URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18238--------------------------------------------------
       Identifying driver 
   DIR By: Dogdad87
       Date: March 25, 2024, 5:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I received a speeding ticket a few days ago- a notice of
       intended prosecution. I have 28 days to confirm I was driving,
       or name who was driving,
       the problem is the offence was almost 2 months ago and we’re
       genuinely struggling to remember who was driving. We both use
       the car. It was also around the time that my dad was dying ( he
       died 6 weeks ago) so that whole time is s blur.
       we’re 90% sure that wife was Driving but 90% isn’t enough!! The
       photographic evidence is useless and doesn’t show the driver as
       it’s dark.
       if I don’t nominate a driver I’ll be summoned to court and
       potentially receive £1000 fine and 6 points.if I nominate dh
       there a chance I’m wrong in which case I’m perverting the court
       of justice!!! I’m stuck!!
       neither of us are bothered about taking the rap. I just don’t
       want to create trouble for myself. WWYD
       #Post#: 18242--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: andy_foster
       Date: March 25, 2024, 7:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Dogdad87 link ---
       >
       > if I nominate dh there a chance I’m wrong in which case I’m
       perverting the court of justice!!!
       --- End Quote ---
       Can you elaborate on how naming the most likely driver would
       constitute perverting the course of justice, but only if you
       named the wrong driver?
       #Post#: 18243--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: AntonyMMM
       Date: March 25, 2024, 7:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Dogdad87 link ---
       >
       > if I nominate dh there a chance I’m wrong in which case I’m
       perverting the court of justice!!!
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Only if done deliberately  - naming the most likely (90%) driver
       is probably the way to go. But don't qualify your nomination by
       saying "probably" or anything similar.
       Yo do have the option of defending the case at court, and try to
       persuade the bench that you couldn't "with reasonable diligence"
       identify the driver. A difficult task, and an expensive one if
       you fail, but not impossible.
       #Post#: 18245--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: March 25, 2024, 7:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Yo do have the option of defending the case at court, and try
       to persuade the bench that you couldn't "with reasonable
       diligence" identify the driver. A difficult task, and an
       expensive one if you fail, but not impossible.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It can be done:
  HTML https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/nov/28/northerner.heatherstewart
       But not always:
  HTML https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/4604985.speeding-driver-demands-justice/
       #Post#: 18246--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: The Rookie
       Date: March 25, 2024, 7:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What reasonable diligence have you performed?
       Have you looked at mobile phone location services?
       Card receipts?
       Phone call logs?
       Naming the 90% likely driver is fine, even if the answer is
       wrong and they can prove it (using material you can't say is
       100% anyway) it wouldn't be PCOJ as it wasn't deliberate.
       #Post#: 18252--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: guest46
       Date: March 25, 2024, 9:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As all of the above - there's very, very little chance of PCoJ
       if you do your diligence as per The Rookie and still don't know
       - the 'authorities' aren't that interested and they to won't
       have any evidence to the contrary. 90% it was the Wife should be
       easy to run with and indeed make 100%
       Just make sure your response is unequivocal - no stating it was
       'most likely' or 'probably' as that will prompt an expensive day
       in court.
       Think about it - if every speeder used the 'I don't know'
       defence?
       #Post#: 18354--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: Dogdad87
       Date: March 26, 2024, 8:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for all of the advice - much appreciated
       We have mulled over it for the last two days and we are going to
       send the form back naming my wife. However... I have two
       questions....
       1) If we've got it wrong and the Police produce other evidence
       that contradicts our nomination, would we just be asked to
       reconsider the nomination, or would it immediately escalate into
       a more serious issue?
       2) I have 6 points already. I 'earned' these points fair and
       square. My concern is that the Police will see my previous 6
       points and think that I am trying to offload the new 3 points to
       avoid getting close to totting up. just to clarify, this is NOT
       the case but I am concerned that this may appear to be dodgy!!
       Am I overthinking this?
       #Post#: 18358--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: The Rookie
       Date: March 26, 2024, 9:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       To answer your question 3, yes.
       1/ unlikely they have anything else, but usually, yes they just
       ask ‘are you sure’ rather than making a mountain from a molehill
       2/ They won’t even look at your driving record, so no.
       #Post#: 18359--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: John Glacier
       Date: March 26, 2024, 9:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You are overthinking the whole thing. The police don't care you
       already have 6 points.
       If you nominate someone and get it wrong the police can comeback
       and ask you to reconsider. Nothing more sinister will happen.
       #Post#: 18369--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Identifying driver 
   DIR By: Dogdad87
       Date: March 26, 2024, 10:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you, that's reassuring. I just don't want to get myself
       into a situation that becomes tricky.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page