URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 13887--------------------------------------------------
       Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: Goatzie1234
       Date: January 17, 2024, 11:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       just received a PCN from Wise Parking for 'not parking wholly
       within a single marked bay'.
       On that day the driver had an emergency as the driver's partner
       was having medical issues. The driver parked outside of a bay
       temporarily while the driver helped the driver's partner into
       the hospital before returning to the car and parking it in a
       bay. This process took less than 10 minutes and the vehicle was
       not causing an obstruction. The driver was able to pay for
       parking while the driver did this, and for the extra hours the
       driver and the driver's partner then spent in A&E.
       The driver was wondering if there was a grace period for parking
       outside of a bay?
       Also, could the driver claim back what I had paid for parking
       during this period?
       This PCN did not come from ANPR, it must have been an inspector,
       however, no ticket was left on the car. The just took pictures
       and recorded the time by the looks of it.
       Thanks!
       Lee
       #Post#: 13889--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: January 17, 2024, 11:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Are you sure it's not a private parking ticket?
       Please post up all sides of the PCN - at the moment we do't even
       know which of the many Q.E.Hospitals this is.
       #Post#: 13892--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: Goatzie1234
       Date: January 17, 2024, 12:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ah, sorry.
       This is Queen Elizabeth  hospital in South East London.
       From what i understand, the NHS contract Wise Parking to manage
       carparks at some of their hospitals.
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 13896--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: January 17, 2024, 1:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's a Parking Charge Notice (private) rather than a Penalty
       Charge Notice (Council).
       Ive asked a mod to move to
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/
       #Post#: 13897--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: Goatzie1234
       Date: January 17, 2024, 1:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry about that
       #Post#: 13898--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: January 17, 2024, 2:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry to hear about the medical situation - hope your partner
       and baby are well.
       Looking at the contravention, you may be 'bang to rights',
       assuming the signs make clear that vehicles must be wholly
       within marked bays.
       Regarding your specific queries:
       - There is no grace period for parking outside of marked bays.
       There's what is often referred to as a 'consideration period' -
       the minimum time for this is not specifically defined by the
       IPC's Code of Practice (it is in the BPA's: 5 minutes), but it
       essentially means that a motorist must be allowed sufficient
       time to consider the terms of the contract on offer and decide
       whether or not he accepts it, before he can be deemed to be
       bound by the contract and thus liable for charges. The issue
       here will be that you chose not to consider the terms on offer,
       and instead went straight into the hospital (this is entirely
       understandable given the situation of course), and could
       therefore be deemed to have accepted the contract by conduct.
       - You won't be able to claim back the cost of the parking
       already paid for
       A good first step would be to speak to the Patient Advice and
       Liaison Service (PALS) at the hospital in question, explaining
       the situation and asking if they can intervene. Parking
       enforcement in NHS car parks is supposed to deter misuse, not
       penalise patients. Admittedly in this case your parking might
       fall into the category of what might be considered 'misuse', but
       you can try and appeal to PALS' good nature here.
       #Post#: 13900--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: Goatzie1234
       Date: January 17, 2024, 2:31 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you.
       Sadly, yes, the sign does specify parking within bays.
       I will contact PALS.
       I read on another thread that judges tend to throw out cases of
       not parking wholly in bays as they are often deemed de minimis.
       Have you heard this?
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 13903--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: January 17, 2024, 3:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Goatzie1234 link ---
       >
       > I read on another thread that judges tend to throw out cases
       of not parking wholly in bays as they are often deemed de
       minimis. Have you heard this?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Which thread is that?
       The concept of de minimis non curat lex is that the courts are
       not concerned with trifling matters (for example where any
       alleged contravention is so small as to be insignificant). Where
       this is applied to  marked bay scenarios is generally where a
       parking operator has issued a charge because, as an example, one
       tyre is slightly brushing the white line of the bay the driver
       has parked in, with no discernible impact on anybody. I think
       you would struggle to argue that a case where the vehicle is
       entirely outside a bay altogether is de minimis.
       #Post#: 13909--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: Goatzie1234
       Date: January 17, 2024, 4:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Fair enough
       #Post#: 13925--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Queen Elizabeth Hospital PCN
   DIR By: guest46
       Date: January 18, 2024, 2:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'd assume any parking outside marked bays thrown own might be
       where wheels are on dividing bay lines etc? In the image you
       posted the car isn't anywhere near a bay so de Minimus might be
       a reach!!
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page