URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18874--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 2, 2024, 1:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OK well if they contest the appeal we could develop the
       argument.
       #Post#: 19278--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: AceKingPin
       Date: April 8, 2024, 5:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello [member=1]cp8759[/member], I've just received the evidence
       pack in which my original challenge text was finally provided to
       me:
       "Q: Please describe why you want to challenge the penalty charge
       notice
       A: The lighting around the area and insufficient illumination of
       signage in advance of approaching the bus lane are the main
       reasons.
       I was driving the vehicle at a time where street lighting was
       off, and I veered into the left lane assuming it was the safest
       lane to travel with and being uncertain whether the right lane
       represented a fork to force me to turn right. I didn't see
       adequate signage when approaching the lane (I don't think street
       lighting and signing was lit) that there was a restriction in
       that lane. I only realised after I saw the double dashed lines
       that gave way to the right lane traffic that I may have been in
       the wrong lane. But further to not seeing any visible signage on
       my approach, I was not aware that the validity of it extended to
       after midnight either. I thought it was safer for me to continue
       to proceed rather than reverse my car and then move to the right
       lane."
       I would like to ask if you would be prepared to represent or
       assist me in this matter at all? My wife is the registered
       keeper and I was the driver at the time of the contravention,
       which has been recorded.
       I'm happy to request switching the hearing to a telephone
       hearing as required, and I would maintain that I should still be
       allowed the discounted £65 rate given my earlier email
       submission and the council's failure to provide me with the
       above evidence text in time.
       #Post#: 19282--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 8, 2024, 6:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have sent you a PM.
       #Post#: 19344--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: guest17
       Date: April 8, 2024, 3:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I understand that the camera used at this site is VCA/SoS
       approved for parking contraventions under Art 2 The Civil
       Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (Approved Devices)
       (England) Order 2007.
       I'll leave it to others to determine if this provides wriggle
       room in a moving traffic case.
       Mike
       #Post#: 19350--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 8, 2024, 4:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Unfortunately, it matters not. Petition re homogeneity to
       follow.  ;D
       #Post#: 21581--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: May 4, 2024, 6:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Outcome
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fBrtK_vLGHU89FD8w1FkEZNCpUufa5iz/view.
       #Post#: 21591--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: May 5, 2024, 5:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well done.  An illuminating decision.  :)
       #Post#: 21603--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: roythebus
       Date: May 5, 2024, 8:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Or rather a not illuminated decision. :) Well done to all.
       I've found from my boss who lives in the area that a number of
       similar bus gates exist in the Harrow area, mainly to stop
       residential roads being used at through routes by lorries which
       is understandable I suppose. But these roads are usually bus
       routes as well, hence the bus gates.
       The other main reason is the cash they generate for the council.
       #Post#: 21741--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: AceKingPin
       Date: May 7, 2024, 8:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks to [member=1]cp8759[/member] for representing me and
       successfully arguing my case. Sadly the council have now
       improved the lighting from what it was at, at the time of the
       PCN.
       But I'd say that their inability to provide key information
       (such as CCTV and original appeal text) within a reasonable
       time-frame could make them liable as well, given the 12th March
       misleading around keeping the discount on hold (when it wasn't)
       #Post#: 21788--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Harrow Code 33E Route restricted for Buses/Cycles/Taxis -
       Camrose Avenue (Again!)
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: May 7, 2024, 5:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: AceKingPin link ---
       >
       > Sadly the council have now improved the lighting from what it
       was at, at the time of the PCN.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       On the other hand we can hope that the improved lighting will
       result in fewer contraventions and fewer PCNs being issued in
       the fist place.
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 5
   DIR Previous Page