to be represented but don't know what that entails
sorry. I know I can have the London Tribunals in person or have
a postal decision. I have 10 days left to make an appeal.
Yours sincerely,
Toby
#Post#: 1006--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: July 7, 2023, 10:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I'll send you a PM
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/index.php?action=pm.
#Post#: 1615--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: July 20, 2023, 12:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
For future reference:
The Merton (Waiting and Loading Restriction) (CPZ SW) Order 2007
HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W8pBaKcG7L_TxJN-4c5MvHxGodyHJxZn/view?usp=sharing
The Merton (Waiting and Loading Restriction) (Amendment No. 457)
Order 2018
HTML http://The Merton (Waiting and Loading Restriction) (Amendment
No. 457) Order 2018
#Post#: 7114--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: October 10, 2023, 4:13 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1T5LOPCsVvlcS8FQY6HNlKqsJ9FzXCrhb.
#Post#: 7115--------------------------------------------------
Re: Merton, code 27 adjacent to a verged lowered, South
Wimbledon, Notice of Rejection
DIR By: DancingDad
Date: October 10, 2023, 4:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
>
> Outcome
HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1T5LOPCsVvlcS8FQY6HNlKqsJ9FzXCrhb.
>
--- End Quote ---
That will do nicely.
The outcome was expected but not the reason.
So Merton not only tried to enforce due to another contravention
but then mucked up the "true copy" of the NOR?
Ya really cannot make some council antics up.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1