URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 21521--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group Nexus PCN
   DIR By: privates
       Date: May 4, 2024, 4:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here is the reply from them.. was in my spam without noticing
       Dear Sir/Madam,
       Thank you for your correspondence relating to your Parking
       Charge.
       The Charge was issued and the signage is displayed in compliance
       with The British Parking Association’s Approved Operator Scheme
       Code of Practice and all relevant laws and regulations.
       Clear signs at the entrance of this site and throughout inform
       drivers of the need to pay for parking, and it is not possible
       to access any part of the premises without passing multiple
       signs. Your representations are not considered a mitigating
       circumstance for appeal.
       We confirm the Charge was issued under Schedule 4 of the
       Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. As no driver details have been
       provided, we are holding the registered keeper of the vehicle
       liable.
       In light of this, on this occasion, your representations have
       been carefully considered and rejected.
       We can confirm that we will hold the Charge at the current rate
       of Ł40.00 for a further 14 days from the date of this
       correspondence. If no payment is received within this period,
       and no further appeal to POPLA is made, the Charge will escalate
       and further costs may be added.
       #Post#: 21541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group Nexus PCN
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 4, 2024, 6:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So, what was the date of their rejection of your appeal? Does it
       contain your POPLA code? Whilst it gives you 28 days to respond,
       you actually have 32 days. Are you in time to make your POPLA
       appeal?
       You never showed us what you wrote in your appeal. Have they
       rebutted every point you raised?
       #Post#: 21544--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group Nexus PCN
   DIR By: privates
       Date: May 4, 2024, 7:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > So, what was the date of their rejection of your appeal? Does
       it contain your POPLA code? Whilst it gives you 28 days to
       respond, you actually have 32 days. Are you in time to make your
       POPLA appeal?
       >
       > You never showed us what you wrote in your appeal. Have they
       rebutted every point you raised?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I had appealed the above as advised by b789.
       It includes the POPLA code and the date of the email is 26/03
       which means its been 39 days since the day  :(
       #Post#: 21545--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group Nexus PCN
   DIR By: privates
       Date: May 4, 2024, 7:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: b789 link ---
       >
       > No. That is not worded appropriately. Additionally, you have
       not included a question about the ambiguity of their reasonable
       cause of action. What evidence do they have that the driver
       didn't validate a parking session through the parking terminals,
       or why they cannot evidence a payment to cover full duration of
       a parking session. Is it one or the other?
       >
       > You should start the appeal stating that you are appealing as
       the keeper:
       >
       > 1. I appeal as keeper. I am under no legal obligation to
       identify the driver and I decline to do so.
       >
       > 2. You have purported to invoke the statutory procedure for
       keeper liability under Schedule 4 to the Protection of Freedoms
       Act 2012 (PoFA). However, you have failed to comply with the
       strict requirements of PoFA paragraph 9(2)(e)(i) which states:
       >
       > [quote]A notice which is to be relied on as a notice to keeper
       for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) is given in accordance
       with this paragraph if the following requirements are met:
       >
       > The notice must - state that the creditor does not know both
       the name of the driver and a current address for service for the
       driver and invite the keeper — to pay the unpaid parking
       charges.
       --- End Quote ---
       3. As there is no legal presumption that the keeper of a vehicle
       was its driver (as opposed, for example, to being a passenger)
       on any particular occasion, GroupNexus is unable to pursue me as
       driver.


       4. GroupNexus have not evidenced any reasonable cause for
       requesting the keepers data from the DVLA. An ambiguous
       allegation that the driver did not validate a parking session
       through the parking terminals or why GroupNexus cannot evidence
       a payment to cover full duration of a parking session does not
       satisfy the criteria for a reasonable cause of action according
       to the KADOE rules. I will be making a complaint to the DVLA
       about this.
       5. Furthermore, GroupNexus has failed to including evidence of
       the signage that is purported to have given rise to a contract
       by conduct. Neither has GroupNexus shown that it has landowner
       authority to issue PCNs in its own name.
       6. The inadequate signage and lack of evidence of landowner
       authority evidence shows that GroupNexus have failed to
       adequately prove that the driver is liable. As the keeper, I
       reserve the right to expand on these points at POPLA should
       GroupNexus fail to cancel this PCN.
       [/quote]
       This was the appeal that had been made
       #Post#: 21549--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group Nexus PCN
   DIR By: b789
       Date: May 4, 2024, 7:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, it’s too late to appeal to POPLA. You would have been able
       to raise all the points at POPLA and they would have to answer
       each one. If they failed to answer or rebut each and every
       point, you would have likely won.
       You are now in a “limbo” phase. You are going to receive debt
       collector letters which you can safely ignore. They are solely
       used to try and intimidate you into paying up. They use scary
       words like “bailiff” and “CCJ” but are powerless to do anything.
       What you are waiting to find out is if/when GroupNexus decide to
       issue a Letter of Claim. Should they do that, come back and
       you’ll get further advice. We don’t neeed to know about debt
       collector demands. Ignore those.
       If you change address any time in the next 6 years, make sure
       you instruct the DPO at GroupNexus to rectify your address for
       service and to erase your old address.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page