URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 131186--------------------------------------------------
       Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: udyr
       Date: September 22, 2026, 9:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have received a notice of rejection (formal) for a PCN for
       parking at a restricted single line which is restricted for
       10-11am. I returned to my car at 10:02 am. Through FOI and SAR,
       I found out that the observation period for the PCN was betweeen
       10:00:30 to 10:00:34, 4 second interval. The London Councils
       Civil Enforcement Officers Handbook states PCN should not be
       issued within 2 min of parking restriction starting. I have a
       witness statement from my son's teacher who lives close by
       (walking distrance) stating I left her home about 9:58 am to
       return to car to move it.
       The notice states that the no minimum observation period is
       required for contravention and the guidance does not create a
       legal exemption to the restriction and does not invalidate a
       PCN.
       Do I have grounds to take it to the Tribunals ?
       Thanks.
       #Post#: 131190--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: September 22, 2026, 9:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I live very very close to the area. De Minimis may be a ground
       you can use, if the observation time was seconds into the
       restriction, and even 1 minute, then this is a very minor breach
       so a contravention could not have occurred in that sense. De
       Minimis is an importable principle at London Tribunals.
       #Post#: 131191--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: September 22, 2026, 9:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Also please post the original PCN, NTO and all sides of the NoR.
       #Post#: 131198--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: udyr
       Date: September 22, 2026, 10:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Do you have an email I can send attachments to? There seems to a
       few documents pages I have to sent and I am struggling with
       attaching them. Thank you.
       #Post#: 131199--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: September 22, 2026, 11:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can put them in a Google drive folder and send it here,
       setting the view to public. If you can’t do it then feel free to
       PM me and I’ll give the email, as others may also add some
       important advice on.
       #Post#: 131200--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: September 22, 2026, 11:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Also see
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/
       #Post#: 131207--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: September 22, 2026, 11:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       De Minimis Case 1
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uhjMhwpfDWbI7c6hWW9RsoU15JLTXQA5/view?usp=sharing
       This case is from a "No stopping on school entrance markings"
       incident in Barnet. The appellant stopped on these lines 42
       seconds before the restriction ended, and the adjudicator
       imported the principle of De Minimis. In your case the vehicle
       was given a PCN 40 seconds into the restriction then moved 1
       minute later. A motorist cannot be expected to have a clock
       synchronized with the clock of the authority especially by
       seconds.
       #Post#: 131212--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: September 22, 2026, 12:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have just looked at the Civil Enforcement Handbook, yes it
       does say that. Although it isn't binding it will definetly be
       persuasive in showing that Barnet have not complied with their
       own policies and strengthens the De Minimis argument.
       #Post#: 131215--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: September 22, 2026, 12:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As in
       --- Quote ---
       > b) Time restrictions/paid parking
       > Where a time restriction applies, CEOs should not issue a PCN
       less than two minutes before a restriction starts or less than
       two minutes after the restriction has expired. For example, if a
       restriction starts (or paid-for time expires) at 8.00am then a
       PCN should only be issued if the vehicle is in contravention
       after 8.02am. Similarly, if a restriction ends at 6.00pm then no
       PCNs should be issued after 5.58pm. It should be stressed that a
       vehicle in such a situation does not have the right to be in
       place for two minutes – this is not a grace period.
       --- End Quote ---
       from
  HTML https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/assets/Services-Environment/civil-enforcement-officers-handbook.pdf<br
       />I guess?
       #Post#: 131217--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Barnet PCN – Single line restriction – Arlington Road 
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: September 22, 2026, 12:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: jfollows link ---
       >
       > As in
       > [quote]b) Time restrictions/paid parking
       > Where a time restriction applies, CEOs should not issue a PCN
       less than two minutes before a restriction starts or less than
       two minutes after the restriction has expired. For example, if a
       restriction starts (or paid-for time expires) at 8.00am then a
       PCN should only be issued if the vehicle is in contravention
       after 8.02am. Similarly, if a restriction ends at 6.00pm then no
       PCNs should be issued after 5.58pm. It should be stressed that a
       vehicle in such a situation does not have the right to be in
       place for two minutes – this is not a grace period.
       --- End Quote ---
       from
  HTML https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/assets/Services-Environment/civil-enforcement-officers-handbook.pdf<br
       />I guess?
       [/quote]
       Yes, that doucument.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page