DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
*****************************************************
#Post#: 131467--------------------------------------------------
MS90 conviction discovered 9 months later - statutory
declaration submitted. What happens next?
DIR By: Psy
Date: September 25, 2026, 3:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
I recently discovered that I had been convicted of failing to
identify a driver (MS90) without knowing anything about the
proceedings. I've submitted a statutory declaration application
and am waiting to hear back, but I'm quite anxious about what
happens next and would appreciate some advice.
The timeline is as follows:
- 6 May 2025: My vehicle was allegedly recorded doing 24 mph in
a 20 mph limit.
- 9 May 2025: Police reportedly sent a NIP and Section 172
request, which I never received.
- 10 June 2025: Date of the alleged failure to identify the
driver offence.
- October 2025: Proceedings were commenced for both speeding and
failing to identify the driver. The court paperwork was sent to
an old address, so I never received it.
- 11 December 2025: I was convicted of the MS90 offence and
received six points and a financial penalty.
- 18 September 2026: I discovered the conviction for the first
time when £1,044 was deducted from my salary through an
attachment of earnings order.
I had moved address before the alleged offences and had updated
my driving licence, but unfortunately hadn't updated my V5C. I
accept that this was my mistake, although I genuinely received
none of the correspondence and had no idea there was a
prosecution or conviction until the money was taken from my
wages.
On 18 September, the same day I found out, I submitted the HMCTS
online application to make a statutory declaration and reopen
the case. I provided tenancy agreements showing when I moved and
have been told to wait for HMCTS to contact me.
What I'm really looking for is advice on what is likely to
happen next.
Assuming the statutory declaration is accepted, will I then have
to attend court again to deal with the original speeding and
Section 172 charges?
Is that normally dealt with at the same hearing or at a later
date?
If I was the driver, would it be sensible to offer to plead
guilty to the original speeding offence in exchange for the
Section 172 charge being withdrawn?
How would I actually go about doing that in court? Would I speak
to the prosecutor beforehand, or explain the situation directly
to the magistrates?
I'm also wondering whether my failure to update the V5C is
likely to cause problems, despite genuinely not receiving any
correspondence.
Is there anything I should be doing now while waiting for HMCTS?
I've never been through anything like this before, so any
practical advice about what to expect at court and how to
approach it would be greatly appreciated.
#Post#: 131468--------------------------------------------------
Re: MS90 conviction discovered 9 months later - statutory
declaration submitted. What happens next?
DIR By: NewJudge
Date: September 25, 2026, 5:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> Assuming the statutory declaration is accepted, will I then
have to attend court again to deal with the original speeding
and Section 172 charges?
--- End Quote ---
You will have to attend court to make your Statutory
Declaration. The court has no option but to accept it (assuming
hey have agreed to hear it).
--- Quote ---
> Is that normally dealt with at the same hearing or at a later
date?
--- End Quote ---
Normally at the same hearing.
--- Quote ---
> If I was the driver, would it be sensible to offer to plead
guilty to the original speeding offence in exchange for the
Section 172 charge being withdrawn?
--- End Quote ---
Yes
--- Quote ---
> How would I actually go about doing that in court? Would I
speak to the prosecutor beforehand, or explain the situation
directly to the magistrates?
--- End Quote ---
If you get the opportunity, speak to the prosecutor. If not,
make your offer when you are called into court.
--- Quote ---
> I'm also wondering whether my failure to update the V5C is
likely to cause problems, despite genuinely not receiving any
correspondence.
--- End Quote ---
No
--- Quote ---
> Is there anything I should be doing now while waiting for
HMCTS?
--- End Quote ---
No
#Post#: 131487--------------------------------------------------
Re: MS90 conviction discovered 9 months later - statutory
declaration submitted. What happens next?
DIR By: NewJudge
Date: September 26, 2026, 7:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It was a bit late last night and I only provided a quick reply.
So a bit of elaboration.
The court must hear your SD if it is made within 21 days of you
discovering that you had been convicted without your knowledge.
They may hear it, at their discretion, beyond that time. In
practice the court would not normally refuse to hear an SD if
the only reason for the delay beyond 21 days was lack of an
appointment slot in the court.
They are only witnessing your declaration. They are not
considering its veracity (though you should be warned that to
make a false declaration is a criminal offence). So once they
have heard it, that is the end of it. Provided it has been made
properly (and the court's Legal Adviser will ensure that it is)
there is no possibiliy that your SD will be declined.
The effect of your declaration will be to remove your conviction
and nullify all the penalties that went with it (fine, costs,
surcharge, endorsement and points).
What will normally happen is that once you have made your
declaration, the charges will be put to you again. If you have
been able to see the prosecutor earlier, he or she will guide
the court through he change in charges. If not, it is at this
point that you can make your offer to plead guilty to speeding
on the condition that the s172 charge is dropped. This is a
common procedure, well known to all court users and officials,
and is almost always accepted.
I note you say “if I was the driver”. This offer can only be
made if you were driving. If you were not, a speeding
prosecution would not succeed (the police have no evidence to
prove who was driving). But you would have to defend the s172
charge (with which you would have considerable difficulty).
Failing to update your V5C is an offence but it is rarely
prosecuted. If it is, it carries only a fine (no endorsement or
points).
Do let us know how it goes.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1