URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 127853--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: ManxTom
       Date: August 15, 2026, 8:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Roc98 link ---
       >
       >
       > I was recorded at 85 in the 50mph.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       --- Quote from: Roc98 link ---
       >
       >
       >
       > The police recorded that speed so I accept that but I slowed
       down when it went from 70mph to 50mph.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Aren't you contradicting yourself?
       On the one hand you say you were recorded at 85 in a 50 and you
       accept that, but then you say you slowed down when you entered
       the 50.
       So were you doing 85 in the 50?
       #Post#: 127856--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Roc98
       Date: August 15, 2026, 9:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ManxTom link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Roc98 link=topic=11732.msg127825#msg127825
       date=1786746723]
       >
       > I was recorded at 85 in the 50mph.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       --- Quote from: Roc98 link ---
       >
       >
       >
       > The police recorded that speed so I accept that but I slowed
       down when it went from 70mph to 50mph.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Aren't you contradicting yourself?
       On the one hand you say you were recorded at 85 in a 50 and you
       accept that, but then you say you slowed down when you entered
       the 50.
       So were you doing 85 in the 50?
       [/quote]
       The truth of it is, I don't recall as it was 3 months ago but i
       drive down that road often and there is a speed camera as the
       road goes from 70 to 50mph - i always slow down at this point
       for the camera, so it's unlikely i'd be doing 85 at that point
       but this is what the record shows.
       #Post#: 127857--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Roc98
       Date: August 15, 2026, 9:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: NewJudge link ---
       >
       > The long and the short of it is this:
       >
       > If you enter a guilty plea, but disagree with the facts of the
       allegation, you can enter your plea “on a basis”. In your case
       this would be “I was not doing (for example) 85mph but 75mph”.
       >
       > The court must decide whether there would be a material
       difference in their sentence if they accept your version rather
       than the version put forward by the police.
       >
       > If they believe it will not, they must proceed to sentence you
       based on your version.
       >
       > If they believe it will, they must either accept your version
       or order a hearing (known as a “Newton Hearing”) to establish
       which version they will use for sentencing. The hearing is
       rather like a trial, but instead of it determining your guilt or
       innocence, it determines the facts.
       >
       > You have not made it very clear what the speed within the
       50mph limit you say you were doing. You said “roughly 80mph”.
       But it seems you do not dispute doing 80-85mph when you entered
       the 50mph stretch.
       >
       > So I don’t really know what you are arguing about as far as
       the speed goes. The charge sheet says 85mph and you accept it
       was 80-85mph. I would suggest that whether the court accepts
       85mph as alleged or your lower estimate of 80mph, it will make
       no material difference to sentencing.
       >
       > So to answer your questions:
       >
       > 1.It may be worth contacting the police prosecutor to ensure
       that their statement alleging 85 mph is what will be used in
       court.
       >
       > 2.The guidelines for 85 in a 50 limit suggest either a ban of
       up to 56 days or six points. Strictly speaking you have no right
       to argue that a ban will cause you “exceptional hardship” (that
       is only available for “totting up” bans). But the court will
       consider your circumstances when making their decision.
       >
       > 3.If you are confident enough to speak in court, you should be
       able to handle this yourself. I don’t believe the speed
       discrepancy will be an issue. However, 85 in a 50 limit is in
       the range where the court will consider a ban appropriate, so
       you should be prepared for that.
       >
       > Unless you ask for a court appearance, your case will
       initially be heard by a “Single Justice” (SJ) at a hearing which
       you cannot attend. However, if the SJ believes a ban should be
       considered, your case will be adjourned to a hearing which you
       can attend.
       >
       > In view of your concerns over both the speed and the possible
       disqualification I would suggest you ask for a personal hearing
       anyway. You can then be sure that all the points about which you
       are concerned are considered. If a Newton Hearing is ordered, it
       will not take place on eh same day as your first hearing, but at
       a later date.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you, this is incredibly helpful, I will ask for a court
       hearing. The officer at the time said the offence wouldn't
       affect my DBS records, do you know if this will show on a
       enhanced DBS check as i hear conflicting responses as to whether
       it will.
       #Post#: 127859--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Roc98
       Date: August 15, 2026, 9:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: NewJudge link ---
       >
       > And do you accept that you were doing that speed?
       >
       > If not, what speed do you accept you were doing?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It's really hard to say as it was 3 months ago - I accept in the
       70mph I was doing upwards of 85 but I always slow down as it
       drops to 50mph as there is a speed camera (I know the road
       well), so where the police report says 'i followed the vehicle
       maintaining a steady even distance of approx 50 meters for 2
       miles along the A1' it doesn't specify that majority of that
       road is 70mph. And it doesn't mention me slowing down. The
       police officer suspected i either slowed down for the camera or
       because I spotted them, but this isn't detailed in the report.
       I'm not sure if that makes a difference.
       #Post#: 127861--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Korting
       Date: August 15, 2026, 10:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I know that road quite well, the 50mph limit southbound comes
       into effect at the end of the A1M at South Mimms.  it was 70Mph
       but was reduced several months ago to 50 presumably to stop
       accidents occurring from people exiting Trotters Bottom/Galley
       Lane.  From the junction at the at Rowley Lane, Borehamwood it
       has been 50Mph for some years.
       To be honest unless you could prove that you were doing under
       76MPH (which is the upper limit before it goes to a SJPN)
       whether you were doing 80, 85 or 90 would make no difference.
       To prove that, you'd haveto prove that the equipment used to
       record your speed was approx 20% out and I doubt if any court
       would believe that.
       If it was me, I'd probably attend court, say you are sorry for
       committing the offene and accept the punishment.  Others of
       course may feel differently.
       #Post#: 127862--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Ratus Ratus
       Date: August 15, 2026, 10:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It 'drops' to 50 just as you come under the M25 now & has done
       for about 12 months now - so all the way down to the fixed
       cameras near Sterling corner . So maybe you dont really know the
       road that well....
       #Post#: 127864--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Southpaw82
       Date: August 15, 2026, 10:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A speeding offence is not a recordable offence. Therefore it is
       not automatically included on a DBS check. Whether it would
       appear on an enhanced certificate depends on whether the police
       consider it to be relevant - which seems highly unlikely.
       #Post#: 127866--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Ratus Ratus
       Date: August 15, 2026, 10:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This newer section of 50 is part of the National Highways SRN -
       so might be worth checking they have a correct speed limit order
       - it wont be one made by Barnet or Borehamwood councils. I think
       the section where the fixed cameras are is just within the
       London Borough of Barnet so TFL should have the order for that.
  HTML https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/976/cpsprodpb/71f7/live/127d8050-9955-11f0-af62-91486a511a31.jpg.webp
       #Post#: 127899--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 85/90mph in a 50 zone (A1, NW London), inconsistent speed
       readings, 3 month gap, disability mitigation
   DIR By: Roc98
       Date: August 16, 2026, 4:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Southpaw82 link ---
       >
       > A speeding offence is not a recordable offence. Therefore it
       is not automatically included on a DBS check. Whether it would
       appear on an enhanced certificate depends on whether the police
       consider it to be relevant - which seems highly unlikely.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks very much, this is the most helpful response, it's put me
       at ease slightly.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page