URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 123891--------------------------------------------------
       Hammersmith & Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: jumpingskyfox
       Date: July 6, 2026, 9:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       I'd really appreciate some help with a Moving Traffic PCN I
       received from the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham.
       PCN: HZ99622866
       VRM: LJ68HDX
       Contravention: Code 52M – Failing to comply with a prohibition
       on certain types of vehicle (motor vehicles)
       Location: RMV Sawley Rd Westbnd nr Jct Bloemfontein Rd
       Date of Alleged Contravention: 20/06/2026
       Time: 21:34
       Date of Notice: 30/06/2026
       Camera Operator: VA143
       I genuinely didn't spot/notice the restriction sign when turning
       right from Bloemfontein Rd onto Sawley Rd.
       I was wondering if I could argue for obscured signage for the
       following reasons:
       1) Roadworks: Right next to/underneath the restriction sign
       pole, there was a temporary green roadworks barrier and a
       triangular roadworks sign. This completely cluttered the view
       and distracted from the regulatory signage.
       2) Major emergency incident: This occurred at 21:34, right as
       there was unfortunately a fatal building fire happening on the
       next road. The entire area was heavily congested and filled with
       multiple fire engines/emergency services. (News report here:
  HTML https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jun/20/three-men-dead-after-west-london-building-fire).<br
       />And the chaos/navigating around the emergency services had
       caused me to miss the restriction.
       Google Drive:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1916GkRf4U8sM9yrPNszA4XAYvfYfe5Ee?usp=sharing
       Thanks in advance!
       #Post#: 123918--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 6, 2026, 4:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Having looked at the video, I don't think there is much mileage
       in the green barriers around the sign pole because the sign is
       perfectly clear above them, and the barriers are on the
       pavement, not in your way as you turn.
       GSV is not recent enough to show the signs despite being July
       2025, so we can't check for an advance warning sign on
       Bloemfontaine Road. If you go that way often, look out for one;
       if there isn't one it strengthens your case.
       How far back from your turn was this emergency ?
       And were you using satnav ?
       #Post#: 123927--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: jumpingskyfox
       Date: July 6, 2026, 6:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If memory serves me right, there were multiple fire engines /
       emergency vehicles parked up on the kerb all along the red line.
       With the incident happening at the X and the O being the
       junction where the turn was made.
  HTML https://cdn.imgpile.com/f/t0YGpQI_xl.png
       Yes I was using sat nav.
       #Post#: 123930--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 6, 2026, 6:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry to say it, but like so many others, you have caused a
       "satnav assisted" PCN to be served. All over London these
       restricted streets have been rolled out, and this one is quite
       new, so unlikely to be recorded on your latest satnav update,
       and probably wont be there if you do update it tomorrow ! We see
       cases like yours where the restriction has been in position for
       several years yet still the satnav ignores it.
       What the emergency vehicles could help you with, is if there is
       an advance sign. This is likely to have been obscured or made
       very unnoticeable with all the emergency vehicles blue lights
       flashing etc.  So we need to know if there is such a sign.
       Claiming you were following satnav wont get you a win at London
       Tribunals, and the council, evr greedy for your money will
       refuse your reps, but they will re-offer the discount.
       #Post#: 123991--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: peodude
       Date: July 7, 2026, 10:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'd just try a basic appeal at first. You took a forbidden turn
       due to the emergency services blocking all the surrounding
       streets due to the building fire.
       #Post#: 124073--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: jumpingskyfox
       Date: July 8, 2026, 7:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks I will try that. Would they still offer a discount if the
       appeal is rejected?
       #Post#: 124085--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 8, 2026, 10:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: jumpingskyfox link ---
       >
       > Thanks I will try that. Would they still offer a discount if
       the appeal is rejected?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       The appeal will be rejected, not 'if'. London councils and TfL
       between them get between £600-700 million a year from PCN
       penalties, so are hardly unbiased. Apart from Havering, the
       other London councils re-offer the discount when rejecting
       representations, because they know that >95% of people then just
       cough-up, being terrified they will have to pay hundreds of
       pounds at the adjudicators. Are you one of that 95% ?
       #Post#: 124125--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: jumpingskyfox
       Date: July 8, 2026, 4:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Are you saying I should expect the appeal to be rejected, and
       prep to take this to London Tribunals/adjudicators?
       #Post#: 124134--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - Code 52M Failing to comply with a
       motor vehicle prohibition - Sawley Rd Westbound
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: July 8, 2026, 5:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: jumpingskyfox link ---
       >
       > Are you saying I should expect the appeal to be rejected, and
       prep to take this to London Tribunals/adjudicators?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes. Of course they may accept your reps, but it would be very
       unusual.
       You then will have two alternatives, (1) pay at the discounted
       rate, as they will usually re-offer this or (2) register an
       appeal at London Tribunals when the full PCN penalty will be in
       play. Of course if you win at LT you pay nothing, so it is
       essentially a 'double-or-quits' gamble
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1