URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 125174--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Smart Parking NTK appeal rejected despite no POFA keeper
       liability.
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: July 20, 2026, 8:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just rebut everything they state with which you disagree.
       eg how could the operator have received an appeal on 29/06/2026
       as claimed, and that it was from the registered keeper, the
       driver has not been identified. They claim they received the
       appeal on the day they sent the NtK, unless you mis-transcribed
       this.
       Then point out their own dates in their rebuttal doom them from
       using PoFA 2012. And rebut the Elliot v Loake presumption again
       if necessary.
       Don’t boil the ocean because they’re not going to uphold your
       appeal and you are in the process of an eventual court claim
       with a likely discontinuation if defended. Loads of similar
       examples of Smart & DCB Legal here.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page