DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 14782--------------------------------------------------
Seeking Legal Advice: Is It Worth Defending My Case After
Clamping Appeal Reject
DIR By: Linny1992
Date: February 1, 2024, 2:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello!
I recently had my appeal against a clamping fine rejected, and
now I find myself with the option to take the matter to court.
I'm reaching out to the community for some legal advice to help
me decide whether it's worth defending my case.
Background:
I’m based in England. My car was clamped by TEC due to an unpaid
parking fine issued by TFL in Islington, which I contend was
unfairly enforced. I paid £700 to get it removed.
Despite my efforts to update my driving license with my new
address, I inadvertently overlooked updating my V5c logbook,
resulting in the fine notice being sent to my previous home
address which I had no acknowledgment of.
Current Situation:
After my appeal was rejected, I have the option to take the case
to court. However, it comes with costs – approximately £100 for
a hearing without a judge and £300 for a hearing with a judge.
My Questions:
1. Has anyone faced a similar situation, and if so, what was the
outcome?
2. Is it advisable to proceed to court given the costs involved?
3. Are there any legal experts or individuals with knowledge of
UK traffic law who can shed light on the likelihood of success
in such cases?
I understand that this isn't legal advice, but any insights,
experiences, or guidance you could provide would be greatly
appreciated. I'm trying to make an informed decision about
whether to pursue this further.
Thank you in advance for your assistance!
#Post#: 14794--------------------------------------------------
Re: Seeking Legal Advice: Is It Worth Defending My Case After
Clamping Appeal Reject
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: February 1, 2024, 4:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Linny1992 link ---
>
> I understand that this isn't legal advice
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes it is, that is literally the whole point of this website: to
give legal advice.
I can tell you now that failing to update your V5C is a criminal
offence, forgetting is no defence, and from what you've told us
you'd have little to no chance of getting a good outcome if you
file an application.
In the circumstances, my advice to you is don't throw good money
after bad.
I'm sure this isn't what you wanted to hear, but there's no
point in giving you false hope.
#Post#: 14823--------------------------------------------------
Re: Seeking Legal Advice: Is It Worth Defending My Case After
Clamping Appeal Reject
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: February 1, 2024, 6:34 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
+1
We see lots of cases on here where people have failed to update
their V5 when moving to a new address. The outcome is very
seldom favourable to the OP, because they are in a mess of their
own making, in not updating the V5.
Yes, it is a harsh lesson, but unfortunately there is no easy
get-out, I'm afraid. Just for your information, the only avenue
to revert the matter back to the original PCN is to submit an
Out-of-Time Statutory Declaration to TEC that you didn't receive
the PCN. Problem is that you have to explain why you are
submitting out-of-time, and your reason would not be allowable.
In addition, the council (or TfL) can and will object to your
submission, whereupon it is rejected. You can request a County
Court judge review. This costs about £110 for a papers-based
review, or £255 for an interview with the judge. Neither of
these sums is recoverable, and if the review is refused, you'll
still have the bailiffs to pay..
#Post#: 14844--------------------------------------------------
Re: Seeking Legal Advice: Is It Worth Defending My Case After
Clamping Appeal Reject
DIR By: Neil B
Date: February 2, 2024, 6:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It is important to remember the purpose of an N244 application.
That is, in a pure sense, to review the decision of the court
officer refusing your original application.
Since you haven't shown us that application there is nothing we
can say.
#Post#: 14851--------------------------------------------------
Re: Seeking Legal Advice: Is It Worth Defending My Case After
Clamping Appeal Reject
DIR By: NightSoul
Date: February 2, 2024, 8:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I have a different take on it.
You might be dealing with impropriety with the enforcement
(clamping) rather than the actual traffic contravention.
Have a look through this
HTML https://www.beatthebailiffs.org/stop-parking-ticket-bailifffs.html<br
/> and say which of these applies to you.
I acknowledge not updating a V5 with the DVLA is no excuse, but
it's no excuse for bailiffs to breach enforcement regulations by
clamping without giving statutory notices.
#Post#: 14853--------------------------------------------------
Re: Seeking Legal Advice: Is It Worth Defending My Case After
Clamping Appeal Reject
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: February 2, 2024, 9:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
There are TWO separate but related issues in play here.
1. The underlying contravention and the enforcement process
pursued by the council; and
2. The legally-distinct procedures followed by the bailiffs(to
give them their unofficial title).
The costs of 1 amount to approx. £220 - you should tell us pl.
Therefore the larger component of costs associated with this
issue relates to the bailiffs' charges and any storage fees
after the vehicle was removed, approx. £500.
TEC are ONLY concerned with 1, and don't care about 2.
Your options are either to submit a N244 which, as cp commented,
is very, very unlikely to succeed but, as Neil B pointed out, we
haven't seen your submission so cannot finalise a view, and/or
Look at the bailiffs' procedures. And as you've already paid
there are no associated prescribed time limits.
In short, you're probably asking the wrong question. Yes, you
could pursue 1 & 2, but whereas 2 is FOC, 1 is not.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1