URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 128758--------------------------------------------------
       Merton 52J Prohibition on Certain Types Of Vehicle LTN ABBEY
       ROAD JW HIGH PATH
   DIR By: tobesb
       Date: August 25, 2026, 4:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello all.
       Another one like this one:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/merton-52j-prohibition-on-certain-types-of-vehicle-ltn-abbey-road-jw-high-path/msg104502/#msg104502
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/merton-52j-prohibition-on-certain-types-of-vehicle-ltn-abbey-road-jw-high-path/msg104502/#msg104502
       Incidentally, the council initiated the 'except authorised
       vehicles' to stop it being a 'rat run'. We got this letter
       posted through our letterbox about it last year:
  HTML https://www.merton.gov.uk/system/files/newsletter-experimental_order_abbey-pincott_closures.pdf
  HTML https://www.merton.gov.uk/system/files/newsletter-experimental_order_abbey-pincott_closures.pdf
       We live in the vicinity. As we're not passing through the area
       but are trying to return home to the area (within 400 m of the
       location say), we aren't using it as a 'rat run' ie passing
       through the neighbourhood to go further a field. Doubt this
       helps in any way but I thought I'd mention it just in case.
       Here is the PCN:
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/b5yhQSvd/PCN-180826.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/d439jdpK
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/Ldv3Mhr5/PCN-180826-2.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/fdQsbG9v
       I was wondering if the reply suggested for
       HandOverMyCardToCouncil in the first link above would be valid
       for my situation:
       --- Quote ---
       > 1. The PCN does not particularise which vehicles therefore
       does not establish any grounds for the alleged contravention to
       have taken place.
       >
       > 2. Similarly, neither does the video support your allegation.
       >
       > 3. The PCN is missing mandatory information as provided at
       Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of
       >
       >
       > London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003
       > legislation.gov.uk
       >
       >
       > (v)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of
       the 28 day period, an increased charge may be payable.
       >
       >
       > Clearly, this refers to Para. 4 (8 ) (iii):
       >
       > (iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of
       the period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice;
       >
       > Therefore, it follows that the statement: "If you fail to pay
       the Penalty Charge or make representations before the end of a
       period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of this
       notice an increased charge of £240 may be payable” adds to the
       lack of clarity by its omission. Even on its own, whether the
       required information was included or not, it is also arguable
       that it conflates the two periods using the word "or" which many
       would view as being conjunctive. Furthermore, even if the
       statement were to be interpreted disjunctively, there is still
       no clarity due to the missing information. So, it follows that
       it cannot possibly be interpreted disjunctively.
       >
       > In light of the above, please cancel the PCN.
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you for your help in this matter.
       Best wishes,
       Tobes
       #Post#: 128809--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton 52J Prohibition on Certain Types Of Vehicle LTN ABBEY
       ROAD JW HIGH PATH
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 25, 2026, 9:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Strike out 3. Back later and please screenshot their website
       grounds as they  are wrong. I have 3 cases with them at present.
       #Post#: 128891--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Merton 52J Prohibition on Certain Types Of Vehicle LTN ABBEY
       ROAD JW HIGH PATH
   DIR By: tobesb
       Date: August 26, 2026, 2:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Which grounds should I tick please?
       Also, previous page they require a name. Shall I put the real
       name of the registered keeper?
       Best wishes,
       Toby
       -----------------------------
       Representation Grounds*
       What are the reasons (grounds) for your challenge? Select all
       that apply. You can provide more information on the next screen.
       - Any other ground
       - I was not the owner of the vehicle
       - Procedural impropriety
       - The contravention did not occur
       - The order was invalid
       - The PCN has been paid
       - The penalty charge exceeded the amount
       - The vehicle was taken without my consent
       - We are a hire firm
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/vR3RFV6/Screenshot-2026-08-26-at-08-53-42.png
  HTML https://ibb.co/cV6VBkS
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1