URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18939--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth Streatham high road 46 Stopped on a red route
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 3, 2024, 11:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The notice of rejection has the same flaw as the ones in these
       cases:
       Nayeem Haque v Transport for London (2220767288, 15 November
       2022)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KavlK0nNvWS2eI9ICkqjBQRg9-L-2mHc/view
       Mike Welch v Transport for London (2230428700, 18 November 2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ijJW4O3zHz-LOkVRi4QHmdf983n1yyJ8/view
       Lubavitch Synagogue v Transport for London (2230535074, 5
       February 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xokOkjdoJf0e5CBjBP7smnErCrMxps0m/view
       Commercial Plant Services Ltd v Transport for London
       (2240018512, 12 February 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qwj3XYfPvFZBh-ag3HYuQEUHtFXwxvHf/view
       Mathew Mathai v Transport for London (2240062219, 15 March 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QoDnU5djhqtHMDDHbPiHIhVOC7KmHxIZ/view
       It does seem that by repeatedly chasing the video you have
       stopped TFL from increasing the penalty sooner, which is both
       good and bad. On the one hand the you can't show that the
       ambiguous wording has put you at a clear-cut disadvantage, but
       that does not wholly negate the argument because as Mr Chan said
       in the review of the Commercial Plant case, a motorist reading
       your rejection might think the full penalty amount is £80 and
       might pay that amount on day 28 and then end up with a charge
       certificate.
       The positive news is that if an appeal is received when the
       penalty is at the £80 rate, TFL only seek £80 at the tribunal
       stage, so you might get a free roll of the dice.
       The only risk is that the penalty might go up to £160 between
       the time when you file an appeal and the time when the tribunal
       notifies Transport for London of the appeal, one way to mitigate
       this issue would be to pay £80 today but appeal anyway, knowing
       that in all likelihood if you lose TFL would not seek the
       additional £80, but if you win you'll get the £80 back.
       The real problem you have is that the tribunal deadline to
       appeal is midnight tonight, so you only have a few hours left to
       make a decision.
       I'm going to send you a PM with some options should you wish to
       engage me as your representative.
       Incidentally if you appeal you ge the video as part of the
       appeals process, which might be the quickest way of getting it
       given the delays you've encountered.
       #Post#: 18948--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth Streatham high road 46 Stopped on a red route
   DIR By: Ken Masters
       Date: April 3, 2024, 12:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=1]cp8759[/member] thank you have replied to your PM.
       #Post#: 34425--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth Streatham high road 46 Stopped on a red route
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: August 23, 2024, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Outcome
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AdU7zilYOYsaYYMbi9P7aMDVYUsAHQ1R/view.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page