URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 124984--------------------------------------------------
       Council Video subsequently edited 
   DIR By: Rosa52
       Date: July 17, 2026, 5:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I hope someone can clarify what I could do under the following
       circumstances:
       PCN received for alleged moving traffic contravention (yellow
       box junction), and Representations were made in a timely manner.
       After 103 days, Council's rejection received, but they have not
       responded to an important aspect where the video showed a
       vehicle from a side road that did not abide by Highway code Rule
       172, nor obey the 'right of way' rule, and caused my vehicle to
       get stuck in the box.
       Council has not only ignored that issue, but it has now altered
       the original video which showed that vehicle's errant action
       that caused alleged infringement in the first instance, by
       reducing that which it showed initially.
       I'm at stage of applying to London Tribunal, but the main issue
       that I appealed on has been edited out by the Council, &
       Adjudicators will not be able to see the original video which
       told the whole story.
       How can I request the original copy, please?
       Would much appreciate any advice from you on this very helpful
       site.
       Thank you
       #Post#: 124996--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Video subsequently edited 
   DIR By: MrChips
       Date: July 17, 2026, 6:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The video has to show the moment you enter they box. If they've
       edited it such that it starts after another vehicle manoeuvre
       which happened after you entered, that should strengthen your
       hand.
       Hard to comment in detail though as we haven't had sight of the
       documents or video yet.
       Also, 103 days is likely to be considered unfair. If you help us
       to help you by providing the detail we need we can probably find
       other things you can win on over and above an argument about
       video editing.
       #Post#: 125005--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Video subsequently edited 
   DIR By: Rosa52
       Date: July 17, 2026, 8:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you, Mr Chips, for your quick response.
       The original video did show my vehicle entering the hatched
       space, as well as the vehicle that came out of side road without
       waiting at the white lines, but now after it was edited, only
       shows the last bit, which is being used to back the Council's
       refusal.
       This type of action diminishes any faith a motorist could have
       in such organisations for justice and fairness.
       I need assistance from a younger person to correctly post up the
       paperwork for your perusal - which I will attempt this weekend.
       Rejection of Representations dated 26/06/26 was received on
       30/06, so I believe deadline for applying to Tribunal is coming
       up fast (not sure if 28 days from 26/06 is start of clock or
       date of receipt).
       Thank you very much for your interest and assistance.
       #Post#: 125008--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Video subsequently edited 
   DIR By: tincombe
       Date: July 17, 2026, 8:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       IMO, register your appeal now because this starts the process
       clock e.g. council know you're serious, they have to deliver
       specified docs to the tribunal etc.
       You do not need to write War and Peace, you seem to be relying
       on your reps and a prospective and fundamental failure to
       provide to the adjudicator a proper copy of the primary evidence
       upon which they're relying.
       #Post#: 125043--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Video subsequently edited 
   DIR By: RichardW
       Date: July 17, 2026, 3:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you post up the council, car reg number and PCN number
       there's a good chance we can look at it online.
       #Post#: 125054--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Video subsequently edited 
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 17, 2026, 5:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1