DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 127680--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Being in bus lane - Islington - 34J - Old Street
DIR By: TigerShark
Date: August 12, 2026, 4:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I’ve shared everything I have. I’m clearly being dense so what
else is required? Thank you.
#Post#: 128086--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Being in bus lane - Islington - 34J - Old Street
DIR By: TigerShark
Date: August 17, 2026, 4:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Any help appreciated please.
#Post#: 128088--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Being in bus lane - Islington - 34J - Old Street
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: August 17, 2026, 4:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Tom save me time, please put up the video.
#Post#: 128090--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Being in bus lane - Islington - 34J - Old Street
DIR By: Bulop
Date: August 17, 2026, 4:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: TigerShark link ---
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As expected - here is their latest correspondence -
Enforcement Notice:
>
>
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/nYRwAY1
>
> So, I have a chance to submit formal representations now. Any
help appreciated.
>
--- End Quote ---
Their last ground of appeal in the letter here is incorrect. It
describes how the vehicle was used without the drivers consent.
That is for the London Local Authorities Act 2003, not 1996. For
the 1996 Act, there can be a driver who drives the car with
consent from the registered keeper according to the legislation.
Therefore this is not a correct ground and should be that the
registered keeper was not the driver at the time, not “used
without consent”. This amounts to a procedural impropriety which
strengthens your case. As said before Hippocrates is more of a
master in bus lane cases. If you do decide to take it to
tribunal usually most cases are won due to non-attendance, or if
they have attended they may send the wrong certification. You
can submit a representation to the authority on the grounds that
no contravention occurred as no upright signage is shown to be
passed and ask them to provide a camera certificate for the
location in compliance with the legislation. It doesn’t have to
be too detailed as it will be most likely rejected
automatically.
#Post#: 128091--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Being in bus lane - Islington - 34J - Old Street
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: August 17, 2026, 5:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/1996/9/schedule/1/enacted
The grounds are as above.
#Post#: 128378--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN - Being in bus lane - Islington - 34J - Old Street
DIR By: TigerShark
Date: August 20, 2026, 2:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you.
Agreed. Probably a case of getting to tribunal stage and doing
the require attendance clause.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 4
DIR Previous Page