DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 128011--------------------------------------------------
PCN issued by APCOA at Heathrow Airport.
DIR By: Sonu rocks
Date: August 17, 2026, 8:28 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
Please see below, any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
HTML https://ibb.co/cK8CskRY
HTML https://ibb.co/5XyPVjgV
#Post#: 128013--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN issued by APCOA at Heathrow Airport.
DIR By: RichardW
Date: August 17, 2026, 8:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Not enforceable against the keeper, search the forum for Airport
and relevant land.
#Post#: 128014--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN issued by APCOA at Heathrow Airport.
DIR By: jfollows
Date: August 17, 2026, 8:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Search the forum for
APCOA Heathrow Airport
and you should find lots of appropriate appeals on the basis of
"not relevant land" and should see that APCOA usually fold when
sent one of these.
#Post#: 128017--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN issued by APCOA at Heathrow Airport.
DIR By: Bulop
Date: August 17, 2026, 8:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Select "other' as a ground for appeal and paste this as the
reasoning:
I am the registered keeper. APCOA cannot hold a registered
keeper liable for any alleged contravention on land that is
under statutory control. As a matter of fact and law, APCOA will
be well aware that they cannot use the PoFA provisions because
Heathrow Airport is not 'relevant land'.
If Heathrow Airport wanted to hold owners or keepers liable
under Airport Byelaws, that would be within the landowner's gift
and another matter entirely. However, not only is that not
pleaded, it is also not legally possible because APCOA is not
the Airport owner and your 'parking charge' is not and never
attempts to be a penalty. It is created for APCOA's own profit
(as opposed to a byelaws penalty that goes to the public purse)
and APCOA has relied on contract law allegations of breach
against the driver only.
The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
APCOA have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a
complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
Best Regards,
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1