URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 129744--------------------------------------------------
       PCN - H&F (52M) - Prohibtion on certan types of motor
       vehicles, Ravencourt Rd, Nthbound Ajd Nos 17
   DIR By: bm_99
       Date: September 6, 2026, 5:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hey all, so the old an got a pcn for basically turning into a
       road from the main A4 which is buses and cyles only.
       Even i am confused as it didnt use to be and after using google
       maps (doing my own research finally) the actual signage showing
       restrictions is literally after the turn and only other thing
       you can do is 3 point turn or reverse onto a main junction.
       Could we just argue that point?
       Let me know thanks
  HTML https://cdn.imgpile.com/f/a7k34su_lg.webp
       #Post#: 129750--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - H&F (52M) - Prohibtion on certan types of motor
       vehicles, Ravencourt Rd, Nthbound Ajd Nos 17
   DIR By: John U.K.
       Date: September 7, 2026, 1:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This location is well-known here, with many thresds. Here is a
       post I made on an earlier thread:
       Have a look at these threads
  HTML http://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/lbhf-pcn-52m-failing-to-comply-with-a-prohibition-on-certain-types-of-vehicle-m-/msg128748/#new
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/rivercourt-road-the-tmo/msg80972/#msg80972
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/hammersmith-and-fulham-code-52m-failing-to-comply-with-a-prohibition-on-certain-/
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/52m-failing-to-comply-with-a-prohibition-on-certain-types-of-vehicle-rmv-riverco/
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/rivercourt-road-pcn-x2/
       The last has links to other threads which are relevant.
       Does he drive the A4 eastbound often?  An important factor is
       the adequacy of the advance warning signs before the turn, and
       whether there have been any changes since last summer..
       There was in May  2025 talk of new signage - here
  HTML https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/a4-and-rivercourt-road-low-traffic-neighbourhood
       Our member, @Bustagate has also produced a useful set of notes -
  HTML https://www.busgates.uk/locations/rivercourt-road
       AFAIK, no case has yet reached London Tribunals, with H&F
       folding, often at the very last moment. It's as if they are
       afraid of an adverse tribunak decision.
       Please post up all sides of the PCN, (redact only yr name &
       address - leave all else in) - you'vr blanked the reg number and
       most importantly, the date of notice.
       Before making any representations, post a draft here for
       constructive comment, but do not miss any deadlines..
       #Post#: 129865--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN - H&F (52M) - Prohibtion on certan types of motor
       vehicles, Ravencourt Rd, Nthbound Ajd Nos 17
   DIR By: bm_99
       Date: September 7, 2026, 6:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, thanks for the info, will make changes to the pcn attached
       and re attached but ive only got until thurs (14 days) to make
       appeal reps, on google maps it shows the same signage fom Aug
       2025, so not sure if they have changed or replaced
       After looking at a few threads, looking to say the following:
       Dear Hammersmith And Fulham Council
       I write to appeal the PCN dated 27th August 2026 (HZ89369473)
       which was issued for 52M – Failing to comply with a prohibition
       on certain types of vehicle (m) motor vehicles.
       I am appealing on the following key points:
       1. Inadequate and Confusing Signage (Regulatory Breach)
       There were no clear advance warning signs on the A4 prior to the
       Rivercourt Road junction, in breach of Regulation 18 of the
       Local Authorities' Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and
       Wales) Regulations 1996. The absence of staged signage (e.g., at
       450, 180, and 20 yards) fails to provide adequate notice.
       Furthermore, upon exiting the A4, drivers are immediately
       confronted with a dense cluster of signs—speed limits, parking
       rules, camera enforcement, and directional indicators—creating
       cognitive overload at a critical decision point. This undermines
       both safety and compliance, particularly for unfamiliar drivers.
       2. Unsafe Road Layout and Lack of Alternatives
       The current layout forces vehicles to stop within 8 metres of
       the junction, despite the Highway Code indicating a braking
       distance of 13.5 metres at 30mph. Larger vehicles may be forced
       to obstruct the A4 to comply. Once committed, given the distance
       of infringement start point is so small, there is no safe or
       legal way to reverse or turn around, making it impossible to
       avoid the restriction without breaching Highway Code Rules 200
       and 201. This design contradicts the Council’s duty under
       Section 122 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to ensure
       safe and efficient traffic flow.
       3. Unreasonable Expectations on Non-Local Drivers
       As an infrequent and non-local user of this route, I was unaware
       of any recent changes. On this occasion, a vehicle ahead
       appeared to be travelling in the wrong direction, adding to the
       confusion. My longstanding understanding of the road as
       one-way—reinforced by prominent "No Entry" signs—further
       contributed to the misinterpretation. The combination of unclear
       signage, road layout, and misleading cues made it unreasonable
       to expect safe and lawful navigation without error.
       Given these substantial legal and safety concerns, I
       respectfully request that this PCN be cancelled. The
       restriction, as currently implemented, is neither lawful nor
       safe.
       I look forward to your confirmation that this charge has been
       withdrawn
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1