URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 130413--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hounslow pcn - Contravention Code 42 parking in designated
       police bay
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: September 14, 2026, 12:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: PBFTLA link ---
       >
       > [quote author=tincombe link=topic=11947.msg130310#msg130310
       date=1789296591]
       > But the burden is on you to convince the adjudicator of these
       facts and that in the round they should ignore the presence of
       the clear broad line and adjacent traffic sign. And whether
       'one', which is you in this case, would be the standard which
       would be applied to motorists in general.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks, I'd mistakenly thought that if they had not adhered to
       the legislation, ie: the 'POLICE' legend on the tarmac and had
       not maintained the lines sufficiently that even with the signage
       on the post I would have a good chance at an appeal but it seems
       that would be a high risk from what you and others are saying so
       may need to just pay up.
       [/quote]
       Unfortunately, adjudicators are very fond of the words
       "substantially compliant". Perfection of line etc is not a
       requirement.  I think maybe you should investigate what t he
       police meant when they said you could park in York Road.
       #Post#: 130443--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hounslow pcn - Contravention Code 42 parking in designated
       police bay
   DIR By: PBFTLA
       Date: September 14, 2026, 6:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > [quote author=PBFTLA link=topic=11947.msg130397#msg130397
       date=1789393600]
       > [quote author=tincombe link=topic=11947.msg130310#msg130310
       date=1789296591]
       > But the burden is on you to convince the adjudicator of these
       facts and that in the round they should ignore the presence of
       the clear broad line and adjacent traffic sign. And whether
       'one', which is you in this case, would be the standard which
       would be applied to motorists in general.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks, I'd mistakenly thought that if they had not adhered to
       the legislation, ie: the 'POLICE' legend on the tarmac and had
       not maintained the lines sufficiently that even with the signage
       on the post I would have a good chance at an appeal but it seems
       that would be a high risk from what you and others are saying so
       may need to just pay up.
       [/quote]
       Unfortunately, adjudicators are very fond of the words
       "substantially compliant". Perfection of line etc is not a
       requirement.  I think maybe you should investigate what t he
       police meant when they said you could park in York Road.
       [/quote]
       That is a shame, and to be frank a disgrace, given the money
       they recoup the least they could be is fully compliant!
       Thought about that but I think that is a non started as they
       said I could park in the road, there are paid bays there as well
       as the resident & Police bays so I think an adjudicator would
       just say they were right, you could park on the road, but they
       did not say you could park anywhere on that road!
       #Post#: 130912--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hounslow pcn - Contravention Code 42 parking in designated
       police bay
   DIR By: PBFTLA
       Date: September 19, 2026, 8:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       All paid begrudgingly as did not think it worth the risk or time
       etc.
       Thanks all for you advice and help.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page