URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 17034--------------------------------------------------
       Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: ConfusedD Date: March 9, 2024, 6:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We just found this parking charge notice, which we must have
       received last week, but it got tucked under the front door mat
       and went unnoticed. So, it's already been 9 days past due.
       The PCN was issued for parking in Queens School South Bushey for
       16 minutes.
       This is where we go on a weekly basis to pick up our kid after
       cricket club. We usually pay for parking as we stay to watch the
       game, but that day we only did drop off and pickup. We parked in
       front of the building where others were also parked. My partner
       went inside to pick up the kid, and it took some time as he had
       to remove all the cricket gear. However, I was in the car the
       entire time outside the building, not in the parking bay.
       Looking at the ticket, I assume the time is calculated since we
       entered the South Wing premises.
       I would like to appeal based on the mitigating circumstances, as
       there were other cars parked in the front, and had I known the
       kid would take longer, I would have moved inside the parking
       area and paid.
       The forum has been incredibly helpful, and everyone has been so
       kind to help me in the past. So, do you think its worth
       appealing?
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 17039--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: b789 Date: March 9, 2024, 8:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Remaining in the car irrelevant as a mitigating factor. By
       remaining for 16 minutes, the driver has exceeded any
       consideration period which should be a minimum of 5 minutes.
       Can you get photos of the actual signage at the location?
       Have you tried Plan A yet? Plan A is to contact the landowner
       (possibly the school in this instance) and asked them to get the
       PCN cancelled? That is by far the easiest method to make this
       disappear. Plan B will be an appeal to PE. They are unlikely to
       feel sorry for the driver or keeper (who can be liable as the
       NtK is PoFA compliant).
       If Plan B fails, you then move on to Plan C which would be an
       appeal to POPLA where mitigation is not considered at all. POPLA
       will only consider legal points and breaches of the BPA Code of
       Practice (CoP) so you need to throw as many appeal points as
       possible at them. PE has to rebut all the appeal points. The
       keeper only has to win on one.
       There are possibly other factors that can be appealed on such as
       signage. Having looked at the location in GSV, whilst the
       pictures are from May 2022, there does not appear to be any
       adequate signage at the entrance to warn the driver that they
       are entering private and controlled by an unregulated private
       parking company.
       The BPA CoP section 19.2 states:
       Entrance signs play an important part in establishing a parking
       contract and deterring trespassers. Therefore, as well as the
       signs you must have telling drivers about the terms and
       conditions for parking, you must also have a standard form of
       entrance sign at the entrance to the parking area. Entrance
       signs
       must tell drivers that the car park is managed and that there
       are terms and conditions they must be aware of. Entrance signs
       must follow some minimum general principles and be in a standard
       format. The size of the sign must take into account the expected
       speed of vehicles approaching the car park, and it is
       recommended that you follow Department for Transport guidance on
       this. See Appendix B for an example of an entrance sign and more
       information about their use.
       A standard form of entrance sign must be placed at the entrance
       to the parking area. There may be reasons why this is
       impractical, for example:
       • when there is no clearly defined car park entrance
       • when the car park is very small
       • at forecourts in front of shops and petrol filling stations
       • at parking areas where general parking is not permitted
       #Post#: 17077--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: ConfusedD Date: March 10, 2024, 7:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=b789 link=topic=1454.msg17039#msg17039
       date=1709993618]
       Remaining in the car irrelevant as a mitigating factor. By
       remaining for 16 minutes, the driver has exceeded any
       consideration period which should be a minimum of 5 minutes.
       Can you get photos of the actual signage at the location?
       Have you tried Plan A yet? Plan A is to contact the landowner
       (possibly the school in this instance) and asked them to get the
       PCN cancelled? That is by far the easiest method to make this
       disappear. Plan B will be an appeal to PE. They are unlikely to
       feel sorry for the driver or keeper (who can be liable as the
       NtK is PoFA compliant).
       If Plan B fails, you then move on to Plan C which would be an
       appeal to POPLA where mitigation is not considered at all. POPLA
       will only consider legal points and breaches of the BPA Code of
       Practice (CoP) so you need to throw as many appeal points as
       possible at them. PE has to rebut all the appeal points. The
       keeper only has to win on one.
       There are possibly other factors that can be appealed on such as
       signage. Having looked at the location in GSV, whilst the
       pictures are from May 2022, there does not appear to be any
       adequate signage at the entrance to warn the driver that they
       are entering private and controlled by an unregulated private
       parking company.
       The BPA CoP section 19.2 states:
       Entrance signs play an important part in establishing a parking
       contract and deterring trespassers. Therefore, as well as the
       signs you must have telling drivers about the terms and
       conditions for parking, you must also have a standard form of
       entrance sign at the entrance to the parking area. Entrance
       signs
       must tell drivers that the car park is managed and that there
       are terms and conditions they must be aware of. Entrance signs
       must follow some minimum general principles and be in a standard
       format. The size of the sign must take into account the expected
       speed of vehicles approaching the car park, and it is
       recommended that you follow Department for Transport guidance on
       this. See Appendix B for an example of an entrance sign and more
       information about their use.
       A standard form of entrance sign must be placed at the entrance
       to the parking area. There may be reasons why this is
       impractical, for example:
       • when there is no clearly defined car park entrance
       • when the car park is very small
       • at forecourts in front of shops and petrol filling stations
       • at parking areas where general parking is not permitted
       [/quote]
       Thank you for your response.
       We will head out today to take pictures, both at the location
       waiting area where the car was parked and at the entrance to the
       car park where the pictures was taken.
       I tried plan A, but the school simply stated that they have no
       control over this, and its something we need to take up with the
       parking company. People parking there should either pay at the
       parking meter or via the app. There is no free parking, and
       clearly sitting in the car makes no difference.
       I will appeal our Plan B to the PE, however if it progresses to
       pplan C worried that the discount amount will no longer apply.
       #Post#: 17079--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: b789 Date: March 10, 2024, 8:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Maybe a reminder to the school (assuming that they may have
       contracted the PPC to operate there) that they are jointly and
       severally liable for the actions of their agents may spur some
       recognition that the PPC don't just operate there without
       licence.
       Also, a question about who is the monkey and who is the organ
       grinder in their contractual agreement with the PPC may induce a
       comment that is more than a shrug-off.
       #Post#: 17128--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: ConfusedD Date: March 11, 2024, 7:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=b789 link=topic=1454.msg17079#msg17079
       date=1710076048]
       Maybe a reminder to the school (assuming that they may have
       contracted the PPC to operate there) that they are jointly and
       severally liable for the actions of their agents may spur some
       recognition that the PPC don't just operate there without
       licence.
       Also, a question about who is the monkey and who is the organ
       grinder in their contractual agreement with the PPC may induce a
       comment that is more than a shrug-off.
       [/quote]
       I'm not sure if I fully understand this, but I now have a
       contact email, whom I can email about my PCN, as I feel that
       asking for a minimum fine of £60 for parking for only 16 minutes
       is outrageous. However, I would appreciate some support on what
       to check about the contractual agreement.
       #Post#: 17136--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: b789 Date: March 11, 2024, 9:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Next time you go to the school, take some pictures of the
       signage and show us.
       The school telling you that they cannot do anything about it and
       that you should contact the parking company is a "shrug off",
       especially as it is likely that it is the school that have
       contracted them in the first place.
       Contacting Parking Eye will be about as useful as a poke in the
       arm with a sharp stick. They are only interested in one thing...
       your money. It is the school you should be complaining to about
       being invoiced for £100 by a third party, especially as you are
       probably charged by them for extracurricular activities anyway.
       As always, Plan A is the best and simplest option. Perhaps go
       higher up the management food chain with your complaint to get
       more than a shrug off. Plan B is appeal to PE and hope your
       "mitigation" pull at the heartstrings of a ruthless company that
       is only interested in how much they can squeeze out of you. Plan
       C will be an appeal to POPLA if/when Plan B is rejected.
       Unless you can convince a POPLA assessor that their client, PE,
       have issued the PCN in breach of any law or BPA rule,, then that
       is doomed to failure too. But never mind. A POPLA loss means
       nothing in the scheme of things. You would then be in limbo
       until/when Plan C kicks in.
       Plan C is a court claim. Recent history shows that for a single
       PCN PE will do on elf two things. They will either farm the
       claim out to external debt collectors, most likely DCBLimited.
       They will add £70 to the clam and send you a load of useless
       letters threatening all sorts of nasty things like a CCJ or
       bailiffs. It's just words and they are powerless to do anything
       in reality. Eventually they will bring in the other arm of their
       business, DCB Legal who will eventually send you a Letter of
       Claim (LoC) and then an actual claim. This is actually good
       because it is 99.99% guaranteed that f you defend the claim
       robustly using a template defence, they will, eventually,
       discontinue the claim and then it is over.
       The other possibility is the PE will issue a claim themselves,
       without using a third party solicitor. This is also good because
       they have, in the last year, been adding £20 to the original
       £100 charge which is not allowed. They have been so successful
       adding the £20 charge because the majority of victims who have
       not discovered their website of the MSE parking forums end up
       paying out of ignorance and fear, that they have now increased
       the add on to £25.
       Whatever you decide to do, if you are adamant that this is an
       unfair charge and ou are up for a fight that you have a good
       chance of winning, then follow the plans described above.
       #Post#: 17154--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: ConfusedD Date: March 11, 2024, 3:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=b789 link=topic=1454.msg17136#msg17136
       date=1710165640]
       Next time you go to the school, take some pictures of the
       signage and show us.
       The school telling you that they cannot do anything about it and
       that you should contact the parking company is a "shrug off",
       especially as it is likely that it is the school that have
       contracted them in the first place.
       Contacting Parking Eye will be about as useful as a poke in the
       arm with a sharp stick. They are only interested in one thing...
       your money. It is the school you should be complaining to about
       being invoiced for £100 by a third party, especially as you are
       probably charged by them for extracurricular activities anyway.
       As always, Plan A is the best and simplest option. Perhaps go
       higher up the management food chain with your complaint to get
       more than a shrug off.
       [/quote]
       Today, I tried calling the school again and got hold of an email
       address. I've already sent an email explaining the mitigating
       circumstances. Also, I spoke with another parent who confirmed
       there's a 15-minute grace period for parking. I remember seeing
       it myself last year before paying the parking charge. Since we
       were just a minute over, I'm bit hopeful fingers crossed!!
       Do we happen to have any recent templates or success stories
       with the ParkingEye company?
       I've attached the pictures I took from the site last week for
       your reference.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 17155--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: ConfusedD Date: March 11, 2024, 3:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       More pictures from the school
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 113487--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Parkingeye PCN - Queens School South Bushey - South
       By: Userhkp Date: March 16, 2026, 9:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please can somebody reshare the photos of the signage. Even more
       useful to me, if they could send picture of the signage as of
       now during the evening / night time.
       I received a ticket here. Have never visited the site before.
       Did not see any signage. It was dark and I want to dispute.
       I don't want to make the journey back to the car park to take
       the photos.
       *****************************************************