DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 126340--------------------------------------------------
Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: McThrowaway
Date: July 30, 2026, 4:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello, <- :D (idiot, me)
Didn't notice the sign as my GPS directed me past this...
Regardless, this is pretty much my fault; not purposefully, but
my fault regardless. I have only been driving for less than half
a year (passed test 2 years prior to that), and since I don't
drive too regularly w/ passengers (as I did on the day), I
suppose a mistake like this was bound to happen.
Embedded* whatever is relevant below (hopefully correctly the
first time round nope):
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/76SjwJH2/PCN.jpg
Video (linked here, if it hasn't expired already)
HTML https://convertandedit.com/share/direct/721d15a4-01e4-4405-8f93-e79ec37901d1.mp4
HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/T2WiePCJSNw5EnzG9
I am curious, since this post exists: I'm suspecting I
realistically have nothing to stand on, but would there be any
"excuse" (i.e. first PCN, relatively "new" driver, etc.) that
would let the council slide, or will I have to suck it up and
"mug-up" to the council?
Thank you for any response.
* = Set to expire after a year (maximum; some will expire
earlier)
#Post#: 126342--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: July 30, 2026, 4:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Please show all of the PCN only less personal details and I will
deal with this for you personally.
#Post#: 126345--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: McThrowaway
Date: July 30, 2026, 4:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> Please show all of the PCN only less personal details and I
will deal with this for you personally.
>
--- End Quote ---
All of the 4 pages, yeah?
#Post#: 126354--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: McThrowaway
Date: July 30, 2026, 5:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ok, I (finally) added all the stuff I believe is necessary at
the moment.
I will add more if necessary (or also once I get a response from
the above).
#Post#: 126357--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: July 30, 2026, 6:01 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Do not do anything at present.
#Post#: 126376--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: McThrowaway
Date: July 31, 2026, 5:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> Do not do anything at present.
>
--- End Quote ---
Sure. Is there a plan to this or...?
#Post#: 126404--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: July 31, 2026, 9:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This which they will reject:
You cannot serve a charge certificate or increase the price to
£240 as stated on the PCN. Therefore, please consider this
collateral challenge and cancel the said PCN.
Choose ground: the penalty exceeded the amount..........
No more, no less and verbatim as I have written.
When they respond, I will take care of this case for you.
#Post#: 126430--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: McThrowaway
Date: July 31, 2026, 2:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> This which they will reject:
>
> You cannot serve a charge certificate or increase the price to
£240 as stated on the PCN. Therefore, please consider this
collateral challenge and cancel the said PCN.
>
> Choose ground: the penalty exceeded the amount..........
>
> No more, no less and verbatim as I have written.
>
> When they respond, I will take care of this case for you.
>
--- End Quote ---
So I'm guessing through the link:
HTML https://pcnevidence.southwarkparking.co.uk/pcnonline/index.php
I write that in the box through: Representation -> The PCN
exceeded the amount applicable -> This is a lower band
contravention not a higher band contravention
If not, please let me know.
---------------------------------------------------------
Also, sorry for my dumbassery and/or naïvety, but is there a
reason I should do this?
I was just wondering originally if I have any actual excuse and
right now, I'm not exactly sure what the plan is (would help if
I knew what was going on, lol... or (I hope) you can ask me via
DM if it helps?
#Post#: 126495--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: August 1, 2026, 10:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
We choose that ground as it is in lieu of procedural impropriety
having followed several learned adjudicators' decision in this
aspect.
PM me a phone number please as typing is tedious and
time-consuming when you help 20+ people a day and file 3 or 4
appeals a day.
#Post#: 126729--------------------------------------------------
Re: Southwark - Code 52m // Failing to comply w/ prohibition on
certain vehicles - Larcom Street
DIR By: McThrowaway
Date: August 3, 2026, 1:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
For everyone else curious, I have sent what I have been told by
Hippocrates.
If anyone wants an update out of curiosity, please let me know
here or DM, unless advised otherwise.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 2
DIR Next Page