URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 127983--------------------------------------------------
       9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Findingaway
       Date: August 17, 2026, 4:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/dpQTx0A
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/DbOzPpx
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/QEx8qeL
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/xbIwOs7
       Hello,
       I am a single-income earner (30K-35K) facing 9 separate 50J
       (Prohibited Right Turn) PCNs from Hillingdon Council at
       Northgate, Northwood, totalling £1,440 at the full rate. I
       challenged all of them individually through the council portal,
       but they have issued formal Notices of Rejection for all nine
       cases. I am preparing to take this to the London Tribunals but
       desperately need your expertise on the viability of a cumulative
       penalty defense, as well as a review of potential procedural
       errors in the council's documentation.
       The Timeline & Context:
       First Alleged Contravention Date: 24/06/2026
       Subsequent Contravention Dates: 8 further infractions between
       25/06/2026 and 06/07/2026.
       Date First PCN Arrived at my home: After 09/07/2026 (over a
       14-day administrative delay from the first camera capture).
       Date of Notices of Rejection:12th August
       The Core Issues:
       Lack of Current Evidence & Signage: The restriction sign was
       heavily obscured by seasonal foliage growing from a private
       property next to the junction. Because the council delayed
       serving the first notice by more than two weeks, I didn't take
       any pictures and when I went to check the branches had been cut
       off.But from the videos/ evidence from the council, you can see
       how much foliage there is.
       For their notice of rejection/sign evidence, the council is
       relying on stock library photographs taken on a completely
       different date, when the trees were clear.
       Procedural Unfairness / Cumulative Penalties: Because Hillingdon
       Council’s automated portal forces motorists to challenge each
       ticket in absolute isolation, I could not present a multi-ticket
       chronological timeline during the initial representation stage.
       Continuous Misunderstanding: I committed a single, continuous
       mistake across these dates precisely because the council failed
       to notify me of the first infraction in a timely manner. Had the
       first notice arrived promptly, I would have immediately ceased
       making the turn.
       My Strategy & Questions for the Forum:
       I am strongly considering paying the £80 discount rate for the
       very first PCN (24 June) to limit financial exposure and prove
       to the adjudicator that I accept the initial warning mechanism
       of the law and that I take responsibility.
       I then plan to appeal PCNs 2 through 9 at the London Tribunals
       on the grounds of procedural failure and cumulative penalty
       precedent, requesting that the adjudicator group them under a
       single lead case.
       Do the council's stock photos from an unverified date legally
       satisfy their burden of proof for the 24 June to 6th of July
       contraventions? Can anyone point me to specific London Tribunals
       key case numbers regarding cumulative/sequential penalties
       resulting from a mailing delay that I can quote to the
       adjudicator?
       I have uploaded the first PCN, the CCTV still, and the Notice of
       Rejection below. Can anyone spot any technical flaws or a
       "failure to consider" in Hillingdon's rejection wording? They
       talk about two signs - The No Right Turn sign before the road
       was obscured by foliage, which meant I did not see the
       restriction. There is also a blue sign immediately before the
       road indicating access for buses and bicycles. I accept that
       this sign was present, but because I had not seen the No Right
       Turn sign, I did not appreciate that I was prohibited from
       turning/ my brain thought it was an informative blue sign hence
       why I accept the mistake.
       #Post#: 128002--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Findingaway
       Date: August 17, 2026, 6:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is there a reason why the post is not getting replies?
       #Post#: 128005--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: August 17, 2026, 7:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Have patience.
       It looks like you are on the right track.
       I don't think an adjudicator will be impressed with videos if
       they are all like this.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/fGpJ6y98/Get-Video12-ezgif-com-video-to-gif-converter.gif
       #Post#: 128007--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Findingaway
       Date: August 17, 2026, 7:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Apologies! I thought my response was not in line with the
       guidelines. Correct - all videos are of the same nature. The
       clearest video the council has is the following.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/18hpaeQ
       
       #Post#: 128033--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: ihateinjustice24
       Date: August 17, 2026, 10:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, I'm messaging to help bump this post. This happened to me.
       Firstly as you've found. the appeal process is entirely
       automated. You should build up as many disputes as you can and
       go with the strongest. for example in my case their appeals
       failed to take into account anything id mentioned at all. thats
       a failure to consider. also look at the offences themselves.
       check the signage is clear and compliant. look into what
       constitutes as complaint as if in anyway they have failed to
       comply you can write all of them off. prepare to prove that this
       amount would cause financial hardship, as if that is actually
       the case and all else fails you may be able to pay over time
       instead of at once.
       additionally note the timings of the appeal letters. in my case
       they sent the notice of rejection letters prematurely which gave
       me grounds to appeal. I'm currently waiting for my hearing and
       was very lucky in that i had a member of this forum help take on
       my case personally for me. i would've never had known to do any
       of this otherwise.
       #Post#: 128034--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: August 17, 2026, 10:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Findingaway link ---
       >
       >
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/dpQTx0A
       >
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/DbOzPpx
       >
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/QEx8qeL
       >
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/xbIwOs7
       >
       > Hello,
       > I am a single-income earner (30K-35K) facing 9 separate 50J
       (Prohibited Right Turn) PCNs from Hillingdon Council at
       Northgate, Northwood, totalling £1,440 at the full rate. I
       challenged all of them individually through the council portal,
       but they have issued formal Notices of Rejection for all nine
       cases. I am preparing to take this to the London Tribunals but
       desperately need your expertise on the viability of a cumulative
       penalty defense, as well as a review of potential procedural
       errors in the council's documentation.
       >
       > The Timeline & Context:
       > First Alleged Contravention Date: 24/06/2026
       > Subsequent Contravention Dates: 8 further infractions between
       25/06/2026 and 06/07/2026.
       > Date First PCN Arrived at my home: After 09/07/2026 (over a
       14-day administrative delay from the first camera capture).
       > Date of Notices of Rejection:12th August
       >
       > The Core Issues:
       >
       > Lack of Current Evidence & Signage: The restriction sign was
       heavily obscured by seasonal foliage growing from a private
       property next to the junction. Because the council delayed
       serving the first notice by more than two weeks, I didn't take
       any pictures and when I went to check the branches had been cut
       off.But from the videos/ evidence from the council, you can see
       how much foliage there is.
       >
       > For their notice of rejection/sign evidence, the council is
       relying on stock library photographs taken on a completely
       different date, when the trees were clear.
       >
       > Procedural Unfairness / Cumulative Penalties: Because
       Hillingdon Council’s automated portal forces motorists to
       challenge each ticket in absolute isolation, I could not present
       a multi-ticket chronological timeline during the initial
       representation stage.
       >
       > Continuous Misunderstanding: I committed a single, continuous
       mistake across these dates precisely because the council failed
       to notify me of the first infraction in a timely manner. Had the
       first notice arrived promptly, I would have immediately ceased
       making the turn.
       >
       > My Strategy & Questions for the Forum:
       >
       > I am strongly considering paying the £80 discount rate for the
       very first PCN (24 June) to limit financial exposure and prove
       to the adjudicator that I accept the initial warning mechanism
       of the law and that I take responsibility.
       >
       > I then plan to appeal PCNs 2 through 9 at the London Tribunals
       on the grounds of procedural failure and cumulative penalty
       precedent, requesting that the adjudicator group them under a
       single lead case.
       >
       > Do the council's stock photos from an unverified date legally
       satisfy their burden of proof for the 24 June to 6th of July
       contraventions? Can anyone point me to specific London Tribunals
       key case numbers regarding cumulative/sequential penalties
       resulting from a mailing delay that I can quote to the
       adjudicator?
       >
       > I have uploaded the first PCN, the CCTV still, and the Notice
       of Rejection below. Can anyone spot any technical flaws or a
       "failure to consider" in Hillingdon's rejection wording? They
       talk about two signs - The No Right Turn sign before the road
       was obscured by foliage, which meant I did not see the
       restriction. There is also a blue sign immediately before the
       road indicating access for buses and bicycles. I accept that
       this sign was present, but because I had not seen the No Right
       Turn sign, I did not appreciate that I was prohibited from
       turning/ my brain thought it was an informative blue sign hence
       why I accept the mistake.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Can you also send the back of the PCN letters, they are required
       to state the grounds of appeal, if they are wrong this can be
       enough to cancel the PCN due to a procedural impropriety. I have
       seen Hillingdon fail to list the grounds correctly for bus lane
       cases.
       #Post#: 128040--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Findingaway
       Date: August 17, 2026, 10:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Can you also send the back of the PCN letters, they are
       required to state the grounds of appeal, if they are wrong this
       can be enough to cancel the PCN due to a procedural impropriety.
       I have seen Hillingdon fail to list the grounds correctly for
       bus lane cases.
       --- End Quote ---
       Hello - all PCNs at the back have only the section "how to pay"
       and "making representation". There are no further details on the
       PCN besides what I shared and they are all identical in their
       wording.
       #Post#: 128042--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Bulop
       Date: August 17, 2026, 10:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Send the back side of one of them please.
       #Post#: 128044--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Findingaway
       Date: August 17, 2026, 10:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Bulop link ---
       >
       > Send the back side of one of them please.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/0Tm23X4
       All of them have the same front and back.
       #Post#: 128045--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 9x 50J Cumulative PCNs - Northgate, Northwood - Hillingdon
       Council
   DIR By: Findingaway
       Date: August 17, 2026, 10:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ihateinjustice24 link ---
       >
       > Hi, I'm messaging to help bump this post. This happened to me.
       Firstly as you've found. the appeal process is entirely
       automated. You should build up as many disputes as you can and
       go with the strongest. for example in my case their appeals
       failed to take into account anything id mentioned at all. thats
       a failure to consider. also look at the offences themselves.
       check the signage is clear and compliant. look into what
       constitutes as complaint as if in anyway they have failed to
       comply you can write all of them off. prepare to prove that this
       amount would cause financial hardship, as if that is actually
       the case and all else fails you may be able to pay over time
       instead of at once.
       > additionally note the timings of the appeal letters. in my
       case they sent the notice of rejection letters prematurely which
       gave me grounds to appeal. I'm currently waiting for my hearing
       and was very lucky in that i had a member of this forum help
       take on my case personally for me. i would've never had known to
       do any of this otherwise.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks!What I find odd is that they completely ignored my point
       about the foliage covering the “No Right Turn” sign.
       As a driver coming up to the road, I’m obviously going to be
       looking out for oncoming traffic, pedestrians, cyclists etc. I’m
       not going to be scanning around for another sign further ahead
       if I can’t see a “No Right Turn” sign on approach.
       I just find it strange that they’ve basically dismissed that
       point given the evidence that they have provided, because surely
       the visibility of the sign is pretty important here. If the sign
       is hidden by foliage, how is a driver reasonably supposed to
       know they need to look for another sign before entering? This is
       dangerous, as you would have already committed to the turn.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page