URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18912--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 3, 2024, 6:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Jajajajajajajajajajajajaja!
       #Post#: 19086--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 5, 2024, 9:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=1]cp8759[/member]:  They have asked for a review.  ::)
       #Post#: 19101--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: concoj
       Date: April 5, 2024, 12:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What’s going on? Are they cukcuk?
       #Post#: 19118--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 5, 2024, 4:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Los documentos estan para los servicios! Crackers! I have tried
       to phone  you but no answer. Do not worry.
       #Post#: 19136--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 6, 2024, 5:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: concoj link ---
       >
       > What’s going on? Are they cukcuk?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Si, siempre estan y son.
       #Post#: 19248--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 7, 2024, 4:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FYI courtesy of cp8759:
       Case Reference: 2230422726
       DANIEL BRAZIL
       -v-
       London Borough of Brent
       (the Enforcement Authority)
       Vehicle Registration Number: WO06 LME
       Penalty Charge Notice(s): BT19307832
       The Authority seeks a further review.
       The issue at the review was whether an Appellant serving a
       Notice under Paragraph 7(3) of the
       London Local Authorities Act 1996 (as amended) can only do so by
       lodging the Notice via the
       Tribunals’ portal.
       One would expect the Authority to check the legislation before
       applying for a review. It would appear that it has not done so
       because it has not at any stage offered any submissions as to
       why the legislation requires it. Despite me pointing this out in
       the review decision, the Authority seeks a further review. Its
       reason is that it had not attended the hearing because it had
       not been asked to attend.
       When parties receive notification that there will be a personal
       hearing, they decide whether to appear.
       The Tribunal will not offer specific invitations.
       I have already commented in my decision that the application was
       ill-conceived because the Authority has not identified any error
       on the adjudicator’s part. The application had not been
       dismissed summarily without a hearing simply because the
       Authority suggested that it would attend. I have therefore set
       the application down for a personal hearing, but the Authority’s
       case is that this is not good enough because it needed to be
       asked to attend. The second application is also baseless as a
       matter of law.
       The application is refused.
       I am asking the head of enforcement of the authority to confirm
       that its officers are adequately trained to conduct proceedings
       before this Tribunal.
       Anthony Chan
       Chief Adjudicator Environment and Traffic
       #Post#: 19249--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: concoj
       Date: April 7, 2024, 4:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “I am asking the head of enforcement of the authority to confirm
       that its officers are adequately trained to conduct proceedings
       before this Tribunal.“
       Anthony Chan
       Chief Adjudicator Environment and Traffic
       😜 🤣
       #Post#: 19269--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 8, 2024, 4:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I wager that, when the submissions are read, something entirely
       similar may well be rehearsed.
  HTML https://emoji.tapatalk-cdn.com/emoji56.png
       Hopefully, as their
       application cannot possibly satisfy any of the criteria for a
       review of the original decision. The adjudicator was entirely
       correct in everything he said - and so was the representative -
       re the inadmissibility of evidence. They did not even submit a
       Witness Statement. Enough for the time being.
       #Post#: 19420--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: concoj
       Date: April 9, 2024, 7:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       🤣😜🤭😂😝🏆💪🏼🥳🥳🥳🥇
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 19434--------------------------------------------------
       Re: MICHELL WAY (Bus Lane) BROMLEY Code34J
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: April 10, 2024, 5:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, that says it all.  I think a costs application is in order
       since, this application not only demonstrates their total
       incompetence but also - and more importantly - the allegations
       that the representative had not followed due process and muddied
       the waters are wholly unreasonable.  ;)
       *****************************************************
       Page 4 of 5
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page