DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 15799--------------------------------------------------
Waltham Forest, 47 stopped on a restricted bust stop or stand,
St james Street,
DIR By: Purple26
Date: February 17, 2024, 12:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi
I received a pcn for above. Would like some advice if it is
worth appealing as my tyres were barely in the bus stand .
Please see documents in link below.
Thanks.
HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/12TmFPczNRPqJNb-LQPsVFXdSml4OFFKV
#Post#: 15802--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest, 47 stopped on a restricted bust stop or
stand, St james Street,
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: February 17, 2024, 2:06 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
What a money-grubbing PCN !! Disgusting really but difficult to
counter. London councils are venal and rapacious, so if you
submit reps will send you a Fob-Off letter. You then must
decide whether to take them to London Tribunals. Unless the PCN
contains fatal errors this would have to be on a de minimis
basis, (offence too trivial for enforcement). However it would
depend on what adjudicator you got "on the day", as some won't
countenance 10 thousandths of a inch inside a bus stop as de
minimis. More shame them.
The main point here is that it isn't where your wheels are, it's
where the car/vehicle is. Other OPs on here have been walloped
for intruding into yellow lines and saying their wheels weren't
on the lines. But their vehicle was within the lines. However
see what the others say.
#Post#: 15812--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest, 47 stopped on a restricted bust stop or
stand, St james Street,
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: February 18, 2024, 7:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This is a useful case re camera authorisation. No need to
mention it.
HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1dFUa8HEcUh2HyuDprMyvoP1NZ67kMZWA
*******
Dear Waltham Forest
Ref: PCN VRM
I make these formal representations against the PCN.
1. The evidence shows no upright sign details.
2. The incursion was de minimis.
3. I put you to strict proof that the camera used to capture the
alleged contravention has the necessary authorisation from the
VCA.
In light of the above, please cancel the PCN.
Name (Registered keeper)
Address
#Post#: 15839--------------------------------------------------
Re: Waltham Forest, 47 stopped on a restricted bust stop or
stand, St james Street,
DIR By: Purple26
Date: February 18, 2024, 4:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the advice chaps and draft letter hippocrates. I
will make a representation and keep you posted.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1