URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 123418--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: tincombe
       Date: June 30, 2026, 2:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What do you think of the below i got from google
       Send it back to it!
       You passed the signs, that's it. Whether you 'only' went a
       little further and reversed out is mitigation, NOT a statutory
       defence, sorry.
       Let's hope a technical defence emerges.
       #Post#: 123422--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: June 30, 2026, 4:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: tincombe link ---
       >
       > What do you think of the below i got from google
       >
       > Send it back to it!
       >
       > You passed the signs, that's it. Whether you 'only' went a
       little further and reversed out is mitigation, NOT a statutory
       defence, sorry.
       >
       > Let's hope a technical defence emerges.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Will the Hippocrates Cavalry come to the rescue !! (or maybe
       they are Dragoons)
       #Post#: 123425--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: June 30, 2026, 4:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I been busy of late. Extra reps. can always be added. Website
       only has general box and my conflation argument. Sorry: 6 cases
       tomorrow so back after them.
       #Post#: 123557--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: Movieman9000
       Date: July 2, 2026, 5:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > I been busy of late. Extra reps. can always be added. Website
       only has general box and my conflation argument. Sorry: 6 cases
       tomorrow so back after them.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thank you.
       #Post#: 123560--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: Movieman9000
       Date: July 2, 2026, 5:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: tincombe link ---
       >
       > What do you think of the below i got from google
       >
       > Send it back to it!
       >
       > You passed the signs, that's it. Whether you 'only' went a
       little further and reversed out is mitigation, NOT a statutory
       defence, sorry.
       >
       > Let's hope a technical defence emerges.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       i don't know if these help, my case is 20m total entry, started
       breaking at 11m reason - i had to check mirrors first before
       breaking
       Case 1: Avis Rent A Car v London Borough of Camden (Case Ref:
       2120038831)The Focus: Minimal penetration and immediate
       correction.The Facts: The vehicle turned into a restricted bus
       lane, immediately braked, and safely reversed out within 3
       seconds. The council argued that crossing the threshold line
       completed the contravention.
       The Adjudicator's Ruling: Appeal Allowed. The adjudicator
       formally recorded:"The CCTV footage shows the vehicle crossed
       the threshold line but immediately stopped and reversed out of
       the restriction. The entire episode lasted no more than a few
       seconds. I am satisfied that this was a momentary error,
       immediately corrected, and did not constitute 'using' the bus
       lane. The matter falls within the principle of de minimis non
       curat lex."
       Case 2: Dr. S v London Borough of Hackney (Case Ref:
       219036728A)The Focus: Distance penetrated vs. intent to comply.
       The Facts: A motorist crossed into a Code 33 pedestrian zone by
       roughly half a car length before spotting the signs, stopping,
       and immediately reversing straight back onto the main road.
       The Adjudicator's Ruling: Appeal Allowed.
       The adjudicator noted that the absolute nature of moving traffic
       offenses must be balanced against reality:"While the council's
       camera technically records a crossing of the restriction line,
       the footage shows the driver stopped almost immediately upon
       passing the signs and reversed out safely. Enforcing a financial
       penalty where a driver actively takes instant, safe corrective
       action to comply with a restriction would be wholly
       disproportionate. The contravention did not occur in any
       meaningful sense."
       Case 3: M v Transport for London (Case Ref: 2210041275)The
       Focus: The definition of "entering" a restricted route.
       The Facts: The appellant’s car entered a restricted route
       junction due to a sudden lane merge. The driver immediately
       realized they could not legally proceed down the street, halted,
       and backed up 3 metres to exit the mouth of the junction.
       The Adjudicator's Ruling: Appeal Allowed.
       The tribunal ruled:"To satisfy the requirement of 'entering' or
       'using' a restricted route, there must be a element of passage
       along it. A vehicle that penetrates the zone by a nominal margin
       and is immediately reversed out has not used the route for
       traffic purposes. The appeal is allowed under de minimis."
       #Post#: 123943--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: Movieman9000
       Date: July 7, 2026, 3:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > I been busy of late. Extra reps. can always be added. Website
       only has general box and my conflation argument. Sorry: 6 cases
       tomorrow so back after them.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       hi sorry to chase just seeing if you have any thoughts on my
       case , thanks
       #Post#: 125074--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: Movieman9000
       Date: July 18, 2026, 1:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi guys,
       if anyone has a similar experience, would be great to share
       thank you
       #Post#: 125076--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: roythebus
       Date: July 18, 2026, 3:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The 3 cases quoted above should give you plenty of ammo.
       #Post#: 125084--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: tincombe
       Date: July 19, 2026, 3:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As far as I understand it:
       There is nothing to corroborate the OP's claim regarding
       stopping and exiting:'I realised by the time i reached the zebra
       crossing (short way in) stopped and reversed back out. This part
       has been removed from the clip.';
       They have made formal reps to which they have not yet had a
       response.
       OP, is this correct?
       #Post#: 125218--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Tower hamlets PCN 33H - using a restricted route for buses
       and cycles only 
   DIR By: Rob232
       Date: July 20, 2026, 1:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Which TWO signs are these?  I see only one in the vid, and that
       one quite high, presumably to enable visibility of the 20mph
       restriction which was originally on a post directly beside it in
       2024, and which they moved back.
       The post on the right with the "unicycle" attached to it, is the
       original post that the RH sign was attached to in the OP's gsv
       photo. You can see a yellow blip next to it on the DYLs in the
       vid and in that GSV.
       I wondered why the vid doesn't show the RH sign, can only assume
       it did when the camera was installed, but it is not there
       anymore.
       Would be good to get a recent pic showing it missing, or perhaps
       moved, but showing the unicycle post and it's relevant position
       to the other posts
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page