URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18860--------------------------------------------------
       TFL: Paid ULEZ charge but received PCN as trip lasted beyond
       midnight
   DIR By: Wilbo
       Date: April 2, 2024, 10:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello all,
       I'm extremely careful about emissions charges etc. but
       annoyingly have still been caught out by TFL's sneaky charging
       system.
       My trip to London lasted for less than 24 hours. I paid the
       charge online, did not realise that a second charge would be due
       if staying after midnight and so have received a PCN (attached)
       with what seems to me a wildly disproportionate fine of £180
       (reduced to £90 if paid quickly). This seems very unfair to me.
       Two questions:
       1) Do I have any chance of getting out of this?
       2) Is it necessary to refer only to 'the driver' in this case or
       is that only for private fines?
       My draft appeal text is as follows:
       Dear Sir / Madam,
       I drove to London from Stroud in Gloucestershire on 16 March
       2024. Since I was entering the ULEZ charging area, I made sure
       to pay the charge on my arrival.  My receipt number is
       XXXXXXXXXX
       Nonetheless, I have received a PCN from you since my trip lasted
       until after midnight on the day in question, and thus spanned
       two charging days. Since I am not from London I was unaware of
       the midnight-to-midnight charging scheme and naturally assumed
       that only a single payment was necessary for a trip lasting less
       than 24 hours. It was not my intention to avoid the second
       charge (for 17 March 2024) and I only neglected to pay it due to
       inadequate information provided by TFL.
       I paid the charge for 16 March after accessing the following
       page, via a Google search for the terms ‘pay ULEZ charge’:
  HTML https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/pay-to-drive-in-london
       Nowhere on the page does it mention that a second charge would
       apply to a driver who entered the zone for less than 24 hours,
       but spanning two 24-hour charging periods. Since this is
       counter-intuitive (a motorist would naturally assume that only a
       single charge applied to a trip lasting less than 24 hours) the
       lack of clear information is significant. When I clicked on the
       ‘PAY’ button and followed the instructions, the online payment
       process likewise did not inform me that I would have to make two
       payments if my trip lasted beyond midnight.
       Regulation 18 (1)(a) of the Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders
       (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 makes clear
       that where an order (such as the ULEZ scheme) has been made, any
       signs should secure ‘that adequate information as to the effect
       of the order is made available to persons using the road’. None
       of the signs informing drivers of the ULEZ charge (which can be
       viewed on your website here:
  HTML https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ultra-low-emission-zone/ulez-road-signs)<br
       />make any mention of midnight-to-midnight charging, or give any
       indication that a driver would need to pay two charges if they
       remained in the zone after midnight.
       In the circumstances, and noting once again that it was not my
       intention to avoid the second charge, I would be very grateful
       if you would agree to cancel the PCN on this occasion. I am of
       course happy to make a payment of £12.50 to cover the actual
       charge for 17 March 2024, of which I was not aware until I
       received the PCN this morning.
       Kind regards etc.
       ----
       I'd be very grateful for any advice you can give. Many thanks in
       advance!
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/FqRb5ck/PCN.jpg
       #Post#: 18869--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TFL: Paid ULEZ charge but received PCN as trip lasted beyond
       midnight
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: April 2, 2024, 12:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, our esteemed administrator says all TfL PCNs are open to
       challenge and cancellation, so wait until he comes on.
       You're not the first person on here who has been caught out by
       being in a CAZ or ULEZ over midnight and only paying for one
       day.  There has been a case in Bristol (as I recall) where the
       person went into the zone at about 10 minutes to midnight, and
       paid for the following day but got a PCN in the post for the 10
       minutes.  However Bristol PCNs are unlawful but so far this
       hasn't been tested at adjudication.
       #Post#: 18883--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TFL: Paid ULEZ charge but received PCN as trip lasted beyond
       midnight
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 2, 2024, 6:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is an issue with the TFL notice of rejection template that
       may save the day. Nothing in your representation will persuade
       TFL to cancel the penalty charge, but have a look at these
       cases:
       Nayeem Haque v Transport for London (2220767288, 15 November
       2022)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KavlK0nNvWS2eI9ICkqjBQRg9-L-2mHc/view
       Mike Welch v Transport for London (2230428700, 18 November 2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ijJW4O3zHz-LOkVRi4QHmdf983n1yyJ8/view
       Lubavitch Synagogue v Transport for London (2230535074, 5
       February 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xokOkjdoJf0e5CBjBP7smnErCrMxps0m/view
       Commercial Plant Services Ltd v Transport for London
       (2240018512, 12 February 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qwj3XYfPvFZBh-ag3HYuQEUHtFXwxvHf/view
       Mathew Mathai v Transport for London (2240062219, 15 March 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QoDnU5djhqtHMDDHbPiHIhVOC7KmHxIZ/view
       The Commercial Plant case is helpful as TFL applied for a review
       that got thrown out.
       So I suggest you send your representation asap as you want to
       get it in during the discount period, then post up the notice of
       rejection when you get it and if there is an exploitable flaw
       we'll help you with the next steps.
       #Post#: 18905--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TFL: Paid ULEZ charge but received PCN as trip lasted beyond
       midnight
   DIR By: Wilbo
       Date: April 3, 2024, 6:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > There is an issue with the TFL notice of rejection template
       that may save the day
       > ...
       > So I suggest you send your representation asap as you want to
       get it in during the discount period, then post up the notice of
       rejection when you get it and if there is an exploitable flaw
       we'll help you with the next steps.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you so much, I'll do exactly as you say. Am I ok phasing
       it as I have (re: being the driver), or should I rewrite it?
       Thanks again – this forum is fantastic!
       #Post#: 18943--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TFL: Paid ULEZ charge but received PCN as trip lasted beyond
       midnight
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 3, 2024, 12:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you're both the driver and the registered keeper there's no
       reason to rephrase it.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1