URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 131439--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: BigFishOut455
       Date: September 25, 2026, 8:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you, I did read this but I don’t really understand it all
       if I’m honest. I’m dyslexic and have some neurological issues
       and that is so packed full of stuff it’s hard to read and
       understand it what it means.
       #Post#: 131440--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: ManxTom
       Date: September 25, 2026, 8:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [ Edit: cross-posted with several other posts]
       Why didn't you say in the OP that a lease company was involved?
       Are you 100% certain that you possess the car's V5C document and
       that you (under your correct name and address) are the
       Registered Keeper?
       Is this a Motability car?
       #Post#: 131445--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: andy_foster
       Date: September 25, 2026, 9:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There are 2 separate legal issues - the s. 172 requirement and
       whether or not the apparent failure to serve a NIP on the RK
       within the 14 days is a bar to prosecution for the speeding
       offence.
       There are also 3 logistical issues - how the notice came to be
       sent to the "wrong" address, how the delay affects potential
       disposals, and the fact that we do not discriminate - I am as
       happy to ban able posters for posting rubbish as I am disabled
       posters.
       The s. 172 requirement to name the driver applies from when the
       notice is served by being delivered to the addressee's "last
       known address". It requires the required information to be
       provided within 27 days of the date of service (presumed to be 2
       working days after posting by first class post). There is a
       defence if it was not reasonably practicable to provide the
       information within that time and the information was provided as
       soon as was reasonably practicable afterwards. Whether or not
       you have a defence to the speeding allegation, has no bearing on
       the validity of the s. 172 requirement - you still need to name
       the driver, as soon as is reasonably practicable.
       For practical purposes, it is unusual to be prosecuted for
       naming the driver "late" unless the 6 month limit for
       instigating proceedings for the speeding offence is rapidly
       approaching, but on the face of it you appear to have a
       reasonable "not reasonably practicable" argument.
       A speed awareness course would generally be offered for that
       speed - if the s. 172 response admitting to being the driver is
       processed within 3 months of the date of the speeding offence.
       The police get their information from the PNC which is updated
       from the DVLA overnight - so absent some major snafu, if your
       details were held by the DVLA as RK for that vehicle and that
       VRM the day before the police looked up the keeper details, they
       would have gotten your details. They would only contact a
       previous keeper, or search the insurance database, if no current
       keeper details were shown.
       It is rare for the leasee of a leased car to hold the V5C. What
       is the date after the DocRef. No. at the bottom of page 2 of
       your V5C?
       #Post#: 131453--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: Gilan02
       Date: September 25, 2026, 10:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As the OP gave the dealership his temporary address would this
       have been the address that the car would be registered to?
       Could the leese company have had the V5c updated once the OP was
       in their home address?
       I think the docref date and if it is a motorbility car are the
       important missing items.
       #Post#: 131462--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: BigFishOut455
       Date: September 25, 2026, 1:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes it is a motability car as I’m disabled. I didn’t mention it
       as I didn’t realise it was important. Apologies
       #Post#: 131463--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: BigFishOut455
       Date: September 25, 2026, 1:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The lease company never had any other address for me. I was
       living between both addresses, so I never needed to change my
       home address with anyone. The V5 was registered to my home
       address and is the only address that has ever been on there. The
       name is legally correct too and always has been.
       The car had been registered almost a month by the time the
       alleged speeding offence happened. So even if the police had
       checked the day of the offence or even before it then it would
       have shown my home address. This is why I cannot understand why
       police didn’t check the RK because it would have been sent
       directly to the right address in the right name.
       #Post#: 131464--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 25, 2026, 3:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > This is why I cannot understand why police didn’t check the RK
       because it would have been sent directly to the right address in
       the right name.
       --- End Quote ---
       Ring them up and ask them.
       As Andy says, you are obliged to respond to the request for
       driver’s details. But the driver may have a defence to the
       speeding charge if he or she can show that no Notice of Intended
       Prosecution was served on you within 14 days.
       --- Quote ---
       >
       > Yes it is a motability car as I’m disabled. I didn’t mention
       it as I didn’t realise it was important. Apologies
       --- End Quote ---
       It’s important because we were confused that you were the
       Registered Keeper but the V5C was held by the lease company.
       Motability is the only company that allows this. All the others
       have themselves as the RK.
       #Post#: 131505--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: BigBazz45
       Date: September 26, 2026, 1:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For clarity: When you lease a car through the Motability scheme
       the V5C is issued in your name but sent to Motability.
       So the original S172 request would have gone to Motability and
       they would have given the details that were provided to the
       dealer at the time of signing the agreement. As such, the OP
       will likely have received the second S172 request, so the 14 day
       limit doesn't apply.
       If your contact details change, you can update them on the
       Motability website or by phone.
       #Post#: 131506--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: NewJudge
       Date: September 26, 2026, 2:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > So the original S172 request would have gone to Motability...
       --- End Quote ---
       Why would it?
       #Post#: 132135--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Speeding letter send to wrong address 
   DIR By: sparx
       Date: October 4, 2026, 4:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: NewJudge link ---
       >
       > [quote]So the original S172 request would have gone to
       Motability...
       --- End Quote ---
       Why would it?
       [/quote]
       Appreciate OP has said they have dyslexia so re-written to be
       hopefully easier to read:
       - Check the Doc Ref No field on the inside pages of the V5C.
       There is a date next to it - this should be before the first
       S172 was issued. What is it?
       - Check that the vehicle registration on top of the V5C matches
       your car number plates exactly - Front and Back.  Does it?
       - Check that the VIN (inside pages, Section 4E) matches your
       cars VIN (normally on a small panel at passenger side of the
       windscreen).
       Just wondering if it is possible that OP has been registered
       onto another car, so holding the V5C with a different reg, but
       the dealership has the correct details / reg pairing hence the
       first S172 going to the dealer?
       Doc Ref Date is inside the arrow at the bottom of this image:
  HTML https://www.simplyregistrations.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/V5C-inside-front-cover.jpg
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page