URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 122480--------------------------------------------------
       Cheeky PCN BRENT Council
   DIR By: Lighto15
       Date: June 20, 2026, 10:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've never been in such a situation with a council PCN. Is this
       fightable because I'm barely in the junction.
  HTML https://www.imagebam.com/view/ME1DZLPF
       
       I would be grateful for any advice.
       #Post#: 122484--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cheeky PCN BRENT Council
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: June 20, 2026, 10:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Post the video.
       The still alone looks like a contravention but the video is the
       key.
       #Post#: 122490--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cheeky PCN BRENT Council
   DIR By: MrChips
       Date: June 20, 2026, 11:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, we need to see the council evidence (the video) to assist
       with any challenge.
       Either post it up or provide the PCN number and vehicle
       registration so we can find out ourselves.
       #Post#: 122503--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Cheeky PCN BRENT Council
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: June 20, 2026, 4:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I make this collateral challenge as follows:
       The PCN is missing mandatory information as provided at Para. 4
       (8 ) (v) of
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/section/4/enacted
       (v)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the
       28 day period, an increased charge may be payable.
       Clearly, this refers to Para. 4 (8 ) (iii):
       (iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the
       period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice;
       Therefore, it follows that the statement: "If you fail to pay
       the Penalty Charge or make representations before the end of a
       period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of this
       notice an increased charge of £240 may be payable” adds to the
       lack of clarity by its omission. Even on its own, whether the
       required information was included or not, it is also arguable
       that it conflates the two periods using the word "or" which many
       would view as being conjunctive. Furthermore, even if the
       statement were to be interpreted disjunctively, there is still
       no clarity due to the missing information. So, it follows that
       it cannot possibly be interpreted dysjunctively.
       In addition, there is yet another phrase in parenthesis, which
       in its context, refers to date of service which exacerbates the
       lack of clarity further.
       Finally, your website has been found to be unfair as in case Nos
       (First two - do not cite the whole cases):
       In light of the above, please cancel the PCN.
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/12ndR546WbHvZ82vm35vV_NkyfCXsWR0r/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OR0w4cuAvqycftgpJFcYAokK_iPRAJdU/view
       You can select various phrases though.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1