URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 125655--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 24, 2026, 3:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Phillip Morgan v London Borough of Havering (2250673285, 23 July
       2026)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bB_hlGKDk9JlNIGrVyQLR7kY-n4Bm8lo/view
       #Post#: 125666--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 24, 2026, 5:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is the end of the beginning.
       Believe it or not, I have just filed yet another appeal and they
       have already increased the charge to £240 before the lawful
       period expires. They genuinely believe that the date of service
       of the NOR is the date of the notice.
       Press will be on it very very soon as they say in Bridgend!
       This must go to JR as they are ripping people off right left and
       centre.  >:(
       #Post#: 125669--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 24, 2026, 6:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > Phillip Morgan v London Borough of Havering (2250673285, 23
       July 2026)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bB_hlGKDk9JlNIGrVyQLR7kY-n4Bm8lo/view
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Costa del sol. I speak cryptically, of course. If they can find
       a few grand for a barrister, they can give me a tenth.  All
       Havering residents should be asking serious questions.
       @cp8759 beat the same barrister a few years back re the famous
       Ealing Bus Lane case re camera certification.
  HTML https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/sites/default/files/keycases/DUTHIEUW%20v%20LB%20Ealing.pdf
       We can confirm that the Counsel’s fee is £4,104.17 + VAT to be
       paid from our Parking Budget.
       @cp8759 cost me just a pint of Guinness. What a pleasant day.
       ;D
       #Post#: 125720--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 25, 2026, 9:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Next stop: The Havering Daily.
       #Post#: 125788--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 26, 2026, 9:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Freedom of information request regarding Charge Certificates
       issued for the last year from 19th June 2025 to today
       >
       > Please may I have responses to all the following questions
       within the statutory time period pertaining to all three
       legislations i.e. parking, bus lane and moving traffic
       enforcement?:
       >
       > How many charge certificates have been issued?
       > How many have been paid?
       > How much income derived?
       > How many premature charge certificates issued?
       > How many have been paid?
       > How much income?
       > How many premature charge certificates have reached the
       Traffic Enforcement Centre and been rescinded?
       > How many have been cancelled while an appeal has been pending?
       > Pertaining to 8, how many have been successfully appealed at
       the Tribunal? (I attach a most recent case as an example)
       > Pertaining to 8, how many have you cancelled while an appeal
       has been pending and you have still pursued the appellants?
       > Who is responsible for the issue of these documents?
       >
       >
       > *****************
       >
       > ETA Register of Appeals
       >
       > Register kept under Regulation 20 of the Road Traffic (Parking
       Adjudicators) (London) Regulations 1993, as amended and
       Regulation 17 of the Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic
       Contraventions (Representations and Appeals) (England)
       Regulations 2022.
       >
       > Case Details
       >
       > Case reference 2250669743
       >
       > Appellant
       >
       > Authority London Borough of Havering
       >
       > VRM BJ67GWN
       >
       > PCN Details
       >
       > PCN HG62152398
       >
       > Contravention date 02 Jul 2025
       >
       > Contravention time 08:21:00
       >
       > Contravention location Ford Lane / South End Road
       >
       > Penalty amount GBP 160.00
       >
       > Contravention Fail comply restriction vehicles entering ped
       zone
       >
       > Referral date -
       >
       > Decision Date 17 Jun 2026
       >
       > Adjudicator Mackenzie Robinson
       >
       > Appeal decision Appeal allowed
       >
       > Direction
       >
       > cancel the Penalty Charge Notice.
       >
       >
       > Reasons
       >
       > Mr  has produced a copy of a charge certificate he was served
       on 30 December 2026.
       >
       > The tribunal accepted his application to appeal on 15 December
       2025. The authority would have been duly notified, and should
       not have issued a charge certificate.
       >
       > Paragraph 5 of Schedule 1 to the London Local Authorities and
       Transport for London Act 2003 specifies the circumstances in
       which a charge certificate may be issued. In these particular
       circumstances, a charge certificate could only have been
       lawfully issued if no application to appeal against the notice
       of rejection was made within the 28 day time period.
       >
       > I therefore find that there has been a failure to follow the
       procedural requirements of the 2002 Act in relation to the
       issuing of the charge certificate.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Today:
       Dear Sir or Madam
       It is now well over the 20 day period in which to respond.
       Please respond within the next three working days or I will be
       forced to complain to the ICO.
       Regards
       007
       #Post#: 125964--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 27, 2026, 7:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Costs application accepted for a hearing.
       #Post#: 126122--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 28, 2026, 4:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Deleted.
       #Post#: 127212--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 7, 2026, 8:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Costs application accepted for a hearing.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       30th September.
       #Post#: 127553--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 11, 2026, 4:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Endemic problem which they fail to understand so this explains
       no FOIR response as they simply do not undretsand a premature
       charge ceriticate.
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RXMZoELmGRvrszTzleA3SptRxB2ybHEp/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nKO1SFBm8lPFocp8yFoTcP0u2C-GXBPx/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1s_4lh_GVaVYTOIaJ9VfOgZjrNMuAjIiw/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cKJAA5GUVO1Ozfl0IkVhxF47V-DdafCv/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bB_hlGKDk9JlNIGrVyQLR7kY-n4Bm8lo/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_sn8u91rfk7QYFL39kQWbwF3Hh-va3OM/view
       Dear Havering
       Please consider the second link pertaining to Case No.:
       2250453824.
       According to the Respondent’s case summary :
       ‘The Notice of Rejection clearly states: “Remember you only have
       28 days
       from the service of this letter to do this and prevent a Charge
       Certificate
       from being served.”
       Therefore, the 28-day period expired on 4th September 2025, and
       the Charge Certificate was issued on 5th September 2025, which
       is compliant with the statutory process. The appellant’s
       calculation based on deemed service does not apply because the
       authority considers the date of posting as the date of service,
       consistent with the wording of the Notice.’
       My proposed answer to this global madness:
  HTML http://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/enforcement-of-traffic-penalties-by-london-councils-training-of-staff-changes-in/
       #Post#: 128084--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Time to step up to the plate
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: August 17, 2026, 4:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=11196.msg122339#msg122339
       date=1781867829]
       > Freedom of information request regarding Charge Certificates
       issued for the last year from 19th June 2025 to today
       >
       > Please may I have responses to all the following questions
       within the statutory time period pertaining to all three
       legislations i.e. parking, bus lane and moving traffic
       enforcement?:
       >
       > How many charge certificates have been issued?
       > How many have been paid?
       > How much income derived?
       > How many premature charge certificates issued?
       > How many have been paid?
       > How much income?
       > How many premature charge certificates have reached the
       Traffic Enforcement Centre and been rescinded?
       > How many have been cancelled while an appeal has been pending?
       > Pertaining to 8, how many have been successfully appealed at
       the Tribunal? (I attach a most recent case as an example)
       > Pertaining to 8, how many have you cancelled while an appeal
       has been pending and you have still pursued the appellants?
       > Who is responsible for the issue of these documents?
       >
       >
       > *****************
       >
       >
       >
       > Today:
       >
       > Dear Sir or Madam
       >
       > It is now well over the 20 day period in which to respond.
       Please respond within the next three working days or I will be
       forced to complain to the ICO.
       >
       > Regards
       >
       > 007
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Complaint now with ICO. They are STILL issuing premature charge
       certificates even before the expiry of the NOR period.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page