URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 125942--------------------------------------------------
        Enforcement of traffic penalties by London Councils, training
       of staff, changes in the law, training of adjudicators.
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 27, 2026, 4:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I respectfully suggest that we all write to our MPs in similar
       terms to cut off all the heads of the Hydra.
       All we are doing at present is sticking pins into the
       underbelly.
       I attached various cases as examples and one screenshot of the
       Havering website.
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bB_hlGKDk9JlNIGrVyQLR7kY-n4Bm8lo/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vKLwunE12o3eOLQMKxOQCftWDtXZf1zf/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y9EBm4X5JM23Y9YFPl97Cu2Lc6qs0lZg/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ff7PMwPtWQqNhUlTQQ3LbP1kzHMvAKu_/view
       Case reference 2250437817. Lost: told to go to the High Court.
       Havering web site wrong grounds re 2003 Act:
  HTML https://cdn.imgpile.com/f/EoJpWU6_xl.png
       ******
       Dear Sir or Madam
       As a "very experienced representative" (according to several
       London Tribunals adjudicators), my heart bleeds when I observe
       hearings in which I am not allowed to speak and I witness
       appellants losing cases when they are not fully aware of my (and
       others') toolkit to win an appeal. This includes failure to
       consider, misinformation on council's websites, non-compliant
       documents and the premature issue of charge certificates.
       I am also deeply concerned about the level of knowledge of those
       employed  by many councils, their training and, indeed, the
       training of new adjudicators and their appointment.
       Furthermore, I am concerned about the high threshold to be met
       when applying for costs: I believe that this should be relaxed
       and to include situations where councils issue a DO NOT CONTEST.
       Finally, there should be a change in law concerning costs and
       review applications. Following the recent ruling as mentioned in
       my recent review case re Hubba Karim v Kingston, if an
       adjudicator is "wrong in law", one must automatically go to  the
       High Court.* This is grossly unjust since there already exists
       an Upper Tribunal which could hear cases IF the legislation were
       changed.
       I politely request an urgent meeting to discuss these issues
       with the possibility of my having an appointment to meet with
       the Secretary of  State for Transport and/or any other members
       of the relevant committee.  It cannot be right that I am placed
       into the allegorical position of David v Goliath when this
       global abuse of power is rife and people are bluntly being
       ripped off and taken for a ride.
       I am deeply concerned by all this.
       Yours sincerely
       007
       *
  HTML https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2023/2889.pdf
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1