URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 130104--------------------------------------------------
       TfL CCTV PCN Code 46 – Moffat Road SW17 – briefly stopped
       because vehicle was blocking road
   DIR By: h4ss4n4
       Date: September 10, 2026, 11:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TfL – Moffat Road SW17 – Code 46 CCTV PCN – temporarily
       prevented from proceeding
       Hi all,
       I would appreciate some advice on a TfL CCTV PCN before I submit
       representations.
       PCN details
       [*]Authority: Transport for London
       [*]Contravention: Code 46 – Stopped where prohibited (on a red
       route or clearway)
       [*]Location: Moffat Road, south side near its junction with
       Upper Tooting Road, SW17
       [*]Date: 31 August 2026
       [*]Time: 13:56
       PCN:
  HTML https://ibb.co/fVnP3Kq6
       Google Maps location:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/DhX729VLFz6HyHWg6
       What happened
       I remained in the driver's seat throughout.
       Another vehicle was obstructing the road / had left insufficient
       room for me to safely proceed.
       I therefore became temporarily stationary while waiting for
       sufficient space to proceed.
       I was also preparing to reverse slightly in order to give the
       other vehicle more room.
       Once there was sufficient room to proceed safely, I moved away.
       TfL's CCTV evidence
       TfL has only made three still photographs available on the PCN
       website.
       The photographs are timed:
       [*]13:53:15
       [*]13:53:36
       [*]13:56:08
       So the period covered by the still photographs is approximately
       2 minutes 53 seconds.
       The CCTV angle shows my vehicle and the bay, but it does not
       show the relevant section of road ahead of my vehicle where the
       obstruction was.
       In the closer CCTV photograph, the white reversing lamp is
       illuminated.
       I had selected reverse because I was preparing to move backwards
       slightly to create additional room for the other vehicle.
       The driver's window is also open.
       My point is therefore not that the vehicle was never stationary.
       It plainly was.
       My point is that it was temporarily stationary because I was
       unable to proceed safely, rather than being parked or
       voluntarily waiting in the bay.
       The CCTV photographs show my vehicle but, because of the camera
       angle, they do not show the circumstances that caused me to
       stop.
       Current sign
       I have now checked the actual current sign governing the bay.
       It states:
       No stopping Mon-Sat 7am-7pm
       Except 10am-4pm
       Loading max 20 mins
       So I am not disputing the signage.
       The stop occurred at around 13:53–13:56, so this was during the
       period when the bay operates as a loading bay.
       Full CCTV footage
       There is no video available to play on TfL's PCN website.
       TfL only displays the three still photographs referred to above.
       I intend to request access to the complete approved-device
       recording, including footage immediately before, during and
       after the period shown in the still photographs.
       This seems particularly important because the still photographs
       do not show the road ahead of my vehicle.
       Possible exemption – prevented from proceeding
       My understanding is that the applicable Traffic Management Order
       should contain an exemption where a vehicle is:
       "prevented from proceeding by circumstances beyond the driver's
       control"
       I have also found the following adjudication:
       GSL Ltd v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
       PATAS case 2060175326
       My understanding is that the vehicle in that case was prevented
       from moving because of traffic conditions and the adjudicator
       accepted the relevant exemption.
       Obviously another adjudicator's decision would not be binding,
       but it appears potentially relevant to the principle involved
       here.
       Reversing lamp
       One point I would particularly appreciate views on is the
       illuminated reversing lamp.
       The close CCTV photograph appears to show the reversing lamp
       clearly illuminated.
       That is consistent with my recollection that I had selected
       reverse because I was preparing to move backwards slightly to
       give the obstructing vehicle additional room.
       I appreciate that a reversing lamp by itself does not prove why
       I was stationary, but I wondered whether it provides useful
       contemporaneous evidence that the vehicle was being actively
       manoeuvred / remained under the driver's control rather than
       simply being parked.
       Loading
       For completeness, the premises adjacent to the bay are connected
       with my business and I do sometimes deliver stock there.
       I later returned and unloaded stock into the premises.
       However, I do not intend to rely upon loading as the explanation
       for the particular stop shown in these CCTV photographs.
       I want the representation to accurately reflect what happened.
       My case regarding this particular stop is that I was temporarily
       prevented from proceeding because of the other vehicle / traffic
       situation.
       I have not yet submitted representations.
       I would particularly appreciate advice on:
       [*]Is the "prevented from proceeding by circumstances beyond the
       driver's control" exemption the correct ground to rely upon?
       [*]Does the illuminated reversing lamp provide useful evidence
       supporting my account that I was preparing to manoeuvre?
       [*]How significant is the fact that TfL's camera does not show
       the vehicle / obstruction ahead of me?
       [*]Should I obtain the complete CCTV recording before submitting
       my representations, or submit the representation and CCTV
       request together?
       [*]Does anyone have the applicable Traffic Management Order for
       this exact Moffat Road bay and, particularly, the wording of the
       prevented-from-proceeding exemption?
       [*]Is GSL Ltd v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea, case
       2060175326 relevant/useful here?
       [*]Is there anything else in the PCN or TfL evidence that I
       should be looking at?
       I will add links below to the three CCTV images, the close-up
       showing the reversing lamp and the current sign.
       Many thanks.
       #Post#: 130114--------------------------------------------------
       Re: TfL CCTV PCN Code 46 – Moffat Road SW17 – briefly stopped
       because vehicle was blocking road
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: September 10, 2026, 1:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ask TfL for the video.They will send it as a DVD, (yes, they're
       in the IT Dark Ages). They will freeze the process for about 10
       days. If you don't receive it within that period contact them
       again.
       The video should confirm your narrative.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1