URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 126608--------------------------------------------------
       GroupNexus - Moto Winchester South - Overstay
   DIR By: X-treem
       Date: August 2, 2026, 3:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I received an NtK
  HTML http://repository.x-treem.net/Misc%20Pictures/FTLA/PCN%2014.07.26%20-%20NtK.pdf<br
       />from Europcar (which they received from GroupNexus), then an
       NtH
  HTML http://repository.x-treem.net/Misc%20Pictures/FTLA/PCN%2014.07.26%20-%20NtH.pdf<br
       />from GroupNexus.
       Based on similar recent topics involving GroupNexus (Purley Way
       Retail Park
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/groupnexus-ntk-overstay-purley-way-retail-park/,<br
       />Moto Wetherby
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/groupnexus-moto-wetherby-paid-for-hgv-overnight-parking-none-provided-in-the-cor/,<br
       />Northampton Central Gym Group
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/groupnexus-pcn-car-regn-num-not-entered-the-gym-group-northampton-central/),<br
       />I've created this initial appeal:
       --- Quote ---
       > I appeal as the addressee of your Notice to Hirer dated 23
       July 2026. I make no admission as to the identity of the driver.
       >
       > The Notice to Hirer was not accompanied by the documents
       required under paragraphs 13(2) and 14(2)(a) of Schedule 4 to
       the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012: the vehicle-hire
       firm&#8217;s statement, the hire agreement, the hirer&#8217;s
       signed statement of liability and the Notice to Keeper.
       >
       > You have therefore failed to satisfy the statutory conditions
       required to transfer liability to a hirer. Any liability
       allegedly incurred by the unidentified driver has not been
       transferred to me and cannot be recovered from me under Schedule
       4. Please cancel the parking charge.
       >
       > My current and only address for correspondence and service is:
       >
       > [REDACTED]
       > Portland, OR 97229
       > United States
       >
       > The former UK address is no longer valid for correspondence or
       service. This notice happened to be forwarded to me, but future
       correspondence may not be. Please update your records and use
       only the address above.
       --- End Quote ---
       I've deliberately omitted a point of appeal under 14(5)(e) as I
       can see that this was rejected by POPLA in the aforementioned
       topics. I don't want to give GroupNexus an easy path to rebuttal
       given the more decisive appeal point under 13(2) and 14(2)(a). I
       can always add it later in an appeal to POPLA or court.
       Thoughts?
       #Post#: 126640--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus - Moto Winchester South - Overstay
   DIR By: InterCity125
       Date: August 3, 2026, 1:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, sounds like a good plan.
       If you post up the NtH we can offer further advice / appeal
       points.
       GroupNexus NtKs / NtHs are normally non-compliant in terms of
       POFA.
       #Post#: 126653--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus - Moto Winchester South - Overstay
   DIR By: X-treem
       Date: August 3, 2026, 3:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       They're at the links in my OP. &#9786;&#65039;
       #Post#: 126673--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus - Moto Winchester South - Overstay
   DIR By: InterCity125
       Date: August 3, 2026, 6:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry - must have missed the link of first read!
       So I would make the initial appeal to GroupNexus / CP Plus Ltd
       on the basis of what you have said, namely; that the other
       documents were not served with the NtH.
       In my opinion the NtH has a number of other failing;
       1. The NtH fails to reference the original NtK as required by
       14(5)(b)
       2. The NtH fails to identify the creditor as required by
       14(5)(e) - CP Plus and GroupNexus are now separate legal
       entities with different company numbers etc so it is unclear who
       the creditor is.
       #Post#: 129341--------------------------------------------------
       Re: GroupNexus - Moto Winchester South - Overstay
   DIR By: X-treem
       Date: September 2, 2026, 12:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Appeal accepted. Received this email on 24 Aug:
       --- Quote ---
       > Dear Sir/Madam,
       > Thank you for your correspondence relating to your Parking
       Charge: 00419261920006.
       > Further to your representations, we have investigated your
       claims and can confirm that your Charge has subsequently been
       cancelled in full and no further action will be taken.
       > Please disregard any letters received that predate this email.
       > Yours faithfully,
       > CP Plus Limited
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks, InterCity125 for your assistance. The only change I made
       to my appeal in my OP based on your advice (and the help of
       ChatGPT) was to add this:
       --- Quote ---
       > In addition, the Notice to Hirer does not refer me to the
       information contained in the Notice to Keeper, as separately
       required by paragraph 14(5)(b).
       --- End Quote ---
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1