URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 15186--------------------------------------------------
       PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge refused -
       Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: volavola
       Date: February 7, 2024, 11:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello,
       Hoping for some advice on all this.
       My partner parked in Colchester recently, at St Johns Green.
       Whereby there is a number of bays for free parking, just no
       return within 2 hours. When she returned the second time there
       was a ticket (attached)
       Before the 2 hour period was up my partner returned to the car
       and moved it from Point A to Point B, as shown in the image.
       Also the YouTube video here of dashcam footage here:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPznPeRzN9Y
       I put all this information on the appeal. Along with noting that
       the two locations whilst both St Johns Green, are listed
       seperately in the TRO (attached image of that too).
       It just seems a bit mad that it's been denied on the valves
       apparently being in the same location on the wheel. When the car
       was moved 1 minute up the road to another location.
       I guess just wait now for 28 days and the a formal appeal? Seems
       to a whole lot of waste time and energy all round.
       Edit: Attached rejection of informal appeal.
       Thanks
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 15210--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: February 7, 2024, 6:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Looks like some mendacity on the part of the CEO re tyre valve
       positions ! However it does look as if they treat all the
       separate bays that come under St John's Green as one area for
       parking, with identical restrictions, so moving from one bay to
       another does not trump the 2 hour limit.
       Clearly your informal challenge has been rejected, so the next
       stage is the Notice to Owner, where you can submit a formal
       representations.
       All you can do at the NtO stage is state the facts; that you
       moved the car before the 2 hours was up, and re-parked elsewhere
       in St Johns Green in a totally separate bay. You might not get
       away with this because the TRO lists the relevant bays under one
       single location, so the contravention is, in theory, made out. I
       think your wifes "clever wheeze" to thwart the 2 hour rule may
       not be valid. Certainly the council are unlikely to give way, so
       you'd have to take them to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. The
       discount option is lost at the Notice to Owner stage, by the
       way.
       The other aspect is the PCN itself and its content. We often
       find fatal errors in PCN that on their own, win appeals even if
       the contravention is made out. This is because a learned judge,
       some years ago stated that, (for parking PCN penalties), that a
       penalty can be demanded if a set of statutory conditions exists.
       An error on a PCN can be such that it is a procedural
       impropriety and thus the PCN is void.
       So please post-up all of the PCN, top to bottom and all sides.
       #Post#: 15220--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: volavola
       Date: February 8, 2024, 5:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for your reply.
       Yes it does seem that it would be almost impossible for the tyre
       vales to have been in the same position, given the length the
       car was moved as shown in the video.
       I had assumed (maybe wrongly) that the as the locations are
       listed seperately in the TRO, that these would be counted as
       different locations.
       i.e. parked initially in St John's Green and then subsequently
       moved to St John's Green (central Section) - Page 205 of the TRO
       here:
  HTML https://tro.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/TRO/Colchester/CH071.pdf
       I have also uploaded the PCN below (both sides)
       Thanks
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 15362--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: volavola
       Date: February 10, 2024, 8:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is anyone with a bit of experience able to advise if the two
       locations are different, if in the TRO they are listed under the
       seperate headings?
       #Post#: 15372--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: February 10, 2024, 10:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TRO lists the relevant bays under one single location, so the
       contravention is, in theory, made out.
       It's not IMO. The contravention of returning within the 2-hour
       period might be made out, but the TRO lists 3 distinct areas
       under the St. John's Green heading:
       St. John's Green;
       SJG (Central);
       SJG (north-eastern).
       The bays themselves are separated by areas of waiting and other
       restrictions.
       IMO, it is NOT the case that a vehicle which moves bay* is
       subject to anything other than that bay's primary restriction.
       I've read cases where the 'no return' aspect has been considered
       as a 'zonal' restriction but only where the same restrictions
       apply throughout. In any event, this is not the alleged
       contravention.
       *- this is the most worrying part of their reply for me. It
       suggests that the authority do NOT accept that the car moved
       because it is totally irrelevant whether the valves were in the
       same place or not if their argument is that all bays are
       covered.
       I would focus on this point at formal reps.
       From ** to *** my car was parked o/s *** in a 2-hr bay situated
       between nos. *** and *** on the *** side of St. John's
       Green(this is listed as being the *** area in the TRO). At
       approx.*** the car left this bay and was re-positioned o/s no.
       *** in the bay which runs between nos. *** and *** SJG(listed
       under *** area in the TRO).
       The car was not parked for more than the prescribed period in
       either of these distinct bays and therefore the contravention
       did not occur and the PCN must be cancelled.
       I would draw the authority's attention to the following
       statement in their letter dated **** rejecting my initial
       representations:
       ************
       Before considering these reps, the authority must satisfy
       themselves as to whether the car did or did not move between the
       CEO's two observations at ** and ***. If they agree, then the
       issue of valve positions is at best redundant and at worst
       indicative of unsound reasoning. If they disagree and believe
       that the car remained stationary, then they should issue a
       Notice of Rejection and I would be content to let the
       adjudicator decide the matter.
       Just some thoughts for later.
       #Post#: 15377--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: volavola
       Date: February 10, 2024, 12:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you very much for taking the time to reply.
       I understand what you are saying in terms of a reply at the
       formal stage, and this was the information I put in the informal
       appeal.
       Proving the car moved is quite easy with the video footage,
       however if they then do agree that it has moved is it not that
       we've then admitted to overstaying as St John's Green and the
       PCN would still need to be paid - if it counts as one single
       area anyway?
       Do we have any kind of chance of winning this, or is it just a
       better bet to pay at the discounted rate?
       #Post#: 15385--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: February 10, 2024, 3:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       if it counts as one single area anyway?
       And where did you get this idea?
       #Post#: 15395--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: mrmustard
       Date: February 11, 2024, 3:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please post an image of the  bay sign, it must give clear
       information
       #Post#: 15436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: volavola
       Date: February 11, 2024, 8:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       >
       > if it counts as one single area anyway?
       >
       > And where did you get this idea?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Apologies, I misread your reply. I thought the first line was
       you saying that the contravention was made out.
       Also previous the reply from Incandescent who said they treat
       all bays at St Johns Green as one area. So has led to a bit of
       confusion on my part as to which is correct.
       #Post#: 15437--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - Moved location, and footage - Informal challenge
       refused - Valve Position (North Essex Parking Partnership)
   DIR By: volavola
       Date: February 11, 2024, 8:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: mrmustard link ---
       >
       > Please post an image of the  bay sign, it must give clear
       information
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Hi, thanks for your reply. Here's the picture of the sign from
       the bay where the ticket was issued, it's identical on the one
       at the first set of bays also.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page