URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 16803--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: March 4, 2024, 7:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are no templates, but post up your draft here for review
       and if it needs tidying up, we'll suggest what alterations are
       needed. The basis of your response to an NtO is 'procedural
       impropriety', one of the statutory grounds in the Traffic
       Management Act 2004 under which your PCN was issued.
       #Post#: 18543--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: FaintPanda
       Date: March 29, 2024, 3:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       NtO Received - Images Attached
  HTML https://imgur.com/fvOebW1.jpg
  HTML https://imgur.com/rjISTUR.jpg
  HTML https://imgur.com/ZEcXAC1.jpg
  HTML https://imgur.com/nWBwM46.jpg
  HTML https://imgur.com/6UPw8oE.jpg
  HTML https://imgur.com/R2gCtvD.jpg
       #Post#: 18544--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: FaintPanda
       Date: March 29, 2024, 3:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Draft Formal Appeal - I would love some feedback on what should
       be modified here.
       To Whom It May Concern,
       I am writing to appeal the Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) issued to
       me on 1st Feb 2024 for the contravention code "23 - Parked in a
       parking place or area not designated for that class of vehicle."
       I firmly believe that the PCN was unjustly issued due to
       procedural impropriety on the part of the Hereford Council.
       During my informal appeal process, I explicitly brought to the
       attention of the Hereford Council the failure to adhere to the
       procedural requirements outlined in the Road Management Act
       2004. Despite highlighting this crucial aspect and providing
       supporting evidence, the council failed to acknowledge or
       address this issue in their response to my informal appeal.
       Furthermore, it has been demonstrated in previous cases that
       contravention code "23" has been successfully challenged due to
       motorists' lack of understanding regarding the class of vehicle
       designated for the parking space [Reference, A, B, C]. The PCN
       received only states that the vehicle was parked in a "Parking
       place or area not designated for that class of vehicle", the PCN
       does not contain any wording around what class of vehicles are
       permitted.
       According to Part 2, Chapter 1, Section 3 (1), Paragraph C,
       [that if a notice to owner is served despite the representations
       mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), representations against the
       penalty charge must be made to the enforcement authority in the
       form and manner and at the time specified in the notice to
       owner]. However, the PCN which was issued fails to meet this
       requirement. This oversight on the part of the council
       constitutes a clear violation of the Road Management Act 2004
       and undermines the fairness and legality of the PCN issued to
       me.
       In light of the above, I kindly request that the Hereford
       Council review my appeal and withdraw the PCN issued to me. I
       trust that upon further examination of the facts presented, the
       council will acknowledge the procedural impropriety and rectify
       this matter accordingly.
       Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to
       receiving a prompt response regarding the status of my appeal.
       References:
       A: Mary Harding v Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
       (2160271291, 26 July 2016)
       [
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QtmX9lLTLTQx6uRa9NDzJvfXcJuhzylV]
       B: Yuriy Myronovyh V The City Of Edinburgh Council
       (ED00154-2107, 04 October 2021)
       [
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OUYGSdtOnnkZXwyyv3pZrXjhnyjMAMbe]
       C: Robert Piatt v Manchester City Council (MC00876-2010, 15
       October 2020)
       [
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XqKhehvagEzi4MgvPQZEk65cZ2VuCDDg]
       Yours sincerely,
       #Post#: 18552--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: March 29, 2024, 4:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       YOu are not "appealing", you are submitting
       "representations".Appeals are considered at the adjudicators at
       the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. Councils hate being told their
       PCNs are non-compliant, so just ignore informal reps on this
       basis, thus forcing you to TPT. However I will be very
       interested in what their inevitable rejection letter says !
       #Post#: 18553--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: FaintPanda
       Date: March 29, 2024, 4:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for the feedback [member=12]Incandescent[/member] - I
       have tweaked some of the wording. Feedback is welcome.
       To Whom It May Concern,
       I am writing to challenge the Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) issued
       to me on 1st Feb 2024 for the contravention code "23 - Parked in
       a parking place or area not designated for that class of
       vehicle." I firmly believe that the PCN was unjustly issued due
       to procedural impropriety on the part of the Hereford Council.
       During my informal representation, I explicitly brought to the
       attention of Hereford Council the failure to adhere to the
       procedural requirements outlined in the Road Management Act
       2004. Despite highlighting this crucial aspect and providing
       supporting evidence, the council failed to acknowledge or
       address this issue in their response to my informal challenge.
       Furthermore, it has been demonstrated in previous cases that
       contravention code "23" has been successfully challenged due to
       motorists' lack of understanding regarding the class of vehicle
       designated for the parking space [Reference, A, B, C]. The PCN
       received only states that the vehicle was parked in a "Parking
       place or area not designated for that class of vehicle", the PCN
       does not contain any wording around what class of vehicles are
       permitted.
       According to the Traffic Management Act (2004) Part 2, Chapter
       1, Section 3 (1), Paragraph C [that if a notice to owner is
       served despite the representations mentioned in sub-paragraph
       (b), representations against the penalty charge must be made to
       the enforcement authority in the form and manner and at the time
       specified in the notice to owner]. However, the PCN which was
       issued fails to meet this requirement. This oversight on the
       part of the council constitutes a clear violation of the Road
       Management Act 2004 and undermines the fairness and legality of
       the PCN issued to me.
       In light of the above, I kindly request that Hereford Council
       review the evidence and withdraw the PCN issued to me. I trust
       that upon further examination of the facts presented, the
       council will acknowledge the procedural impropriety and rectify
       this matter accordingly.
       Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to
       receiving a prompt response.
       References:
       A: Mary Harding v Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
       (2160271291, 26 July 2016)
       [
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QtmX9lLTLTQx6uRa9NDzJvfXcJuhzylV]
       B: Yuriy Myronovyh V The City Of Edinburgh Council
       (ED00154-2107, 04 October 2021)
       [
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OUYGSdtOnnkZXwyyv3pZrXjhnyjMAMbe]
       C: Robert Piatt v Manchester City Council (MC00876-2010, 15
       October 2020)
       [
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XqKhehvagEzi4MgvPQZEk65cZ2VuCDDg]
       #Post#: 18560--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: March 29, 2024, 7:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is not the Road Management Act 2004, but the Traffic
       Management Act 2004, however the PCN is not compliant with the
       regulation that supports operation of the Act, so you should
       state this, not the TMA2004 -  The Civil Enforcement of Road
       Traffic Contraventions (Representations and Appeals) (England)
       Regulations 2022
       These regulations are supported by Section 80 and 89 of the TMA
       2004
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/18/section/80
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/18/section/89
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2022/9780348232752/contents
       In other words, the TMA 2004 gives powers to government
       ministers to introduce regulations related to the provisions
       contained in the Act.
       So, delete all reference to the TMA 2004, and substitute with
       the title of the regulations.
       #Post#: 18716--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: March 31, 2024, 5:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=1227]FaintPanda[/member] that will do but please note
       it's not an appeal, it's a representation. When the council
       inevitably rejects, we'll help with the appeal to the Traffic
       Penalty Tribunal.
       #Post#: 19078--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: FaintPanda
       Date: April 5, 2024, 6:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is it normal to have to post this off, rather than submit it
       online? No where does it say that there is an online option
       available, only post.
       #Post#: 19080--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: April 5, 2024, 8:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Some councils are still in the age of quill pens and wigs, I'm
       afraid.
       On their website, one can challenge a PCN, but it seems only
       paper, pen, and ink, representations are permitted to submit
       formal representations.
       #Post#: 19128--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  PCN - Parking in Loading Bay - Hereford Council
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 5, 2024, 6:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FaintPanda link ---
       >
       > Is it normal to have to post this off, rather than submit it
       online? No where does it say that there is an online option
       available, only post.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       You can make representations here
  HTML https://councilparking.org/herefordshire/Pages/OnlineReferenceEntry.aspx?loadtype=FORMAL
       Keep a screenshot of the confirmation page.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page